Table 3

Clinicopathological characteristics and discrepant HER2 FISH status between primary tumour and distant metastasis

Case no.
Age (years)
Clinicopathological characteristics
HER2 status


Tumour size (cm)
Histology
Gradea
Metastatic
Metastases
Primary tumour
Explanationb

1
34
1.0
Ductal
3
Pleura
Amplified
Negative
True discrepancy
2
52
Not available
Ductal
3
Cerebrospinal fluid
Amplified
Negative
True discrepancy
3
65
2.5
Ductal
3
Pleura
Amplified
Negative
True amplification
4
52
1.6
Ductal
3
Pleura
Negative
Amplified
True amplification
5
47
1.8
Ductal
3
Ascites
Negative
Amplified
Borderline
6
47
Not available
Ductal
3
Pleura
Negative
Amplified
True amplification
7
82
5.2
Ductal
2
Pleura
Negative
Amplified
Borderline
8
62
2.5
Ductal
3
Lung
Negative
Amplified
True negative

HER2, gene encoding human EGF-like receptor 2; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; true discrepancy, discrepancy remained unexplained; true amplification, amplification was found both in the metastasis and in the primary tumour after review; true negative, amplification was not confirmed after review; borderline, discrepancy was explained by interpretational difficulty due to a HER2/CEP17 ratio close to the threshold of 2 or less. aNuclear grade (1 to 3); bexplanations for the discrepancies of HER2 status.

Tapia et al. Breast Cancer Research 2007 9:R31   doi:10.1186/bcr1676

Open Data