<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>bcr1431</ui>
   <ji>BCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Oral Presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Image-guided biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Vinayagam</snm>
               <fnm>R</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Gill</snm>
               <fnm>P</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>University Hospital North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Breast Cancer Research</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>Symposium Mammographicum 2006</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
            <url>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/pdf/bcr1431.pdf</url>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>Symposium Mammographicum 2006</p>
            </title>
            <location>Bournemouth, UK</location>
            <date-range>9&#8211;11 July 2006</date-range>
            <url>http://www.sympmamm.org.uk/</url>
         </conference>
         <issn>1465-5411</issn>
         <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
         <volume>8</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 1</issue>
         <fpage>P16</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/bcr1431</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>10</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2006</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Aims</p>
         </st>
         <p>To audit the accuracy of radiographers taking stereotactic core biopsies. To study whether cluster morphology influences calcium retrieval rates. To compare radiological opinion against histological findings.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods and materials</p>
         </st>
         <p>Retrospective analysis of all stereotactic 14G core biopsies performed in a Breast Screening Unit over an 18-month period (January 2004&#8211;June 2005). Usage of department database, mammograms and case notes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Of 300 biopsies, 264 were performed by radiographers. All cases had specimen radiography. The calcium retrieval rate was 80% in early 2004 and 95% by the end of July 2005.</p>
         <p>The calcifications were classified into cluster, tiny cluster and scattered cluster, according to the mammographic appearances. In the negative biopsies they were 32%, 43% and 25%, respectively.</p>
         <p>The comparison between the radiologist opinion against the final core biopsy results shows 90% concordance with pathology for opinions 2 and 5, and 75% for opinions 3 and 4.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Calcium retrieval rates for radiographers initially matched, then exceeded, those for radiologists. They also showed a steady improvement during the study period, rising to 95%. The cluster morphology did influence the calcium retrieval rate. There was a good concordance of radiology and pathology opinion.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
</art>
