Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Breast Cancer Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

High expression of Lewisy/b antigens is associated with decreased survival in lymph node negative breast carcinomas

Zahra Madjd1, Tina Parsons2, Nicholas FS Watson1, Ian Spendlove1, Ian Ellis3 and Lindy G Durrant12*

Author Affiliations

1 Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, Institute of Infections Immunity and Inflammation, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK

2 Scancell Ltd, BioCity, Nottingham, UK

3 Department of Histopathology, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Breast Cancer Research 2005, 7:R780-R787  doi:10.1186/bcr1305


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/7/5/R780


Received:16 April 2005
Revisions received:25 June 2005
Accepted:12 July 2005
Published:28 July 2005

© 2005 Madjd et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Introduction

There is sufficient evidence that blood group related Lewis antigens are tumour-associated molecules. The Lewisy and Lewisb antigens are complex carbohydrates that are over-expressed by breast, lung, colon and ovarian cancers. The SC101 mAb is a unique Lewisy/b binding antibody that binds to native and extended Lewisy and Lewisb haptens, displaying no cross reactivity with H type 1, H type 2, Lewisx or normal blood group antigens.

Methods

Immunohistochemical detection of Lewisy/b was performed on 660 formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded breast tumour specimens using a streptavidin-biotin peroxidase technique. Tissue from these patients had previously been included in tissue microarrays. This cohort comprises a well characterized series of patients with primary operable breast cancer diagnosed between 1987 and 1992, obtained from the Nottingham Tenovus Primary Breast Carcinoma Series. This includes patients 70 years of age or less, with a mean follow up of 7 years.

Results

Of the breast carcinomas, 370 of 660 (56%) were negative for Lewisy/b expression, 110 (17%) cases showed a low level of expression (<25% of positive cells) and only 54 cases (8%) showed extensive expression of Lewisy/b (>75% of positive cells). We found significant positive associations between histological grade (p < 0.001), Nottingham Prognostic Index (p = 0.016), tumour type (p = 0.007) and the level of Lewis y/b expression. There was a significant correlation between the proportion of Lewisy/b positive tumour cells and survival in lymph-node negative patients (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The unique epitope recognised by SC101 mAb on Lewisy/b hapten is over-expressed on breast tumour tissue compared with normal breast. In this large series of invasive breast cancers, higher expression of Lewisy/b was more often found in high grade and poor prognosis tumours compared to good prognosis cancers. Moreover, in lymph node negative breast carcinomas, over-expression of Lewisy/b hapten was associated with significantly decreased patient survival.

Introduction

Blood group related antigens are frequently altered in association with neoplastic transformation [1-3]. Lewis blood group antigens Lewisa and Lewisb, and their positional isomers Lewisx and Lewisy, are carbohydrate antigens. Lewisy antigen is a difucosylated oligosaccharide with the chemical structure Fucα1→2Galβ1→4[Fucα1→3]GlcNAcβ1→R, which belongs to the A, B, H, Lewis blood group family. The Lewisy antigen is expressed predominately during embryogenesis, and in adults expression is restricted to granulocytes and epithelial surfaces [4]. Over-expression of Lewisy has been shown in the majority of cancer cells derived from epithelial tissues, however, including breast, ovary, pancreas, prostate, colon and non-small cell lung cancers [5], either at the plasma membrane as a glycolipid or linked to surface receptors (e.g. of the E-rb-B family) [6].

The SC101/29 mAb is a unique Lewisy/b binding antibody that recognises both Lewisy and Lewisb haptens [7]. It shows no cross reactivity with H type 1 or H type 2, Lewisx or normal blood group antigens. This antibody binds strongly to a wide range of tumour tissues, including colon, gastric and ovarian and it may also show strong reactivity with a range of normal tissue expressing either Lewisy or Lewisb.

To our knowledge, there has been no previous study examining whether there is any prognostic significance of Lewisy/b expression in breast carcinoma. It was, therefore, of interest to determine the expression of Lewisy/b in a large series of breast cancer tissue arrays using the SC101 mAb. Expression of Lewisy/b was then associated with clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes.

