Table 1

Pooling design for ER-positive versus ER-negative cryogenic whole tumor sections

Experimental variable designation

Pools

Tumor number

RNA quality

Tumor status

Lymph node status

Grade

ER status

PR status

Her2/neu status

Age of patient (years)


ER positive

T378

ok

2

0

2

12

4

0

75

ER+1


T392

ok

2

0

2

12

2

2a

61


T460

ok

2

0

2

4

8

3

79

ER+2


T464

ok

2

0

2

12

8

0

50


T288

ok

2

0

2

12

4

1

76

ER+3


T711

ok

4

2

3

8

6

0

65


T712

ok

2

1

2

9

4

0

58

ER+4


T425

ok

2

1

2

12

0

0

78


ER negative

T433

ok

2

0

2

0

0

1

42

ER-1


T443

ok

2

1

2

0

12

0

46


T469

ok

1

0

2–3

0

0

3

50

ER-2


T470

ok

2

1

2

0

0

0

39


T531

ok

2

0

2

0

0

0

58

ER-3


T558

ok

2

0

2–3

0

0

0

62


T623

ok

1

x

2–3

0

0

1

42

ER-4


T640

ok

2

0

3

0

0

3

62


Individual tumors are designated by their tumor bank T registration numbers. Experimental, clinical, and histopathological parameters are listed. Eight ER-positive and eight ER-negative tumors are grouped into four pools of two tumors each, as indicated. Clinical data comprise the following: tumor status ranging from pT1 (tumor 2 cm or smaller in greatest dimension) to pT3 (tumor >5 cm); lymph node status from pN0 (no regional lymph node metastasis) to pN3 (metastasis to ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes [s]) and pNx (regional lymph node cannot be assessed); tumor grade from 2 (moderately differentiated) to 3 (poorly differentiated); histopathologic data for ER and PR (0 = undetectable; 1 to 3 = weakly positive; 4 to 7 = moderately positive; 8–12 = highly positive); and Her2/neu-status (0 = negative, positive +1 to +3). Ages for each patient are given in years. aNo gene amplification detected. x, pNx regional lymphnodes cannot be assessed. ER, estrogen receptor; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.

Neubauer et al. Breast Cancer Research 2008 10:R85   doi:10.1186/bcr2155

Open Data