Log on/register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 

This article is part of the supplement: Symposium Mammographicum 2008 .

Oral presentation

Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: results of the COMICE trial

L Turnbull

Centre for MR Investigation, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK

from Symposium Mammographicum 2008
Lille, France. 6–8 July 2008

Breast Cancer Research 2008, 10(Suppl 3):P10doi:10.1186/bcr2008

The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/10/S3/P10

Published: 7 July 2008

© 2008 BioMed Central Ltd

Oral presentation

The role of the addition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to routine techniques for locoregional staging of primary breast cancer is unclear. The COMICE trial considered whether adding a MRI scan to conventional triple assessment (mammogram, ultrasound and biopsy) assisted locoregional staging, and thereby reduced reoperation rates, for patients with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision.

The primary endpoint of the COMICE trial considered the proportion of patients undergoing a repeat operation or mastectomy at further surgery within 6 months of randomisation, or an avoidable mastectomy at initial surgery (reoperation rate). This was compared using logistic regression adjusting for age, breast density, and surgeon.

Between December 2001 and January 2007, 1,625 patients were randomised to receive MRI (n = 817) or not (n = 808). The reoperation rate within 6 months (primary outcome) was 18.8% (MRI) and 19.3% (no MRI). No significant difference between the arms was detected (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = (0.75, 1.24), P = 0.7691). Secondary endpoints included quality of life, imaging effectiveness and local recurrence.

The results of the COMICE trial indicate no significant benefit in terms of reduction in reoperation rates by the addition of MRI to conventional triple assessment for this patient group. These results have importance from both health economic and patient burden perspectives.

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme (Project Number 99/27/05) and will be published in full in a HTA report. The view and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.