bcr1844 BCJ Research article <p>Clinical significance of Akt and HER2/neu overexpression in African-American and Latina women with breast cancer</p> Wu Yanyuan yanyuanwu@cdrewu.edu Mohamed Hezla hezlamohamed@cdrewu.edu Chillar Ram ramchillar@cdrewu.edu Ali Ishrat ishratali@cdrewu.edu Clayton Sheila sheilaclayton@cdrewu.edu Slamon Dennis DSlamon@mednet.ucla.edu Vadgama V Jaydutt javadgam@cdrewu.edu

Divisions of Cancer Research and Training, Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine

Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1731 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA

David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Department of Pathology, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1731 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA

Department of Surgery, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1731 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine,10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095

 Breast Cancer Research 1465-5411 2008 10 1 R3 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/10/1/R3 18184439 10.1186/bcr1844 20 6 2007 31 7 2007 2 11 2007 10 1 2008 10 1 2008 2008 Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Introduction

Breast cancer patients with HER2/neu overexpression have poor outcomes with a decrease in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. The biology of HER2/neu overexpression in breast tumors in African-American and Latina women is poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to understand the clinical significance of activated Akt (phospho-Akt or pAkt) expression in breast tumors from African-American and Latina patients with corresponding tissue HER2/neu overexpression. Cellular and molecular studies have shown that activation of the cell signaling phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt cascade via the HER2/neu and other receptor tyrosine kinases induces cell proliferation.

Methods

A total of 234 African-American and Latina patients were selected retrospectively. From this group, 141 tumor tissue samples were analyzed for tissue pAkt by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This cohort consisted of 46 HER2/neu-positive (3+ by IHC) and 95 HER2/neu-negative tumors. The prognostic value of activated tissue Akt in relation to HER2/neu overexpression for DFS was determined.

Results

Patients with low pAkt and HER2-negative tumors had the best DFS. As expected, HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors with low pAkt had a decrease in DFS. Similarly, those with high pAkt and HER2-negative tumors also had poor DFS. However, those with an increase in both HER2 and pAkt had the worst DFS. An increase in pAkt was significantly associated with HER2/neu-positive and lymph node-positive breast tumors. Tumors with high HER2 and high pAkt were metastatic. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, in addition to the common risk factors such as larger tumor size, lymph node involvement, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative tumors, and HER2/neu-positive tumors, overexpression of pAkt significantly was associated with a decrease in 5-year DFS. A decrease in DFS with an increase in pAkt was observed in both HER2/neu-positive and -negative groups. However, the DFS was similar between HER2/neu-positive/pAkt-negative and HER2/neu-negative/pAkt-positive groups.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that there may be differences in tumor phenotypes within the HER2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer patients. The overexpression of pAkt may be a powerful prognostic marker for predicting DFS and overall survival of breast cancer patients.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common non-dermatologic cancer among American women and ranks second among cancer deaths in women. Although breast cancer survival has improved over the last 30 years, unexplained cancer-related health disparities still remain between African-Americans and Caucasians. People with low socioeconomic status still have the highest rates of both new tumors and cancer deaths. African-Americans are at a higher risk to die from cancer than are other ethnic groups 1 . Several factors have been demonstrated to contribute to poor outcome in African-American women. Most often, late stage at diagnosis has been a significant contributor. Breast cancer also is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic/Latina (Latina) women, even though breast cancer incidence and mortality in Latina women were not as high as those of African-American and Caucasian women. Despite recent increases in screening rates, breast cancer still tends to be diagnosed at a later stage in many Latina women, when treatment options are more limited. Uninsured Latina women are two to three times more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage 2 . Our medical center is located in South Central Los Angeles and serves primarily underserved populations, mainly African-American and Latina patients. Eighty percent of these African-American and Latina women had no health insurance. Earlier studies from our laboratory have shown that the age of onset of breast cancer for Latina women is younger than for African-Americans (48 versus 53 years) and that both of them have advanced stage III/IV disease at the time of diagnosis and had poor disease outcome 3 .

In general, the association between poor survival and differences with tumor phenotypes is not well understood in minority women with breast cancer. There is a need to develop novel or better therapeutic strategies in the management of breast cancer in African-American and Latina women. Significant research efforts are ongoing to better understanding the molecular basis of breast cancer and the discovery of molecular markers that could predict reliable prognostic or treatment outcome 4 5 6 7 . Experimental studies have suggested that overexpression of different growth factor receptors in breast cancer mediates different cell signaling pathways and makes the cancer cells become less responsive to treatment. These receptors include insulin-like growth factor receptor and members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family, such as HER1 (EGFR) and HER2 8 9 10 11 .

HER2/neu (also called c-erbB2), a cell-surface membrane receptor, has been identified and recognized to be significantly associated with breast cancer recurrence and death in the last two decades. In general, about 20% to 30% of breast cancer patients are diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer that is associated with overexpression of the HER2/neu protein and its gene. HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors frequently become resistant to treatment with tamoxifen and/or chemotherapy 12 13 14 15 . Current treatment regimens combining trastuzumab (Herceptin) with paclitaxel and/or docetaxel 16 17 have shown increased response rate. However, greater than 70% of patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors show poor response to treatment 18 19 ; in these patients, the overall survival (OS) and the time to relapse are significantly shorter 17 .

Several mechanisms that explain the mode of resistance to therapy by the chemo agents alone or in combination with trastuzumab have been described 11 20 21 22 . The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and its associated protein kinase B (Akt) pathways are frequently activated upon stimulation of various receptor-mediated cellular signals 23 24 25 . The activation of this PI3K/Akt signaling in response to growth factor receptor activation leads to anti-apoptosis and pathogenesis of cancer 26 . The PI3K/Akt pathway can be activated by several growth factors: insulin-like growth factor, epidermal growth factor, cytokines, and the HER2/neu network. The activation of Akt results in the downstream regulation of target molecules: glycogen synthase kinase-3-beta 27 , Forkhead transcription factor 28 , caspase-9 29 , and pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bad 30 . The final outcome may result in cellular proliferation or anti-apoptosis 31 32 .

