Breast Cancer Research

official impact factor 5.79

This article is part of the supplement: Symposium Mammographicum 2004

Oral presentation

A 3-year audit of radiographer screen film reading

AE Hubbard1,2, SL Lawson1,2, SC Duthie1,2, RL Tetlow1,2, C Bradley1,2 and E Dean1,2

Author Affiliations

1 Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Hull, UK

2 Humberside BreastScreening Programme, Hull, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Breast Cancer Res 2004, 6(Suppl 1):P11 doi:10.1186/bcr830


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:


Published:14 July 2004

©

Oral presentation

A team of five radiographers assists with film reading in our large combined screening and symptomatic breast unit. The first were trained in 1999, and now have 5 years experience. For the last 3 years their screen reading performance has been intensively audited.

Film reading numbers have ranged from 4.8 to 11,000/year. Cancer detection rates average 6/1000, with the best radiographer achieving 7/1000. Recall rates are kept low by consensus review of all recalls, less than 5%.

Film reading performance in real life does reflect the 'PERFORMS' score.

Lobular cancers are more likely to be missed by new film readers and are disproportionately over-represented in the 'minority report' cancers detected.

In conclusion, radiographers perform as well as average breast-screening radiologists after 3 years supervised experience.