Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Summary of current trials investigating the prognostic value of genomic signatures in primary node negative breast cancer |
|||||||
|
TRIAL |
Study population |
Lymph node |
N |
Sponsor |
Study design |
Randomisation procedure |
Primary outcome |
|
|
|||||||
|
TAILORx |
ER+ and/or PR+ Her2-ve Tumour size 1.1 to 5.0 cm Tumour size 5 mm to 1.0 cm if poor risk features (LVI, high grade) |
Negative |
10,046 |
NCI |
Oncotype DX assay to determine recurrence score (RS) Group 1: RS <11; standard hormonal therapy Group 2 (primary study group): RS 11 to 25 Group 3: RS >25; combination chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy |
Group 2: randomised to receive hormonal therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy |
DFS Distant recurrence-free survival Recurrence free survival Overall survival |
|
MINDACT |
T1-3 |
Negative |
6,000 |
EORTC |
Establish Clinical Prognostic Risk (Adjuvant! Online) and Molecular Prognostic Risk scores based on 70-gene expression signature. Patients divided into three categories: 1. HIGH/HIGH: concordant genomic and clinical risk 2. DISCORDANT RISK 3. LOW/LOW: concordant low risk |
HIGH/HIGH: anthracycline based chemotherapy versus docetaxel/capecitabine DISCORDANT RISK: randomisation to use Genomic or Clinical Risk scores to decide chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy |
To establish whether patients with low risk molecular prognosis and high risk clinical prognosis can be safely spared chemotherapy |
|
|
|||||||
|
DFS, disease-free survival; EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; ER, estrogen receptor; MINDACT, Microarray In Node negative Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy; PR, progesterone receptor; RS, recurrence score; TAILORx, Trial Assigning IndividuaLized Options for Treatment (Rx). |
|||||||
|
Swanton et al. Breast Cancer Research 2008 10:214 doi:10.1186/bcr2159 |
|||||||