Recent studies using clinical specimens have shown that Akt protein is frequently activated in HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors and is associated with poor prognosis among tamoxifen-treated patients 33 34 35 36 37 . Studies on Akt status in relation to prognosis of breast cancer were mostly focused on patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors treated with hormone therapy 35 36 . There is limited information on Akt status in patients with ER-negative tumors and the predictive value of Akt on those breast cancer patients. In addition, most of these studies were done in either Caucasian or Asian patients 34 35 36 . In contrast, there is a dearth of studies on clinical outcome in African-American and Latina patients with tissue HER2/neu overexpression with a corresponding increase in activated Akt at the time of initial diagnosis. From our early studies, we have observed that an increased level of plasma HER2/neu in both African-American and Latina women with breast cancer who underwent surgery and completed chemotherapy was associated with poor outcome and a reduction in disease-free survival (DFS) 3 .

In the present study, we hypothesized that a subgroup of patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer will also demonstrate an increase in activated Akt in their tumors. These patients will be resistant to chemotherapy and consequently this group of patients will have a shorter DFS and a poor OS. The activation of Akt in breast tumors could be a potential biologic factor that may partially explain the worse outcome in those minority women with breast cancer. Hence, our primary goals were (a) to test whether pAkt overexpression in HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors led to poor outcome compared with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors but with normal or low levels of pAkt, (b) to compare them to levels of pAkt in HER2/neu-negative tumors, and (c) to focus on African-American and Latina patients at our medical center, where these two populations have similar socioeconomic status and access to care. We have postulated that the overexpression of pAkt will lead to poor outcome irrespective of ethnic or racial differences. We studied a total of 141 patients. The 5-year DFS and the relative risk (RR) of reducing 5-year DFS were estimated in these minority patients with HER2/neu-positive and -negative and with or without pAkt in their tumors. Finally, we have correlated pAkt levels according to the tumor subtypes and we determined DFS rates.

Materials and methods

Patients

In this study, we were unable to include Caucasians. This is primarily due the fact that the majority of our patient populations at our medical center in South Central Los Angeles are poor and underserved African-American and Latina patients. The Caucasian population is less than 2.0% and therefore we are unable to generate a meaningful sample size.

Patients included in this study were self-reported as African-American and Latina women with breast cancer and had undergone surgery. They were treated with chemo or adjuvant chemotherapy at King/Drew Medical Center between 1999 and 2005. Approval from the institution review board was obtained before initiating the study. Presurgical information, tumor pathology and histology (that is, TNM [tumor, node, metastasis] staging, HER2/neu status, and ER or progesterone receptor [PR] status), and treatment protocol as well as disease outcome were compiled on patients from our prospective database. The ER/PR status and HER2/neu status reported in patient pathology reports were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and provided by Impath, the Cancer Information Company (Los Angeles, CA, USA). ER/PR-positive status was considered as more than 5% staining in cell nuclei; otherwise, ER and/or PR status was considered as negative. The expression of HER2/neu protein determined by IHC was also obtained according to the pathologist's interpretation of the IHC stain. The IHC stain was performed by the same central laboratory that performed the ER/PR assays. The IHC was performed with the DAKO HERCEPTest 38 and scored on a qualitative scale from 0 to 3+. The staining intensities are defined as 3+ positive, which means a strong complete membrane staining in more than 10% of tumor cells; 2+ positive, which is a weak to moderate complete membrane staining in more than 10% of tumor cells; 1+ positive, which is faint or barely perceptible partial membrane staining in more than 10% of tumor cells; and 0 positive, no staining is observed or membrane staining is observed in less than 10% of tumor cells. The HER2/neu status was defined as positive (HER2/neu 3+ determined by IHC) or negative (included HER2/neu 2+ and 1+/negative determined by IHC) in this study.

Patients included in this study were also required to have pathologically confirmed ductal or lobular breast carcinoma. We excluded those whose breast cancer was not primary cancer, had no detailed information on their tumor pathology, and had not completed treatment protocol for other than clinical reasons. Each patient included in this study had given their informed consent.

We selected cases (with paraffin blocks) that had known corresponding HER2/neu information and whose paraffin slides for tumor tissue contained more than 10% tumor cells. A total of 141 patients fulfilled our criteria and were retrospectively selected. The number of African-American patients was 72 and the number of Latina patients was 69. In this cohort of 141 breast cancer patients, 113 had invasive ductal (106) or lobular (7) carcinoma and 28 of them had ductal carcinoma in situ (26) or lobular carcinoma in situ (2). We had follow-up information on all 141 patients.

Determination of pAkt expression by immunohistochemistry

To perform IHC on human paraffin tissue samples, 4-μ sections were placed onto poly-prep slides (P0425; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and dried at 60°C for 1 hour. The sections were deparaffinized and hydrated in 100% ethanol followed by 95% ethanol. For antigen retrieval, paraffin tissue sections were treated with sodium citrate (10 mM, pH 6.0) for 10 minutes at 95°C and then cooled for 30 minutes at room temperature. Immunostaining was performed by using a Vectastain Universal elite ABC kit (PK-6200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Each tissue section was blocked with 5% normal horse serum for 30 minutes followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with antibodies specific for phosphor-Akt (Ser473) (pAkt) (#9271; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and total Akt (#9272; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). Immunostaining was visualized with a streptavidin peroxidase reaction using the DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) kit (SK-4100; Vector Laboratories). The nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin before mounting. Negative-control tests were conducted with samples in the absence of primary antibody. Similarly, control paraffin slides with known negative or positive expression of pAkt (IHC confirmed and antibody supplied by vendor) were tested alongside the unknown samples.

Before testing the paraffin tissues for pAkt by IHC, the sensitivity and specificity of pAkt antibody were tested and validated using human breast cancer cell lines obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA), such as SKBR3 (overexpressing HER2/neu) and MCF7 (expressing moderate levels of HER2/neu). The pAkt levels in SKBR3 and MCF7 were determined by IHC first and then further confirmed by Western blot analysis (Figure 1). A consistent correlation was observed between IHC and Western blot analysis with respect to the level of pAkt expression in SKBR3 and MCF7 cells. We have also compared the staining level on tumor and non-tumor sections from the same patient. Figure 2 demonstrates a paired tissue section from a patient with moderately differentiated infiltrating duct carcinoma who underwent modified radical mastectomy. Figures 2a and 2b are from a tumor and adjacent biopsy cavity that contained in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma and had a clear IHC stain in the cytoplasm. Figures 2c and 2d are from uninvolved breast tissues adjacent to the biopsy cavity and had no or very light stain.

