|
| This article is part of the supplement: VII Madrid Breast Cancer Conference: Changes in the treatment of breast cancerPoster presentationDo breast cancer tumours downsize as well as downgrade with neoadjuvant chemotherapy?1Department of Surgery (Breast Firm), Chase Farm Hospital, London, UK 2Department of Oncology, Chase Farm Hospital, London, UK Madrid, Spain. 20–22 June 2007 Breast Cancer Research 2007, 9(Suppl 1):P3doi:10.1186/bcr1709 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/9/S1/P3
© 2007 BioMed Central Ltd ObjectiveNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) is increasingly being used for large primary breast carcinomas with the aim of improving breast-conservation surgery (BCS) rates. This study was conducted to assess the tumour response following NC. MethodsIn this retrospective study over a 4-year period, 61 women with large operable invasive breast cancers (T2–4 N0–2 M0), unsuitable for BCS, were consecutively treated with NC (5-FU, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and Taxotere). Pathological response was monitored, comparing original core biopsy histology with final excisional histology. ResultsThe mean age of patients was 48.6 years (range 30–70). Of the 61 patients, BCS was achieved in 48 (79%) patients. On the core biopsy, four (6.5%) patients had grade I cancer, 26 (43%) had grade II cancer and 31 (51%) had grade III cancer. Final histology showed no invasive cancer in eight (13%) patients (seven DCIS, and complete pathological response in one patient). In the rest of the patients, four (6.5%) had grade I tumours, 26 (43%) had grade II tumours and 23 (38%) had grade III tumours. Overall, 14 patients (23%) showed a decrease in histological grade (see Table 1). Seven patients (11.5%) had a higher grade than the initial core. ConclusionIn our series of patients receiving NC for breast cancer, there is not only a significant downsizing (permitting BCS) but also a trend of downgrading of the tumour, and this is seen particularly in poorly differentiated tumours. The higher grade on final histology compared with the core could be due to an unrepresentative core biopsy in large tumours prior to NC. Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |



on Google Scholar




