Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

CYP17 gene polymorphism in relation to breast cancer risk: a case-control study

Kristjana Einarsdóttir1,2 email, Tove Rylander-Rudqvist3 email, Keith Humphreys1 email, Susanne Ahlberg4 email, Gudrun Jonasdottir1 email, Elisabete Weiderpass1,5 email, Kee Seng Chia6 email, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg4 email, Ingemar Persson1,7 email, Jianjun Liu2 email, Per Hall1 email and Sara Wedrén1,2,6 email

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Population Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore

Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Division of Molecular Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Cancer Registry of Norway, Montebello, Oslo, Norway

Centre for Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden

author email corresponding author email

Breast Cancer Research 2005, 7:R890-R896doi:10.1186/bcr1319

Published: 14 September 2005


See related commentary by Little and Simard http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/7/6/238

Abstract

Introduction

The c.1-34T>C 5' promoter region polymorphism in cytochrome P450c17 (CYP17), a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of estrogen, has been associated with breast cancer risk, but most previous studies have been relatively small.

Methods

We genotyped 1,544 incident cases of primary breast cancer and 1,502 population controls, all postmenopausal Swedish women, for the CYP17 c.1-34T>C polymorphism and calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regression models.

Results

No overall association was found between CYP17 c.1-34T>C and breast cancer risk, OR 1.0 (95% CI 0.8–1.3) for the A2/A2 (CC) carriers compared to the A1/A1 (TT) carriers, regardless of histopathology. We detected an interaction between CYP17 c.1-34T>C and age at menarche (P = 0.026) but regarded that as a chance finding as no dose-response pattern was evident. Other breast cancer risk factors, including menopausal hormone use and diabetes mellitus, did not modify the overall results.

Conclusion

It is unlikely that CYP17 c.1-34T>C has a role in breast cancer etiology, overall or in combination with established non-genetic breast cancer risk factors.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.