<p>Figure 1</p>

pAkt expression in human breast cancer cells determined by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis

pAkt expression in human breast cancer cells determined by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. (a) Immunohistochemistry of pAkt expression in SKBR3 and MCF7 cells: (i) SKBR3 cells stained with pAkt (Ser473) antibody, (ii) SKBR3 cells stained with secondary antibody only (negative control), (iii) MCF7 cells stained with pAkt (Ser473) antibody, and (iv) MCF7 cells stained with secondary antibody only. The arrows indicate very strong pAkt stain in the cytoplasm and nuclear areas of SKBR3 cells, whereas light pAkt stain was observed in the cytoplasm of MCF7 cells. (b) Western blot analysis on total protein from SKBR3 or MCF7 cells using antibodies directed against pAkt (Ser473) (top panel) and total Akt (bottom panel).

 <p>Figure 2</p>

pAkt expression in tumor and uninvolved tumor tissue from the same patient examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC)

pAkt expression in tumor and uninvolved tumor tissue from the same patient examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Low-power (a) and high-power (b) images from the same tissue section contained in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma and had clear IHC stain in the cytoplasm. Low-power (c) and high-power (d) images from the same tissue section without tumor had no or light staining.

Quantification of immunohistochemistry results

The pAkt expression was detected in the cytoplasm by IHC. A mixed cytoplasm and nuclear staining was observed in a few cases. The pAkt protein expression was first evaluated using microscopy by two investigators independently without any prior knowledge of clinical information and pathological parameters. The stain color and intensity ranged from light to dark brown. We have scored the intensity of staining as 3+ positive (very strong), 2+ positive (clear staining but not as strong as 3+), 1+ positive (some lighter staining), and negative (no staining) (Figure 3). Next, the pAkt expression was quantified using DigiPro software (Labomed, Inc., Culver City, CA, USA) according to the percentage of tumor area with positive cytoplasm staining (positive staining tumor area divided by total tumor area). Each sample was randomized and quantified from five different areas on the tissue slide, and the mean of five different areas on the slide was calculated. The standard deviation (SD) was less than 2% for each. The distribution of mean area of pAkt-positive expression from those tissue samples was from 0% to 85% (Figure 4a). The quantification of IHC results of pAkt expression using both microscopy for intensity level and computer software for areas was confirmed by the clinical pathologist who was blinded to the origin of the tissue. There were few cases in which the pathologist disagreed with the initial scores. For those cases, we discussed them with the pathologist and then objectively re-scored them and re-confirmed them by two pathologists. In final the analysis, we developed the pAkt index by combining stain intensity in the cytoplasm of tumor cells and percentage of tumor cells with cytoplasm staining (intensity × positive area). The range of pAkt index for the majority of cases was from 0 (negative staining) to 174 (Figure 4b). The median level of the pAkt index was 36, and the pAkt index was 255 in one case only. In the following analysis, the level of pAkt expression was evaluated using the pAkt index either as a continuous variable directly or categorized as high pAkt (above the median level of the pAkt index, >36) and low pAkt (less than or equal to the median level, ≤ 36). The cutoff level was determined after reviewing different studies (Table 1) 33 36 37 39 40 41 42 43 and further validated by examining the non-tumor sections from the same patients in a total of 30 cases. The pAkt levels were either lower or undetectable in those non-tumor tissue sections, but not in tumor tissue sections (Figure 2). Overall, the pAkt index in those normal sections that had some level of IHC staining was 10.1 ± 4.7 (mean ± SD), the median level was 11, and the range was from 4 to 16.

<p>Figure 3</p>

The intensity of immunohistochemistry staining with pAkt in breast tissue

The intensity of immunohistochemistry staining with pAkt in breast tissue. (a) 3+ positive (intensity was very strong). (b) 2+ positive (clear stain but the intensity was not as strong as 3+). (c) 1+ positive (some light stain). (d) Negative (no stain). (a-d) Low-power images. (e-h) High-power images corresponding to (a-d), respectively.

 <p>Figure 4</p>

Distribution of pAkt expression

Distribution of pAkt expression. (a) pAkt level determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was quantified using DigiPro software (Labomed, Inc., Culver City, CA, USA) according to the percentage of tumor area with positive pAkt stain as mentioned in Materials and methods. The x-axis indicates the percentage of tumor area with positive stain. The range of the percentage of tumor area stained positive for pAkt was from 0% (negative stain) to 85% and was plotted at 5% intervals. The y-axis indicates the total number of cases at each of the 5% intervals. Each bar represents the total number of cases within the indicated percentage of tumor area which was positively stained by pAkt. (b) The box plot describes the distribution of pAkt index in 141 patients. The level of pAkt determined by IHC and quantified with DigiPro software represents pAkt index as stated in Materials and methods (pAkt index = intensity × percentage of tumor area with positive stain). The range of pAkt index in the 141 patients is described by the box plot. The median level of pAkt index was 36. The value 255 was one outlier.

 <p>Table 1</p>

Scoring pAkt expression determined by immunohistochemistry

Author/Reference

Method and cutoff level

Antibody (company)

Positive rate, type of cancer, (city)

Stål, et al. [37]

>10% strong staining in tumor cells

pAkt-Ser473 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY, USA)

27%, breast cancer, (Stockholm, Sweden)

Kirkegaard, et al. [36]

Above median level of histoscore (inter-quartile range)

pAkt-Ser473 (Biosource International, Camarillo, CA, USA)

51%, breast cancer, (Glasgow, UK)

Tokunaga, et al. [33]

≥ 10% of cytoplasm staining

pAkt-Ser473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA)

34%, breast cancer, (Fukuoka, Japan)

Messersmith, et al. [39]

Quantify by Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS II, Chromavision, Inc). (combination of staining color, density, and darkness) as a continuous variable

pAkt-Ser473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.)

