|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 3.
Morphological features and PR immunostaining in tumors treated with asPR or scPR for
5 days. Left column: control mice treated with saline; middle column: mice treated
with scPR; right column: mice treated with asPR. (a–c) Hematoxylin and eosin (100×); (d-f) Hematoxylin and eosin (400×); (g–i) 5-BrdU immunocytochemistry; (j–l) TUNEL (100×); (m-o) PR immunohystochemistry. No changes were observed in tumors from animals treated with
saline or scPR. Tumors from animals treated with asPR exhibit increasing degrees of
fibrosis, as well as occasional lymphocytic infiltration. TUNEL staining, indicative
of apoptosis, was only observed in asPR-treated tumors (panel i), in which also very
few 5-BrdU stained nuclei were observed (panel f). Few PR stained nuclei are observed
in asPR-treated tumors (panel l) as compared with control or scPR-treated tumors,
in which most of the cells are positive (panels j and k, respectively). asPR, antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides to progesterone receptors; PR, progesterone receptor; scPR,
scrambled oligodeoxynucleotides to progesterone receptors; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase mediated dUTP nick-end labeling.
Lamb et al. Breast Cancer Research 2005 7:R1111 doi:10.1186/bcr1345 |