Table 2

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors related to axillary lymph node invasion

Factor
Variable
No. of women
Positive nodes (%)
Odds ratio
95% CI
P

Histology
Ductal
45
29 (64%)
1.00



Other
7
6 (86%)
3.31
0.37-29.97
0.287
Tumor mass
Single
36
21 (58%)
1.00



Other
16
14 (88%)
5.00
0.99-25.34
0.052
Clinical response
No
13
(77%)
1.00



Yes
39
25 (64%)
0.54
0.13-2.28
0.398
ER
Negative
22
16 (73%)
1.00



Positive
30
19 (63%)
0.65
0.20-2.14
0.477
PR
Negative
28
21 (75%)
1.00



Positive
24
14 (58%)
0.47
0.14-1.52
0.205
c-erb-B2
Negative
37
24 (64%)
1.00



Positive
15
11 (73%)
1.49
0.37-5.62
0.557
53
Negative
34
24 (71%)
1.00



Positive
18
11 (61%)
0.65
0.20-2.18
0.489
Ki67
<20%
17
6 (35%)
1.00



≥ 20%
33
27 (82%)
8.25
2.18-31.23
0.002
MDR1 (IHC)
Negative
14
8 (57%)
1.00



Positive
9
7 (78%)
2.63
0.39-17.46
0.318
LRP
Negative
8
3 (38%)
1.00



Positive
23
17 (74%)
4.72
0.86-26.04
0.075
MDR1 (RT-PCR)
Negative
24
13 (54%)
1.00



Positive
22
18 (82%)
3.81
0.99-14.67
0.052
MDR1 (RT-PCR)
Both negative
8
3 (38%)
1.00


and LRP combined







LRP+ MDR1-
7
4 (57%)
2.22
0.28-17.63
0.450

Both positive
15
13 (87%)
10.83
1.37-85.43
0.024

CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; RT-PCR, reverse-transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction.

Schneider et al. Breast Cancer Res 2001 3:183   doi:10.1186/bcr293

Open Data