High level in tumor, colorectal cancer, (Maryland, USA)

Bose, et al. [40]

Scoring as 0 to 2 according to intensity; 2 (overexpression) means staining more than normal cells

pAkt-Ser473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.)

36%, breast cancer, (Los Angeles, CA, USA)

Massarelli, et al. [41]

More than 15% cytoplasm staining

pAkt-Ser473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.)

46%, tongue cancer, (Houston, TX, USA)

Ogino, et al. [42]

Tumor cells were scored as negative or positive, using normal epithelial cells and lymphocytes as reference

pAkt-Ser473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.)

14%, colorectal cancer, (Boston, MA, USA)

Schmitz, et al. [43]

More than 45% tumor cells staining in nuclei

pAkt-Ser473 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA)

88%, breast cancer, (Essen, Germany)

Our study

Combination of staining intensity and percentage of tumor cells as pAkt index, according to quartiles of pAkt index

pAkt-Ser473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.)

50%, breast cancer, (Los Angeles)

Statistical analysis

All of the analyses were performed with a statistical package, SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). DFS was defined as the time from the day of diagnosis by tissue biopsy to the development of either local recurrence or distant metastases. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank testing were used to assess the DFS. The RR of reducing DFS was determined by Cox proportional hazard regression with multivariate analyses. The personal chi-square test was used to examine the statistically significant differences between activation of Akt and other known predictive markers (tumor size, node involvement, staging, grade, ER/PR status, and HER2/neu status). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Sample size

We have based the information of patients with HER2/neu status from our ongoing breast studies. The time of DFS in patients with HER2/neu-negative tumors was 4.3 years and in those with HER2/neu 3+ tumors was less than 3 years. To estimate the study power, we used Epi Infor 2000 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA), and PS-Power and Sample Size Calculation (Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA). We expected that patients with HER2/neu-positive and overexpressing pAkt would have a shorter DFS than those with HER2/neu-positive but low pAkt. To have 80% power with 95% confidence, the sample size should be 149. Therefore, the current sample size will provide approximately 80% power with 95% confidence.

Results

Evaluation of pAkt expression by immunohistochemistry

The pAkt antibody was tested using human breast cancer cell lines obtained from the ATCC. These were SKBR3 (overexpressing HER2/neu) and MCF7 (expressing low levels of HER2/neu). The pAkt levels in SKBR3 and MCF7 were determined by IHC first and then examined by Western blot analysis (Figure 1). A consistent correlation was observed between IHC and Western blot analysis with respect to the level of pAkt expression in SKBR3 and MCF7 cells. We have also compared the staining level in tumor and non-tumor sections from the same patient. Figure 2 demonstrates paired tissue sections from a patient with moderately differentiated infiltrating duct carcinoma who underwent modified radical mastectomy. Figures 2a and 2b are from a tumor and adjacent biopsy cavity that contained in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma and showed clear IHC staining in the cytoplasm. Figures 2c and 2d are from uninvolved breast tissues adjacent to the biopsy cavity and had no or very light stain.

We have evaluated different studies that have used the IHC scoring method for pAkt. The similarities and differences are documented in Table 1. From our study, we determined that both the intensity of the IHC staining of pAkt and the percentage of tumor cells stained with pAkt were necessary determinants for the scoring system. Similar methods were used by other investigators 36 39 . Hence, we developed a pAkt index by combining both intensity of IHC and percentage of tumor cells stained as stated in Materials and methods. To validate our scoring system, we examined non-tumor sections from the same patients in a total of 30 cases. The pAkt levels were either lower or undetectable in those non-tumor tissue sections, but not in tumor tissue sections. Figure 2 demonstrates one example. Overall, the pAkt index in those normal sections that had some level of IHC staining was 10.1 ± 4.7 (mean ± SD), the median level was 11, and the range was from 4 to 16.

Characteristics of patients and their tumor clinicopathology

Table 2 provides a description of our patients and their tumor characteristics. Overall, from a cohort of 141 patients, 51.1% were African-American and 48.9% were Latina. The difference in the number of subjects in the study was not statistically significant.

<p>Table 2</p>

Patient characteristics

Number

Percentage

P value

Total

141

100

Ethnicity

African-American

72

51.1

Latina

69

48.9

0.801

Age at diagnosis

<50 years

73

51.8

≥ 50 years

68

48.2

0.674

Tumor size

<5 cm

90

63.8

≥ 5 cm

51

36.2

0.001

Lymph node status

Positive

89

63.1

Negative

52

36.9

0.004

AJCC stage

0–II

88

62.4

III–IV

53

37.6

0.004

Histological grade

Well to moderately differentiated

43

30.5

Poorly differentiated

98

69.5

0.001

ER/PR status

ER/PR+

81

57.4

ER/PR-

60

42.6

0.086

HER2/neu status

Positive

46

32.6

Negative

95

67.4

0.001

pAkt level

High

71

50.4

Low

70

49.6

0.933

AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; ER/PR, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor; HER2/neu negative, HER2/neu 2+ and 1+ and negative; HER2/neu positive, HER2/neu 3+ determined by immunohistochemistry; pAkt level high, pAkt index of greater than 36 (median level); pAkt level low, pAkt index of less than or equal to 36.