Materials and methods

Patients and tumour characteristics

The study group consisted of 660 primary operable invasive breast carcinomas from patients aged 27 to 70 years (median 54 years) diagnosed from 1987 to 1992 and obtained from the Nottingham Tenovus Primary Breast Carcinoma Series. Patient characteristics, including age and menopausal status, along with information on local, regional and distant recurrence and survival were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Patients and tumour characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients were followed up at 3 month intervals initially, then every 6 to 12 months for a median period of 83 months, with a mean survival of 77 months (1 to 151 months). Ethical approval was granted by the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee.

Table 1. Patient and tumour characteristics

This is a well characterized series of primary operable breast cancers treated in a uniform manner, and has been used to study a wide range of potential prognostic factors and markers. Tumour characteristics, including histological grade [8], tumour type [9], vascular invasion [10], menopausal status [11], tumour size, lymph node stage and Nottingham Prognostic Index [12] are routinely assessed and recorded in a prospectively maintained database. The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) score was calculated for each patient based on the following equation:

NPI = 0.2 × tumour size (cm) + grade (1–3) + lymph node stage (1–3)

This index predicts survival of patients with invasive breast cancer and is used clinically to define three groups with either a good (NPI =≤ 3.4), moderate (3.41 < NPI ≤ 5.4) or poor (NPI > 5.4) prognosis according to the score obtained. Patient management was based on tumour characteristics by NPI and hormone receptor status. Patients with an NPI score ≤ 3.4 received no adjuvant therapy, those with a NPI score >3.4 received tamoxifen if estrogen receptor (ER) positive (± Zoledex if pre-menopausal) or classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) if ER negative and fit enough to tolerate chemotherapy.

Construction of the tissue microarray blocks

At the time of resection, all tumours were managed in a standardised fashion, with immediate incision and fixation in neutral buffered formalin to minimize any diffusion problems, followed by processing through to embedding in paraffin wax. Breast cancer tissue microarrays were prepared as described previously [13]. Microarray samples with a diameter of 0.6 mm were punched from selected regions of each 'donor' block using a manual Tissue Arrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA), and precisely arrayed into a new recipient paraffin block. These tissue microarray blocks were constructed in triplicate, at a density of 100 cores per block.

Immunohistochemistry

The SC101 mAb binds to native and extended Lewisy and Lewisb haptens [7]. Tissue microarray sections 4 μm thick were cut and immunohistochemical staining was performed using a strepavidin-biotin complex (ABC) method as described previously [14]. Microwave pre-treatment was performed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 minutes at high power followed by 10 minutes at low power to retrieve antigenicity. The primary antibody SC101 was incubated on the slides for 1 h, at an optimal dilution found to be 1:1000 (stock concentration 1.1 mg/ml). Negative controls, consisting of normal swine serum instead of primary antibody, confirmed the specificity of the staining. Sections from a colon carcinoma previously determined to express Lewisy/b were used as positive control.

Evaluation of immunostaining

All immunostained tissue arrays were evaluated using a semi-quantitative system (by ZM) after a series was examined on a double-headed microscope blinded to patients' outcome and other clinical and pathological parameters. The obtained results were confirmed by two observers (ZM and IOE) using a multi-headed microscope and, in difficult cases, a consensus was achieved. Two features were assessed, the intensity of staining and the percentage of cells stained. The intensity of the immunostaining was classified into four categories: 0, no immunostaining present (as shown in Fig. 1); 1, weak immunostaining (Fig. 2); 2, moderate immunostaining (Fig. 3); and 3, strong immunostaining (Fig. 4). The percentage of positive cells at each intensity was also assessed semi-quantitatively, then classified into four groups as 1 (<25% positive cells), 2 (25% to 50% positive cells), 3 (51% to 75% positive cells) or 4 (>75% positive cells). In addition, the histochemical score (H score) of immunoreactivity was obtained by multiplying the intensity and percentage scores [15]. The histochemical scores were subgrouped into three groups of equal range for analysis, and a score of <100 was considered weak, 100 to 200 as moderate and 201 to 300 as strong.

