Table 2

Demonstration LAD model consisting of nine positive and seven negative patterns on the support set of six genes

Patterns
Definition of patterns
Patterns' coverages (prevalences) on training set





AF018081
NM_003239
NM_004035
Contig26768_RC
Contig15031_RC
Contig27639_RC





Attr. 1
Attr. 2
Attr. 3
Attr. 4
Attr. 5
Attr. 6
Positive prevalence
Negative prevalence

P1

≤-0.014
>-0.106

≤0.055

22 (64.71%)
0
P2

>-0.232, ≤0.0575
>-0.106


>-0.2305
17 (50%)
0
P3

≤-0.0945


≤0.0915
>-0.1555
13 (38.24%)
0
P4
>-0.12
>-0.1555, ≤-0.014


≤0.1145

12 (35.29%)
0
P5
>-0.12, ≤0.0055
≤0.0575


≤0.1485

11 (32.35%)
0
P6
>-0.2025

>-0.106, ≤0.0455

>-0.0065, ≤0.055

11 (32.35%)
0
P7
>-0.08


>-0.0345

>-0.1555, ≤0.1445
9 (26.47%)
0
P8
>0.071

>-0.106, ≤0.0775


>-0.1555
9 (26.47%)
0
P9

>-0.319

>0.035

>-0.1555, ≤0.1445
6 (17.65%)
0
N1
≤0.071


≤0.098
>0.0915

0
15 (34.09%)
N2




>0.1145
≤0.037
0
15 (34.09%)
N3
≤0.071
>0.0575
>-0.0635



0
14 (31.82%)
N4


≤-0.106



0
13 (29.55%)
N5

>-0.014



≤-0.1555
0
12 (27.27%)
N6



>-0.1335, ≤0.098
>0.055
≤0.037
0
11 (25%)
N7

>-0.319

>0.035
>0.055, ≤0.1485

0
7 (15.91%)

LAD, logical analysis of data.

Alexe et al. Breast Cancer Research 2006 8:R41   doi:10.1186/bcr1512