Age

Fifty-one point eight percent of our subjects were under 50 years of age, whereas 48.2% were above 50 years of age. There was significant (p = 0.001 to 0.004) difference with the following parameters: tumor size, lymph node status, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, histological grade, and HER2/neu status. A larger number of tumors were less than 5 cm, whereas a greater number had positive lymph node metastasis (63.1%), AJCC stage between 0 and II (62.4%), and poorly differentiated tumors (69.5%), and 32.6% had HER2/neu-positive tumors. Fifty-seven point four percent had ER/PR+ status whereas 42.6% had ER/PR- status. This difference was not significant (p = 0.086). Overall, there was no significant difference between the numbers of patients with high pAkt (50.4%) compared to those with low pAkt (49.6%). The pAkt level is measured as pAkt index, and the cutoff value was 36. Please see Materials and methods for details on the estimation method for the pAkt index.

pAkt expression in relation to patient characteristics and tumor pathology

Next, we examined whether the pAkt levels could be correlated with patient characteristics and tumor pathology (Table 3). Overall, there was no statistical difference in the pAkt levels in tumor tissues between African-American and Latina patients. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the pAkt levels between patients under or above 50 years of age, with tumors smaller or larger than 5 cm, between AJCC stage below or above stage II, and those with ER/PR+ or ER/PR- tumors. In contrast, pAkt levels were significantly different in tumor tissues obtained from patients with lymph node metastasis and those with HER2/neu-positive tumors. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors also had higher pAkt levels, although the difference was not highly significant (p = 0.094). These data suggest that pAkt is elevated significantly only in tumor tissues from patients with lymph node metastasis and HER2/neu overexpression. We next examined the relationship between HER2/neu overexpression, pAkt overexpression, and 5-year DFS.

<p>Table 3</p>

pAkt expression in relation to patient characteristics and tumor pathology

Number

pAkt

P value

Median

Range

Total

141

36.0

0–255.0

Ethnicity

African-American

72

35.7

0–174.0

Latina

69

36.6

0–255.0

0.992

Age at diagnosis

<50 years

73

31.0

0–255.0

≥ 50 years

68

39.0

0–174.0

0.678

Tumor size

<5 cm

90

32.2

0–174.0

≥ 5 cm

51

36.6

0–255.0

0.117

Lymph node status

Positive

89

45.0

0–255.0

Negative

52

27.5

0–135.0

0.001

AJCC stage

0–II

88

33.3

0–174.0

III–IV

53

42.0

0–255.0

0.160

Histological grade

Well to moderately differentiated

44

30.0

0–174.0

Poorly differentiated

97

40.8

0–255.0

0.094

ER/PR status

ER/PR+

81

30.0

0–255.0

ER/PR-

60

47.3

0–170.0

0.164

HER2/neu status (IHC)

Positive

46

44.5

0–255.0

Negative

95

30.0

0–168.9

0.009

AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; ER/PR, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor; HER2/neu negative, HER2/neu 2+ and 1+ and negative determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC); HER2/neu positive, HER2/neu 3+ determined by IHC.

Five-year disease-free survival in relation to HER2/neu and pAkt status

The patients in this study were followed up for a mean of 4 years, and the time range of follow-up was 1 to 8 years. However, when the follow-up period exceeded 5 years, we counted and reported data only for the first 5 years. A recent review of cancer statistics confirms that African-American women with breast cancer have a shorter 5-year OS period 1 and premenopausal African-American women with breast cancer had a poorer prognosis than postmenopausal African-Americans 44 . However, the data on breast cancer prognosis in Latina women are limited. In our study, we had the distinct advantage of comparing the two ethnic groups who had similar socioeconomic status and access to care. In addition, there was no significant difference between our African-American and Latina patients with respect to their tumor pathology and stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Results from Kaplan-Meier survival analysis from Figure 5a confirm that there is no significant difference in 5-year DFS between African-American and Latina women with breast cancer. However, both groups had a poor 5-year DFS rate. Next, we examined whether the age at diagnosis had any influence on 5-year DFS. Our data showed no significant difference. This suggests that women in our study have similar 5-year DFS rates, irrespective of their age at diagnosis. The overall 5-year DFS rate was about 50%.

<p>Figure 5</p>

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with breast cancer

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with breast cancer. (a) Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing 5-year DFS between African-American (green) and Latina (fuchsia) women. (b) Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing 5-year DFS in African-American and Latina women between less than 50 years of age (green) and above 50 years of age (fuchsia) at the time of diagnosis. The differences between the curves were estimated by log-rank test, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Effect of HER2/neu status on 5-year disease-free survival

We found that the probability of 5-year DFS was reduced significantly in patients with HER2/neu-positive tumors (Figure 6a). The median DFS time was 3.9 years for patients with HER2/neu-negative tumors but only 2.8 years for those with HER2/neu-positive tumors. As stated in Materials and methods, HER2/neu status was measured by IHC methods and information was obtained from clinical pathology charts.

<p>Figure 6</p>

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with HER2/neu or pAkt status

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with HER2/neu or pAkt status. (a) Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the 5-year DFS between HER2/neu-positive (fuchsia) and HER2/neu-negative (green) tumors. (b) A similar comparison between high pAkt (fuchsia) and low pAkt (green) tumors in African-American and Latina women. The differences between the curves were estimated by log-rank test, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Effect of pAkt on 5-year disease-free survival

Table 3 had demonstrated that pAkt was significantly associated with an increase in HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors. We then examined whether the pAkt status had any influence on 5-year DFS and whether this association was directly linked to the HER/2neu status. Figure 6b shows that 5-year DFS was significantly reduced in patients with high pAkt compared with those with low pAkt. In comparison to patients with HER2/neu-negative tumors and with low pAkt levels, we observed the following: (a) HER2/neu overexpression led to a significant decrease in 5-year DFS, even in the presence of low pAkt; (b) high pAkt expression in the presence of HER2/neu-negative tumors led to a poorer 5-year DFS; and (c) those with both high pAkt and high HER2/neu tissue expression had the worst outcome, with a 5-year DFS rate of only 10% to 15% (Figure 7). The differences were highly significant at a p value of less than 0.0001 and with a log-rank value of 22.7.

<p>Figure 7</p>

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina patients with either high or low pAkt together with their HER2/neu status

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina patients with either high or low pAkt together with their HER2/neu status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the 5-year DFS among patients with low pAkt/HER2- (I, red), low pAkt/HER2+ (II, blue), high pAkt/HER2- (III, fuchsia), and high pAkt/HER2+ (IV, green). The differences between the curves were estimated by log-rank test, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. *p < 0.005, the indicated groups compared to group IV (high pAkt/HER2+). ^p = 0.03, between the indicated two groups.

