Table 2

Cox regression analysis for breast cancer death for all patients (n = 179 to 200)


Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis




RR
95 percent CI
P
RR
95 percent CI
P

Age, ≥55 years versus <55 years
0.86
0.51–1.44
0.57



Tumor type (overall effect)


0.14



     Lobular (versus ductal)
0.56
0.30–1.06
0.074



     Other (versus ductal)
0.66
0.26–1.67
0.38



Tumor size (overall effect)


0.001


0.002
     pT2 (versus pT1)
2.22
1.17–4.20
0.014
1.94
0.99–3.82
0.054
     pT3–pT4 (versus pT1)
4.17
1.93–9.01
0.0003
4.44
1.95–10.1
0.0004
Lymph node status (overall effect)


0.035


0.027
     pN1 (versus pN0)
1.34
0.69–2.62
0.39
1.09
0.54–2.21
0.81
     pN2–pN3 (versus pN0)
3.42
1.82–6.41
0.0001
2.73
1.41–5.30
0.003
     Othera (versus pN0)
1.69
0.77–3.67
0.19
1.28
0.51–3.20
0.60
Histological grade (overall effect)


0.47



     G2 (versus G1)
0.99
0.39–2.50
0.98



     G3 (versus G1)
1.43
0.52–3.90
0.49



TP53 mutation (versus wild type)
4.51
2.69–7.56
<0.0001
5.24
3.03–9.07
<0.0001
ER positive (versus negative)
0.72
0.43–1.22
0.23



PR positive (versus negative)
0.82
0.49–1.36
0.44




aLymph nodes not removed. 95 percent CI, 95 percent confidence interval for relative risk; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor;P, P value for the hypothesis of no effect; RR, relative risk (hazard ratio).

Langerød et al. Breast Cancer Research 2007 9:R30   doi:10.1186/bcr1675

Open Data