|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 2.
A number of models have been proposed to explain the biological complexities of metastasis.
(a) Progression model. A primary neoplasm gains a progressively more metastatic phenotype
through a stochastic accumulation of somatic mutations. (b) Transient compartment model. All viable cells in a tumor acquire metastatic capacity,
but due to positional and/or random epigenetic events only a small fraction are capable
of completing the process at a given moment in time. (c) Fusion model. To gain a fully metastatic phenotype, a tumor cell must acquire certain
characteristics of lymphoid cells (for example, proteolytic degradation, the ability
to intra- and extravasate). This phenotype is achieved by nuclear transduction with
cells of myeloid origin. (d) Gene transfer model. A characteristic of malignancy is the presence of tumor DNA in
the bloodstream. This DNA, carrying the somatic mutations associated with neoplasia,
is carried to the secondary site. Subsequently, the tumor DNA is absorbed by stem
cells at the distant organ, which endow the stem cell with malignant properties. (e) Early oncogenesis model. The metastatic potential of any primary tumor is set early
in its evolution, presumably as a consequence of somatic mutation. This is why it
is possible to accurately predict prognosis from bulk tumor tissue using microarray
gene expression signatures. (f) Genetic predisposition model. The metastatic potential of any primary tumor is altered
by the genetic background upon which it arises. That is, an individual will be more
or less susceptible to tumor dissemination as a consequence of constitutional polymorphism.
Such germline variations influence all aspects of the metastatic cascade, including
the expression of pro-metastatic gene expression signatures within the primary tumor.
Hunter et al. Breast Cancer Research 2008 10(Suppl 1):S2 doi:10.1186/bcr1988 |