thumbnailFigure 1. Tissue microarray core demonstrating tumour with absent Lewisy/b expression. Fifty-six percent of breast tumours were entirely negative for Lewisy/b expression using SC101 monoclonal antibody.

thumbnailFigure 2. Tissue microarray core demonstrating tumour with weak Lewisy/b expression. Seventy percent of breast tumours showed weak expression of Lewisy/b using SC101.

thumbnailFigure 3. Tissue microarray core demonstrating tumour with moderate Lewisy/b expression. Thirteen percent of tumours showed moderate expression of Lewisy/b.

thumbnailFigure 4. Tissue microarray core demonstrating tumour with strong Lewisy/b expression. Fourteen percent of tumours demonstrated strong expression of Lewisy/b.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of data was performed using the SPSS package (version 11 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance of associations was determined by means of the Pearson R test and/or Pearson chi-square tests. To give sizes of effect and to look at the independence of effects, the percentage of Lewisy/b positive cells reclassified as a binary outcome (high, >25% positive cells; low, <25% positive cells) and effects of clinicopathological parameters were assessed using multiple logistic regression to give adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

In survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves were derived and the statistical significance of differences in survival between groups with different Lewisy/b expression was determined using the log-rank test. Survival was censored if the patients were still alive at the time of data analysis, or at the time of death for patients who died from an unrelated cause. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent prognostic effect of variables on overall survival. P-values of <0.05 were identified as statistically significant.

Results

Level of expression of Lewisy/b on breast carcinomas

Of the breast carcinomas, 370 out of 660 (56%) were entirely negative for Lewisy/b expression (Fig. 1). A variable percentage of positively staining tumour cells was observed among the remaining 290 breast carcinomas; 110 (17%) cases showed a low level of expression (<25% of positive cells) and only 54 cases (8%) showed extensive expression of Lewisy/b (>75% of positive cells) on the cell membrane (Table 2). The staining observed was predominantly localised to the cell membrane and cytoplasm. No nuclear staining was observed.

Table 2. Percentage of cells showing immunoreactivity of SC101

Similarly, with regard to the intensity of staining, 17% (106) showed weak expression of Lewisy/b, whereas 89 (13%) and 95 (14%) of cases showed moderate and strong staining, respectively (Figs 2, 3, 4; Table 3).

Table 3. Intensity of SC101 expression

Association of Lewisy/b expression with clinicopathological characteristics

A frequency histogram for the percentage of positive cells stained demonstrated that the mean value was 25%. This was therefore chosen as an appropriate cut-off for subsequent analysis (data not shown). Tumours were therefore divided into those with <25% versus those with >25% positive cells stained based on the distribution of staining results.

A significant positive relationship was found between the percentage of Lewisy/b positive tumour cells and histological grade of invasive tumours (p < 0.001; Table 4); a higher percentage of Lewisy/b positive tumour cells were identified more frequently in histological grade 3 tumours compared to grade 1 lesions. The odds ratio for higher percentage of Lewisy/b in those with a poor histological grade compared with those with a well differentiated tumour was 2.509 (95% confidence interval, 1.51 to 4.16) (Table 5).

Table 4. Association of Lewisy/b expression with clinicopathological characteristics (chi-square test)

Table 5. Logistic regression analysis of percentage of Lewisy/b positive cellsa

A higher percentage of positive tumour cells was also identified more frequently in tumours from patients in the poor prognosis NPI group (NPI > 5.4) compared with those in the good prognosis group (NPI ≤ 3.4, p < 0.016), with an odds ratio of 1.99 (1.13 to 3.5) (Table 5). In addition, a higher proportion of Lewis y/b positive tumour cells was seen more frequently in poor prognosis tumour types (ductal/ NST (No special type)), solid lobular, lobular mixed or mixed NST and lobular cancers) compared to the excellent prognosis tumour types (tubulo-lobular, tubular, mucinous and invasive cribriform) (p < 0.007), with an odds ratio of 3.12 (1.07 to 9.11) (Table 5).