Next, we evaluated the distant metastases and local recurrence rates within 5 years in these patients with different HER2/neu status and pAkt levels. Table 4 shows this evaluation. Overall, patients included in this study had 44% distant metastases and 7% local recurrence within 5 years. The frequency of distant metastases was significantly higher in patients with high pAkt group, regardless of their tumor HER2/neu status (Table 4). Patients whose breast tumors had both high HER2/neu and high pAkt1 (61.9%) had the highest association with distant metastases. Local recurrence was highest in patients with HER2/neu-positive tumors, independent of pAkt. However, these associations with local recurrence were not statistically significant, due to a lower number of patients with recurrence.

<p>Table 4</p>

pAkt level in relation to distant metastases and local recurrence

Distant metastases

P value

Local recurrence

P value

Yes (%)

No (%)

Yes (%)

No (%)

HER2+/High pAkt

61.9

38.1

0.007

12.5

87.5

0.259

HER2+/Low pAkt

21.4

78.6

18.2

81.8

HER2-/High pAkt

56.3

43.7

7.1

92.9

HER2-/Low pAkt

31.3

68.7

0

100

HER2+, HER2/neu 3+ determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC); HER2-, HER2/neu 2+ and 1+ and negative determined by IHC; High pAkt, pAkt level above median level (>36); Low pAkt, pAkt level of less than or equal to 36.

Since an increase in pAkt together with high HER2/neu expression was associated with tumor metastasis, we examined which factors would contribute most significantly to a reduction in 5-year DFS. We performed Cox regression with multivariate analysis to identify the RR of reducing 5-year DFS. Table 5 demonstrates that the following factors contribute significantly to a decrease in DFS: larger tumor size, positive lymph nodes, ER/PR-negative tumors, and HER2/neu-positive tumors. Most interestingly, in addition to these traditional risk factors, high pAkt was significantly associated (p < 0.006) with a decrease in 5-year DFS. Ethnicity (comparing African-American to Latina patients) and age (under or above 50 years) did not contribute to a decrease in 5-year DFS (Table 5).

<p>Table 5</p>

Estimation of relative risk of reduction of disease-free survival in African-American and Latina women with breast cancer using multivariate analysis

Relative risk

95% CI

P value

Tumor size (≥ 5 cm versus <5 cm)

2.1

1.4–4.0

0.03

Lymph node (positive versus negative)

2.2

1.0–4.8

0.05

ER/PR status (negative versus positive)

1.9

1.0–3.3

0.04

pAkt status (high versus low)

2.5

1.3–4.8

0.006

HER2/neu status (positive versus negative)

1.7

1.0–3.3

0.05

Age (<50 years versus ≥ 50 years)

0.9

0.5–1.7

0.54

Ethnicity (African-American versus Latina)

1.2

0.7–2.2

0.54

CI, confidence interval; ER/PR, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor; HER2/neu positive, HER2/neu 3+ examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC); HER2/neu negative, HER2/neu 2+ and HER2/neu 1+/negative by IHC; pAkt high, the pAkt index level above median level (>36); pAkt low, the pAkt index level less than or equal to median level (≤36).

pAkt in tumor subtypes and influence on 5-year disease-free survival

Recent studies have suggested that breast cancer patients with certain tumor subtypes may be more resistant to therapy and therefore show a decrease in DFS and OS. Given that pAkt overexpression is associated with a decrease in DFS, we then asked whether it is possible that certain tumor subtypes, classified according to their receptor status, would be more likely to overexpress pAkt and whether these subtypes may subsequently have a shorter DFS. Hence, we examined the effect of high and low pAkt on the following tumor subtypes: (a) luminal A (ER/PR+ and HER2-), (b) luminal B (ER/PR+ and HER2+), (c) ER/PR-/HER2+, and (d) basal-like (triple-negative, ER/PR, and HER2-).

Our data in Table 6 show the levels of pAkt (median pAkt index) in different tumor subtypes: luminal A (ER/PR and HER2-), 13.4; luminal B (ER/PR+ and HER2+), 42.3; ER/PR- and HER2+, 56.3; and basal-like (ER/PR- and HER2-), 35. These values suggest that pAkt levels are highest in ER/PR- and HER2+ tumors, followed by luminal B (ER/PR+ and HER2+), and basal-like (ER/PR- and HER2-) and are least in luminal A (ER/PR+ and HER2-). In comparison to luminal A type, the levels of pAkt were higher in luminal B and ER/PR-/HER2+ with statistical significance at a p value of less than or equal to 0.005, whereas the basal-like group was significant at a p value of 0.02.

<p>Table 6</p>

pAkt level in different subtypes of breast cancer

Subtype of breast cancer

Number

pAkt index (median)

P value

Luminal A (ER/PR+ and HER2-)

38

13.4

Luminal B (ER/PR+ and HER2+)

44

42.3

0.005

ER/PR- and HER2+

33

56.0

0.002

Basal-like (ER/PR- and HER2-)

26

35.0

0.02

P values were compared with the luminal A group. ER/PR, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor.

Next, we examined the relationship between 5-year DFS and low and high pAkt levels in patients classified under different tumor subtypes. Figure 8a (luminal A, ER/PR-, and HER2+) shows a significant difference in DFS between low and high pAkt (p = 0.0057 and log-rank = 7.64). Tumors with high pAkt had poor DFS. The luminal B subtype (ER/PR+ and HER2+) in Figure 8b showed poor DFS with both low and high pAkt levels. Although the difference was not statistically significant between the low and high pAkt groups, the overall DFS was considerably lower in tumors with high pAkt. Figure 9a shows ER/PR- with HER2+ subtype: In this group, patients with high pAkt had a very poor 5-year DFS (only 20%). In contrast, those with low pAkt had a DFS of almost 60%. The basal-like tumors (ER/PR- with HER2-) in Figure 9b showed poor but similar DFS rates between low and high pAkt levels. Hence, the difference was not statistically significant.

<p>Figure 8</p>

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with luminal A and luminal B subtypes of breast cancer versus different levels of pAkt

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with luminal A and luminal B subtypes of breast cancer versus different levels of pAkt. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the 5-year DFS between patients with high pAkt (fuchsia) and low pAkt (green) and with luminal A type of tumor (a) and luminal B type of tumor (b). The differences between the curves were estimated by log-rank test, and a p value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.

