Table 3 |
||||
|
Adjusted odds ratiosa and 95% confidence intervals for dichotomized dietary intakeb by family history category |
||||
|
Sporadic or familial family history (n = 90) |
Hereditary family history (n = 67) |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Median (g) |
Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) |
Median (g) |
Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) |
|
|
|
||||
|
Protein |
||||
|
∘ Low |
76.2 |
1.0 |
77.6 |
1.0 |
|
∘ High |
93.5 |
3.0 (1.3–6.9) |
91.0 |
0.4 (0.1–1.4) |
|
∘ P value for interactionc |
<0.001 |
|||
|
Animal protein |
||||
|
∘ Low |
51.6 |
1.0 |
49.0 |
1.0 |
|
∘ High |
66.4 |
4.3 (1.8–10.3) |
69.6 |
0.5 (0.1–1.5) |
|
∘ P value for interaction |
<0.001 |
|||
|
|
||||
|
aModels adjusted for age, body mass index, caloric intake, age at menarche, menopausal status, hormone therapy use, and vitamin D intake. bDichotomized at median value. cP value for interaction was obtained by including in the model of a dichotomized dietary variable x family history category interaction term. |
||||
|
Tseng et al. Breast Cancer Research 2007 9:R72 doi:10.1186/bcr1781 |
||||
