Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

Evaluation of biological pathways involved in chemotherapy response in breast cancer

Attila Tordai1,2 email, Jing Wang3 email, Fabrice Andre4 email, Cornelia Liedtke1 email, Kai Yan3 email, Christos Sotiriou5 email, Gabriel N Hortobagyi1 email, W Fraser Symmans email and Lajos Pusztai1 email

1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA

2Department of Molecular Diagnostics, National Medical Center, Szabolcs utca 33-35, 1135 Budapest, Hungary

3Department of Bioinformatics and Computation Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA

4Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France

5Jules Bordet Institut, 121 Boulevard de Waterloolaan, Brussels 1000, Belgium

author email corresponding author email

Breast Cancer Research 2008, 10:R37doi:10.1186/bcr2088

Published: 29 April 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Our goal was to examine the association between biological pathways and response to chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast tumors separately.

Methods

Gene set enrichment analysis including 852 predefined gene sets was applied to gene expression data from 51 ER- and 82 ER+ breast tumors that were all treated with a preoperative paclitaxel, 5-fluoruracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

Results

Twenty-seven (53%) ER- and 7 (9%) ER+ patients had pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Among the ER- tumors, a proliferation gene signature (false discovery rate [FDR] q = 0.1), the genomic grade index (FDR q = 0.044), and the E2F3 pathway signature (FDR q = 0.22, P = 0.07) were enriched in the pCR group. Among the ER+ tumors, the proliferation signature (FDR q = 0.001) and the genomic grade index (FDR q = 0.015) were also significantly enriched in cases with pCR. Ki67 expression, as single gene marker of proliferation, did not provide the same information as the entire proliferation signature. An ER-associated gene set (FDR q = 0.03) and a mutant p53 gene signature (FDR q = 0.0019) were enriched in ER+ tumors with residual cancer.

Conclusion

Proliferation- and genomic grade-related gene signatures are associated with chemotherapy sensitivity in both ER- and ER+ breast tumors. Genes involved in the E2F3 pathway are associated with chemotherapy sensitivity among ER- tumors. The mutant p53 signature and expression of ER-related genes were associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy in ER+ breast tumors only.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated < info@breast-cancer-research.com >   Terms and conditions