There was a positive association between the observed intensity of expression of Lewisy/b and histological tumour grade (p = 0.009). No association was found, however, between intensity of expression and NPI or tumour type. Similarly, we could not find any association between either intensity of expression or the percentage of positive cells and the vascular invasion status, local recurrence, lymph node stage or menopausal status (Table 4).

Survival analysis

Kaplan-Meier analysis of this cohort of breast cancer patients, with mean follow-up of 7 years, did not demonstrate significant differences in the overall survival between patients with a low percentage of Lewisy/b positive cells (<25%) versus patients with >25% positive tumour cells in the cohort as a whole (Fig. 5). On subgroup analysis, however, a significant correlation (p = 0.006) was identified between the proportion of Lewisy/b positive tumour cells and survival in lymph-node negative patients (Fig. 6). Analysis using the log-rank test showed that in these lymph-node negative tumours (n = 430), patients with a low percentage of Lewisy/b positive cells (<25% positive cells, n = 315) have significantly longer survival times than patients with >25% positive tumour cells (n = 115, p = 0.006).

thumbnailFigure 5. Correlation between the percentage of Lewisy/b positive tumour cells and overall survival (n = 660). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Comparison of breast cancer patients with a low percentage of Lewisy/b positive cells (blue curve: <25% positive cells, n = 480), and patients with >25% positive tumour cells (green curve: n = 180, p = 0.091).

thumbnailFigure 6. Percentage of Lewisy/b positive cells and overall survival in node-negative breast cancer patients (n = 430). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with a low percentage of Lewisy/b positive cells (blue curve: <25% positive cells, n = 315) have significantly longer survival times than patients with >25% positive tumour cells (green curve: n = 115, p = 0.006).

In contrast, there was no significant association between the intensity of Lewisy/b expression and overall survival between the patient group with no expression of Lewisy/b versus positive tumours (weak, moderate or strong staining) in the cohort as a whole (log rank = 0.667), or on subgroup analysis in lymph-node negative patients (log rank = 0.140).

Multivariate analysis, including the factors of tumour size, nodal status, tumour grade and Lewisy/b expression showed that tumour size, tumour grade and nodal status were independent prognostic parameters, whereas Lewisy/b expression was not an independent prognostic marker in this patient cohort.

Discussion

Blood group related antigens are frequently altered in association with neoplastic transformation in many organs. This study illustrates the prognostic and potential predictive value of Lewisy/b expression in a large series of 660 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Forty-four percent of cases demonstrated Lewisy/b expression, with eight percent showing extensive expression. A higher percentage of Lewisy/b expression was significantly correlated with histological grade, NPI and histological tumour type group and, in lymph-node negative patients, overall survival decreased with increasing level of Lewisy/b expression.

There are few previous reports of blood group antigens in relation to prognosis from breast cancer. Our results are in concordance with a previous study, however, in which higher expression of Lewisa and Lewisb was observed in lymph node negative tumours than in lymph node positive tumours, and higher expression of Lewisb was seen in stage T4 than in stage T1 tumours, suggesting that the expression of sialosyl-Lewisb and Lewisa antigens in breast cancer may predict metastases to lymph nodes [16]. A positive correlation between Lewisy expression and a poor prognosis has also been shown for superficial oesophageal carcinomas [17].

Lewisy and Lewisb are expressed on both glycolipids and glycoproteins [6,18]. It has been shown that an antibody, ABL-364, recognising Lewisy can inhibit Erb-B signalling by rerouting these receptors to a submembrane compartment from which they rapidly recycle to the cell surface [19]. A previous study on this series of breast tissue arrays has shown that expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (Erb-B1) was significantly associated with a high histological grade, high NPI score, negative ER status, larger tumour size, the development of distant metastases and death from cancer. We have also demonstrated that c-erbB-2 expression independently predicted for poor overall survival in this population of breast cancer patients [20]. There was no association, however, between Erb-B1 expression and Lewisy expression in this group of tumours.