 <p>Figure 9</p>

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with ER/PR- and HER2+ and basal-like (ER/PR-HER2-) subtypes of breast cancer versus different levels of pAkt

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with ER/PR- and HER2+ and basal-like (ER/PR-HER2-) subtypes of breast cancer versus different levels of pAkt. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the 5-year DFS between patients with high pAkt (fuchsia) and low pAkt (green) and with ER/PR- and HER2+ tumor (a) and basal-like (ER/PR-/HER2-) tumor (b). The differences between the curves were estimated by log-rank test, and a p value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.

Next, we compared differences in DFS between the different tumor subtypes and within the high or low pAkt groups. Figure 10a shows the differences within the low pAkt group. The data suggest that, in comparison to the luminal A subtype (ER/PR+/HER2-), the 5-year DFS rate was lower in luminal B (ER/PR+/HER2+), ER/PR-/HER2+, and basal-like (ER/PR-/HER2-). The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.05) with the basal-like group. These observations demonstrate that basal-like tumors have the worse DFS, despite low levels of tissue pAkt. Next, when we compared the DFS rates among the patients with different tumor subtypes with high pAkt, we observed that all four subtypes had a very poor DFS rate (Figure 10b). However, the ER/PR-/HER2+ subtype had the worse outcome.

<p>Figure 10</p>

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with different levels of pAkt versus different types of breast cancer

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) in African-American and Latina women with different levels of pAkt versus different types of breast cancer. Patients were grouped as low pAkt (median level of pAkt index of less than or equal to 36) (a) and high pAkt (median level of pAkt index of greater than 36) (b). Then Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the 5-year DFS between patients with different subtypes of tumors: I, luminal A type of tumor (green); II, luminal B type of tumor (fuchsia); III, ER/PR- and HER2+ tumor (blue); and IV, basal-like type of tumor (red). The differences between the curves were estimated by log-rank test, and a p value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ER, estrogen receptor; N.S., no statistical significance between the curves; PR, progesterone receptor.

Discussion

Among the three human isoforms Akt1, Akt2, and Akt3, it has been suggested that Akt1 may have an important role in tumor initiation and tumor growth 45 46 47 48 . Breast cancer patients with high-grade tumors and late stage of diagnosis had activated Akt1 in their tumor cells and their disease had a poor outcome 49 . Furthermore, patients who had a poor outcome to endocrine therapy also had activated Akt1 in their tumor cells 32 . Akt2 frequently has been found to be upregulated in HER2/neu-positive breast tumors and may contribute to tumor aggressiveness and metastases 48 50 51 . Akt3 expression is exclusive to more advance and hormone-independent breast cancer cells 52 . In the present study, we used phosphor-Akt (Ser473) antibody, which detects Akt1 only when phosphorylated at serine 473 and which detects Akt2 and Akt3 only when phosphorylated at equivalent sites. Therefore, the activated pAkt in breast tumors in our patient cohort determined by IHC may not be limited to phosphorylation of Akt1 or Akt2 only. A study in 280 postmenopausal Swedish women with breast cancer indicated that expression of pAkt was significantly associated with both Akt1 and Akt2 staining; however, the correlation was stronger for Akt1 than for Akt2 37 . Another study in 402 ERα-positive breast cancer patients 36 showed clearly that cytoplasmic Akt1 and Akt3, but not Akt2, expression was correlated significantly with pAkt expression. We have also examined the association of pAkt in relation to Akt1 and Akt2 in our patient cohort. The mRNA levels of Akt1 and Akt2 were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in 60 samples. The results indicate that the pAkt protein expression was more associated with Akt1, and there was a significant correlation between Akt1 and Akt2 at the mRNA level (data not shown). Our results with different Akt isoforms are more in agreement with the Swedish study 37 . Studies with both Japanese and Swedish women with breast cancer indicated that activation of pAkt in breast cancer was more likely to be associated with ER/PR-negative tumors 34 37 .

The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is known to promote growth factor-mediated cell growth, proliferation, migration, and survival 53 54 55 56 57 . Activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by HER2/neu or other growth factors has been suggested to contribute to multidrug resistance in breast cancer 10 57 . In addition, the role of the PI3K/Akt pathway has been investigated in many different types of tumors, including oral, head and neck, and squamous cell tumors. All of these tumors are associated with poor prognosis 58 59 60 . Activation of Akt at serine 473 has been reported to induce resistance to chemotherapy and to tamoxifen treatment in Caucasian and Asian women with breast cancer 34 35 36 . Recently, the activation of Akt has been shown in Japanese as well as Caucasian women with HER2/neu-positive breast cancer 34 37 61 . Consequently, activation of Akt downstream of HER2/neu receptor may play a key role in the development of resistance to chemotherapy and to anti-HER2/neu receptor antibody, trastuzumab, in HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors.

Our study was designed to understand the interactions between activation of tissue Akt with and without corresponding overexpression of HER2/neu for assessment of disease outcome in African-American and Latina women with breast cancer. Similar to the data on Caucasian and Japanese women 34 37 61 , the expression of pAkt in breast tumors from African-American and Latina women in our study was significantly associated with HER2/neu-positive tumors. As mentioned in the Introduction and in Materials and methods, our medical center is located in South Central Los Angeles and serves primarily underserved populations, mainly African-American and Latina patients. Since the population of Caucasians served is less than 2%, we have not included this group in our study.

The numbers of African-American and Latina patients recruited in our study were fairly similar, and the two groups had similar socioeconomic status and access to care. Hence, we feel confident that our study minimizes possible discrepancies due to non-biological factors. The distribution of patients below or above 50 years of age was fairly similar in our cohort. With respect to tumor histopathology, there was a significant difference (p = 0.001 to 0.004) with the following parameters: a larger number of tumors were less than 5 cm, whereas a greater number had positive lymph node metastasis (63.1%), AJCC stage between 0 and II (62.4%), and poorly differentiated tumors (69.5%), and 32.6% had HER2/neu-positive tumors. Fifty-seven point four percent had ER/PR+ status whereas 42.6% had ER/PR- status. This difference was not significant (p = 0.086).

