Table 2 |
||||||||
|
Demonstration LAD model consisting of nine positive and seven negative patterns on the support set of six genes |
||||||||
| Patterns |
Definition of patterns |
Patterns' coverages (prevalences) on training set |
||||||
|
|
||||||||
| AF018081 |
NM_003239 |
NM_004035 |
Contig26768_RC |
Contig15031_RC |
Contig27639_RC |
|||
|
|
||||||||
| Attr. 1 |
Attr. 2 |
Attr. 3 |
Attr. 4 |
Attr. 5 |
Attr. 6 |
Positive prevalence |
Negative prevalence |
|
|
|
||||||||
| P1 |
≤-0.014 |
>-0.106 |
≤0.055 |
22 (64.71%) |
0 |
|||
| P2 |
>-0.232, ≤0.0575 |
>-0.106 |
>-0.2305 |
17 (50%) |
0 |
|||
| P3 |
≤-0.0945 |
≤0.0915 |
>-0.1555 |
13 (38.24%) |
0 |
|||
| P4 |
>-0.12 |
>-0.1555, ≤-0.014 |
≤0.1145 |
12 (35.29%) |
0 |
|||
| P5 |
>-0.12, ≤0.0055 |
≤0.0575 |
≤0.1485 |
11 (32.35%) |
0 |
|||
| P6 |
>-0.2025 |
>-0.106, ≤0.0455 |
>-0.0065, ≤0.055 |
11 (32.35%) |
0 |
|||
| P7 |
>-0.08 |
>-0.0345 |
>-0.1555, ≤0.1445 |
9 (26.47%) |
0 |
|||
| P8 |
>0.071 |
>-0.106, ≤0.0775 |
>-0.1555 |
9 (26.47%) |
0 |
|||
| P9 |
>-0.319 |
>0.035 |
>-0.1555, ≤0.1445 |
6 (17.65%) |
0 |
|||
| N1 |
≤0.071 |
≤0.098 |
>0.0915 |
0 |
15 (34.09%) |
|||
| N2 |
>0.1145 |
≤0.037 |
0 |
15 (34.09%) |
||||
| N3 |
≤0.071 |
>0.0575 |
>-0.0635 |
0 |
14 (31.82%) |
|||
| N4 |
≤-0.106 |
0 |
13 (29.55%) |
|||||
| N5 |
>-0.014 |
≤-0.1555 |
0 |
12 (27.27%) |
||||
| N6 |
>-0.1335, ≤0.098 |
>0.055 |
≤0.037 |
0 |
11 (25%) |
|||
| N7 |
>-0.319 |
>0.035 |
>0.055, ≤0.1485 |
0 |
7 (15.91%) |
|||
|
|
||||||||
|
LAD, logical analysis of data. |
||||||||
|
Alexe et al. Breast Cancer Research 2006 8:R41 doi:10.1186/bcr1512 |
||||||||
