An intraductal human-in-mouse transplantation model mimics the subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ
-
* Corresponding author: Fariba Behbod fbehbod@kumc.edu
1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
4 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8118, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
5 Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney Street, Dana 740C, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Breast Cancer Research 2009, 11:R66 doi:10.1186/bcr2358
Published: 7 September 2009Additional files
Additional file 1:
A Quicktime video demonstrating the intraductal transplantation technique.
Format: QT Size: 7.8MB Download file
Additional file 2:
A Word file listing primary antibodies.
Format: DOC Size: 39KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 3:
A Word file containing classification of tumor subtypes by immunoassay. Expression of Her-2, ER, CK-5, and Her-1 by immunostaining may be used to predict tumor subtypes by microarray with a high degree of specificity [9,10]. Based on immunostaining, DCIS.COM generates basal, and SUM-225 and FSK-H7 generate Her-2-overexpressing DCIS-like lesions.
Format: DOC Size: 40KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 4:
A TIF file containing flow-cytometry analysis of DCIS.COM and SUM-225 for co-expression of basal and luminal surface markers. SUM-225 and DCIS.COM were stained by using antibodies to CD44/CD24, CD49f/MUC-1, and CD49f/CD24. The gated subpopulations in each panel were sorted, and the in vivo growth potential was assessed by using intraductal transplantation. As illustrated by FACS-generated dot plots, the majority of cells in DCIS.COM are CD44hi, CD49fhi, MUC-1med, and CD24med. Therefore, DCIS.COM subpopulations (in Table 1) do not contain CD49flo-, CD44lo-, CD24hi-, or MUC-1hi-expressing cells. SUM-225 cells were predominantly CD44med, CD49fmed, MUC-1hi, and CD24hi. Therefore, SUM-225 subpopulations (in Table 1) do not include CD49fhi-, CD44hi-, CD24lo-, and MUC-1lo-expressing cells.
Format: TIFF Size: 8.2MB Download file
Additional file 5:
A Word file Subgroup comparisons by using Fisher's Exact test.
Format: DOC Size: 115KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
