Table 1 |
||||
|
Changes in age-adjusted incident rates of DCIS and/or CIS between 1980–2002 |
||||
|
USA [8] |
England [9] |
Switzerland [10] |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Year |
DCISa |
CISb |
DCISc |
CISc |
|
|
||||
|
1980 |
4.0 |
|||
|
1980–82 |
2.4 |
4.8 |
||
|
1983 |
5.0 |
|||
|
1983–85 |
1.8 |
3.6 |
||
|
1984 |
7.8 |
|||
|
1986–88 |
3.2 |
5.2 |
||
|
1989–91 |
7.3 |
10.6 |
||
|
1992 |
23.8 |
6.5 |
||
|
1992–94 |
7.9 |
10.4 |
||
|
1995 |
28.8 |
6.8 |
||
|
1998 |
38.0 |
9.4 |
||
|
1999 |
10.5 |
|||
|
2001 |
37.8 |
11.6 |
||
|
2002 |
12.0 |
|||
|
|
||||
|
aAdjusted to US population in 2000; badjusted to European standard population; cadjusted to population in US 1970 census. CIS, carcinoma in situ; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ. |
||||
|
Kumar et al. Breast Cancer Research 2005 7:271 doi:10.1186/bcr1346 |
||||