Lewisy can be up-regulated in response to cellular stress. Indeed, up-regulation of Lewisy in response to chemotherapeutic stress, and in particular to the chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil, has been previously reported [21]. In early stage breast cancer, expression of Lewisy/b may, therefore, be a marker of aggressive or stressed tumours.

A range of Lewisy antibodies have been identified, but these consistently cross react with Lewisx and H type 2 structures. This can lead to undesirable cross reactivity with normal tissues and subsequent toxicity in clinical trials. In a phase I study of the murine BR55-2 anti-Lewisy antibody, which cross reacts with H antigen in breast cancer patients, haematuria occurred in 6/12 patients and diarrhoea in 2/9 patients, with only transient reductions in skin lesions seen in 3 patients [22]. A chimeric BR-96-doxorubicin conjugate has also been evaluated in patients with a range of advanced cancers. BR-96 cross-reacts with B hapten and gastrointestinal binding was found to be dose limiting [23]. Finally, the Lewisy specific humanised antibody 3S193 has shown good selectivity in binding studies and is about to enter phase I clinical trials [24]. Lewisy has also been suggested as a target for cancer vaccines; however, immunising with synthetic Lewisy generated carbohydrate specific antibodies but they failed to bind to tumour cells. In contrast, MMA383 is an anti-idiotypic antibody that mimics Lewisy and stimulates good antibody responses. It has been humanised [25] and will shortly enter clinical trials.

Conclusion

Analysis of Lewisy/b expression in early stage breast cancer patients may aid selection of patients for more aggressive chemotherapy, as tumours with a high percentage of cells expressing Lewisy/b appear to have a significantly greater chance of disease progression. This may also eventually allow stratification of patients for mAb therapy directed against these carbohydrate antigens; however, specific antibodies that directly induce cell killing but do not cross react with H or B blood groups first need to be selected. SC101/29 is a promising candidate and is currently being humanised for clinical trials.

Abbreviations

ER = estrogen receptor; mAb = monoclonal antibody; NPI = Nottingham Prognostic Index.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

ZM and NFSW carried out the immunohistochemistry, scored the staining, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. TP made the SC101 primary antibody. LGD, IOE and IS designed the study and provided the tissue microarray. All authors were responsible for interpreting the results and drafting the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs Claire Paish and Mr John Ronan for their technical advice. This work was supported by a grant from the CRUK.

References

  1. Wiley EL, Mendelsohn G, Eggleston JC: Distribution of carcinoembryonic antigens and blood group substances in adenocarcinoma of the colon.

    Lab Invest 1981, 44:507-513. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  2. Inoue M, Nakayama M, Tanizawa O: Altered expression of Lewis blood group and related antigens in fetal, normal adult and malignant tissues of the uterine endometrium.

    Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1990, 416:221-228. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Inoue M, Sasagawa T, Saito J, Shimizu H, Ueda G, Tanizawa O, Nakayama M: Expression of blood group antigens A, B, H, Lewis-a, and Lewis-b in fetal, normal, and malignant tissues of the uterine endometrium.

    Cancer 1987, 60:2985-2993. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  4. Dettke M, Palfi G, Loibner H: Activation-dependent expression of the blood group-related lewis Y antigen on peripheral blood granulocytes.

    J Leukoc Biol 2000, 68:511-514. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Hellstrom I, Garrigues HJ, Garrigues U, Hellstrom KE: Highly tumor-reactive, internalizing, mouse monoclonal antibodies to Le(y)-related cell surface antigens.

    Cancer Res 1990, 50:2183-2190. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  6. Basu A, Murthy U, Rodeck U, Herlyn M, Mattes L, Das M: Presence of tumor-associated antigens in epidermal growth factor receptors from different human carcinomas.

    Cancer Res 1987, 47:2531-2536. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  7. Durrant LG, Singhal A, Jacobs E, Price MR: Development of second generation monoclonal antibodies recognising Lewisy/b antigen by anti-idiotypic immunisation.

