Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 

This article is part of the supplement: Symposium Mammographicum 2008 .

Oral presentation

Evaluating tumour response to primary radiochemotherapy in breast cancer patients: what role for breast magnetic resonance imaging?

F Thibault, MA Bollet, A Tardivon, C Malhaire and G Zemmour-Elfersi

Institut Curie, Paris, France

from Symposium Mammographicum 2008
Lille, France. 6–8 July 2008

Breast Cancer Research 2008, 10(Suppl 3):P15doi:10.1186/bcr2013

The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/10/S3/P15

Published: 7 July 2008

© 2008 BioMed Central Ltd

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of clinical examination and of three imaging modalities (mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) to assess the tumour response to a pre-operative regimen of concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers, and to anticipate the eventual complete pathologic response.

Methods

Sixty breast cancer women not amenable to conserving surgery at initial presentation were accrued in a phase II study. Treatment consisted of four cycles of 5-fluorouracil–vinorelbine with, starting with the second cycle of chemotherapy, radiotherapy to the breast and regional lymph nodes. Breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy was performed 4 to 6 weeks after completion of irradiation. Imaging assessment was performed before chemotherapy and preoperatively.

Results

Referring to pathologic data, the MRI assessment performed best. A 50% or greater decrease in the largest tumour diameter in MRI was linked to complete pathologic response with 81% sensitivity and 75% specificity. MRI–pathologic correlations helped understand the pitfalls in MRI interpretation that led to overestimating/underestimating some tumour responses.

Conclusion

Compared with the other assessment modalities, MRI substantially improved the prediction of pathologic tumour response. Pitfalls or limits in MRI interpretation in this specific setting were better understood.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.