Table 2 |
||
|
In a multivariate analysis of breast cancer cases, the expression of YB-1 was better than HER-2 or ER in predicting reduced BCSS |
||
|
Prognostic marker |
Patients with reduced BCSS |
|
|
|
||
|
HR (95% CI) |
P value |
|
|
|
||
|
Nodal status |
||
|
Positive versus negative |
2.405 (2.083 to 2.776) |
4.6 × 10-33 |
|
|
||
|
Tumor size (cm) |
||
|
2 to 5 |
1.605 (1.387 to 1.859) |
2.8 × 10-10 |
|
>5 |
2.269 (1.749 to 2.943) |
2.8 × 10-10 |
|
|
||
|
Grade |
||
|
III versus II versus I |
1.416 (1.215 to 1.651) |
8.9 × 10-6 |
|
|
||
|
Age (years) |
||
|
<50 versus = 50 |
1.160 (1.000 to 1.345) |
5.0 × 10-2 |
|
|
||
|
ER |
||
|
Positive versus negative |
0.816 (0.720 to 0.991) |
3.8 × 10-2 |
|
|
||
|
Her-2 |
||
|
Positive versus negative |
1.259 (1.052 to 1.506) |
1.2 × 10-2 |
|
|
||
|
YB-1 |
||
|
Positive versus negative |
1.456 (1.257 to 1.656) |
5.6 × 10-7 |
|
|
||
|
YB-1 was approximately equal to the power of tumor grade yet not as accurate as tumor size or nodal status in predicting reduced BCSS. BCSS, breast cancer specific survival; CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; HR, hazard ratio; YB-1 = Y-box binding protein-1. |
||
|
Habibi et al. Breast Cancer Research 2008 10:R86 doi:10.1186/bcr2156 |
||