    Hybridoma 1993, 12:647-660. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  8. Elston CW, Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

    Histopathology 1991, 19:403-410. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  9. Ellis IO, Galea M, Broughton N, Locker A, Blamey RW, Elston CW: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up.

    Histopathology 1992, 20:479-489. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  10. Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Galea M, O'Rouke S, Blamey RW, Elston CW: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up.

    Histopathology 1994, 24:41-47. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  11. Todd JH, Dowle C, Williams MR, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Hinton CP, Blamey RW, Haybittle JL: Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer.

    Br J Cancer 1987, 56:489-492. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  12. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO: The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

    Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992, 22:207-219. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP: Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens.

    Nat Med 1998, 4:844-847. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Madjd Z, Durrant LG, Bradley R, Spendlove I, Ellis IO, Pinder SE: Loss of CD55 is associated with aggressive breast tumors.

    Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10:2797-2803. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty KS Sr: Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies.

    Arch Pathol Lab Med 1985, 109:716-721. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  16. Steplewska-Mazur K, Gabriel A, Zajecki W, Wylezol M, Gluck M: Breast cancer progression and expression of blood group-related tumor-associated antigens.

    Hybridoma 2000, 19:129-133. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Tauchi K, Kakudo K, Machimura T, Makuuchi H, Mitomi T: Immunohistochemical studies of blood group-related antigens in human superficial esophageal carcinomas.

    Cancer 1991, 67:3042-3050. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  18. Garrigues J, Anderson J, Hellstrom KE, Hellstrom I: Anti-tumor antibody BR96 blocks cell migration and binds to a lysosomal membrane glycoprotein on cell surface microspikes and ruffled membranes.

    J Cell Biol 1994, 125:129-142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Klinger M, Farhan H, Just H, Drobny H, Himmler G, Loibner H, Mudde GC, Freissmuth M, Sexl V: Antibodies directed against Lewis-Y antigen inhibit signaling of Lewis-Y modified ErbB receptors.

    Cancer Res 2004, 64:1087-1093. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Abd El-Rehim DM, Pinder SE, Paish CE, Bell JA, Rampaul RS, Blamey RW, Robertson JF, Nicholson RI, Ellis IO: Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma.

    Br J Cancer 2004, 91:1532-1542. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Flieger D, Hoff AS, Sauerbruch T, Schmidt-Wolf IG: Influence of cytokines, monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapeutic drugs on epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and LewisY antigen expression.

    Clin Exp Immunol 2001, 123:9-14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Tolcher AW, Sugarman S, Gelmon KA, Cohen R, Saleh M, Isaacs C, Young L, Healey D, Onetto N, Slichenmyer W: Randomized phase II study of BR96-doxorubicin conjugate in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

    J Clin Oncol 1999, 17:478-484. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Saleh MN, Sugarman S, Murray J, Ostroff JB, Healey D, Jones D, Daniel CR, LeBherz D, Brewer H, Onetto N, et al.: Phase I trial of the anti-Lewis Y drug immunoconjugate BR96-doxorubicin in patients with lewis Y-expressing epithelial tumors.

    J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:2282-2292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Scott AM, Geleick D, Rubira M, Clarke K, Nice EC, Smyth FE, Stockert E, Richards EC, Carr FJ, Harris WJ, et al.: Construction, production, and characterization of humanized anti-Lewis Y monoclonal antibody 3S193 for targeted immunotherapy of solid tumors.

    Cancer Res 2000, 60:3254-3261. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Co MS, Baker J, Bednarik K, Janzek E, Neruda W, Mayer P, Plot R, Stumper B, Vasquez M, Queen C, et al.: Humanized anti-Lewis Y antibodies: in vitro properties and pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys.

    Cancer Res 1996, 56:1118-1125. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  26. Pereira H, Pinder SE, Sibbering DM, Galea MH, Elston CW, Blamey RW, Robertson JF, Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma.

    Histopathology 1995, 27:219-226. PubMed Abstract OpenURL