Breast Cancer Research

official impact factor 5.79

Open Access Highly Access Research article

Evaluation of biological pathways involved in chemotherapy response in breast cancer

Attila Tordai1,4, Jing Wang2, Fabrice Andre5, Cornelia Liedtke1, Kai Yan2, Christos Sotiriou6, Gabriel N Hortobagyi1, W Fraser Symmans3 and Lajos Pusztai1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

2 Departments of Bioinformatics and Computation Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

3 Department of Pathology of The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

4 Department of Molecular Diagnostics, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary

5 Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

6 Jules Bordet Institut, Brussels, Belgium

For all author emails, please log on.

Breast Cancer Research 2008, 10:R37 doi:10.1186/bcr2088

Published: 29 April 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Our goal was to examine the association between biological pathways and response to chemotherapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancers separately.

Methods

Gene set enrichment analysis including 852 predefined gene sets, was applied to gene expression data from 51 ER-negative and 82 ER-positive breast cancers that were all treated with a preoperative paclitaxel, 5-fluoruracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

Results

Twenty-seven (53%) ER-negative and 7 (9%) ER-positive patients had pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Among the ER-negative cancers, a proliferation gene signature (FDR q = 0.1), the Genomic Grade Index (FDR q = 0.044) and the E2F3 pathway (FDR q = 0.22, p = 0.07) signature were enriched in the pCR group. Among the ER-positive cancers, the proliferation signature (FDR q = 0.001) and the Genomic Grade Index (FDR q = 0.015) were also significantly enriched in cases with pCR. Ki67 expression, as single gene marker of proliferation, did not provide the same information as the entire proliferation signature. An ER-associated gene set (FDR q = 0.03) and a mutant p53-gene signature (FDR q = 0.0019) were enriched in ER-positive cancers with residual cancer.

Conclusion

Proliferation- and genomic grade-related gene signatures are associated with chemotherapy sensitivity in both ER-negative and -positive breast cancers. Genes involved in the E2F3 pathway are associated with chemotherapy sensitivity among ER-negative cancers. The mutant p53-signature and expression of ER-related genes were associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancers only.