Overall, there was no statistical difference in the pAkt levels in tumor tissues between African-American and Latina patients. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the pAkt levels between patients under or above 50 years of age, with tumors smaller or larger than 5 cm, between AJCC stage below or above stage II, and those with ER/PR+ or ER/PR- tumors. In contrast, pAkt levels were significantly different in tumor tissues obtained from patients with lymph node metastasis and those with HER2/neu-positive tumors. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors also had higher pAkt levels, although the difference was not highly significant (p = 0.094). Similarly, the level of pAkt in patients with ER/PR-negative tumors was higher than in patients with ER/PR-positive tumors; however, this difference was not statistically significant (Table 3). Hence, our data confirm that pAkt is elevated significantly only in tumor tissues from patients with lymph node metastasis, HER2/neu overexpression, and possibly those with ER/PR-negative tumors.

As we examined the association between HER2/neu overexpression and increase in pAkt in our breast cancer patients, we discovered some unique features. First, more than 70% of patients with HER2/neu-positive tumors had overexpression of pAkt, and the high pAkt tumors were associated with positive lymph nodes. Although a similar study on women in Germany showed that 71% of pAkt-positive tumors were HER2/neu-positive, they had included both HER2/neu 2+ and 3+ positive patients. In addition, their study was conducted in patients with node-negative breast cancer 61 . The studies on Japanese and Swedish women 34 37 showed that 43% to 44% of HER2/neu-positive tumors had a corresponding increase in pAkt expression. The HER2/neu-positive tumors in the Japanese group included HER2/neu 2+ and 3+ as determined by IHC, and for Swedish group, the positive HER2/neu was determined using a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). In comparison, our study showed that more than 70% of African-American and Latina women with HER2/neu 3+ positive tumors had overexpression of pAkt in their tumors at the time of diagnosis. This is the highest degree of pAkt overexpression reported for any ethnic group. This observation leads us to speculate that pAkt overexpression in breast tumors from African-American and Latina women may be one important factor contributing to their overall decrease in DFS. Our data also demonstrate for the first time that patients with high pAkt but with HER2/neu-negative tumors also had poor 5-year DFS. Furthermore, multivariate analysis adjusted for traditional prognostic indicators such as lymph node involvement, tumor size, HER2/neu status, and ER/PR status demonstrated that pAkt level alone is a stronger predictor for a decrease in DFS.

Recent studies suggested that a high frequency of basal-like (ER/PR-/HER2-) breast cancer may contribute to the poor prognosis of young African-American women 44 . When we examined the 5-year DFS pattern with respect to pAkt levels in connection with HER2/neu status and with tumor subtypes, we discovered an interesting role for pAkt. In comparison to patients with HER2/neu-negative tumors and with low pAkt levels, we observed the following: (a) HER2/neu overexpression led to a significant decrease in 5-year DFS, even in the presence of low pAkt; (b) high pAkt expression in the presence of HER2/neu-negative tumors had poorer 5-year DFS; and (c) those with both high pAkt and high HER2/neu tissue expression had the worst outcome, with a 5-year DFS rate of only 10% to 15%. The differences were highly significant at a p value of less than 0.0001 and with a log-rank value of 22.7.

When we examined the association of pAkt with distant metastasis and local recurrence, we observed the following: In general, patients in our study had 44% distant metastases and 7% local recurrence within 5 years. We were surprised at such a low local recurrence rate. Interestingly, however, the frequency of distant metastases was significantly high in patients with high pAkt regardless of their tumor HER2/neu status. Patients whose breast tumors had both high HER2/neu and high pAkt had the highest association with distant metastases (61.9%). Local recurrence was highest in patients with HER2/neu-positive tumors, independent of pAkt. We believe that, in our current study, the association with local recurrence was not statistically significant, due to a smaller sample size of patients with local recurrence.

Next, we examined what factors would contribute to a decrease in 5-year DFS. Using Cox regression with multivariate analysis, we determined that the following contributed significantly: larger tumor size, positive lymph nodes, ER/PR-negative tumors, and HER2/neu-positive tumors. Most interestingly, in addition to these traditional risk factors, high pAkt was significantly associated (p < 0.006) with a decrease in 5-year DFS. Ethnicity (comparing African-American to Latina patients) and age (under or above 50 years) did not contribute to a decrease in 5-year DFS. Hence, between the African-American and Latina populations, ethnicity or race is not a significant contributor of poor DFS.

Perou and colleagues 62 and Sørlie and colleagues 63 elegantly demonstrated that breast carcinomas can also be subdivided based on gene expression analysis. However, it is unclear whether the DFS and OS rates in these different subtypes can be influenced by overexpression of pAkt. Given that pAkt overexpression is associated with a decrease in DFS, we then asked whether it is possible that certain tumor subtypes, classified according to their receptor status, would be more likely to overexpress pAkt and whether these subtypes may subsequently have a shorter DFS. We examined the effect of high and low pAkt on the following tumor subtypes: (a) luminal A (ER/PR+ and HER2-), (b) luminal B (ER/PR+ and HER2+), (c) ER/PR-/HER2+, and (d) basal-like (triple-negative, ER/PR, and HER2-). First, our data revealed that pAkt levels were highest in ER/PR- and HER2+ tumors, followed by luminal B (ER/PR+ and HER2+), and basal-like (ER/PR- and HER2-) and least in luminal A (ER/PR+ and HER2-). In comparison with luminal A type, the levels of pAkt were higher in luminal B and ER/PR-/HER2+ subtypes with statistical significance at a p value of less than or equal to 0.005. The basal-like group was significant at a p value of 0.02. Second, we examined the relationship between 5-year DFS and low and high pAkt levels in patients classified under different tumor subtypes. Luminal A tumors (ER/PR- and HER2+) showed a significant difference in DFS between low and high pAkt (p = 0.0057 and log-rank = 7.64). Tumors with high pAkt had poor DFS. Luminal B subtype (ER/PR+ and HER2+) also showed poor DFS with both low and high pAkt levels. Although the difference was not statistically significant between the low and high pAkt groups, the overall DFS was considerably lower in tumors with high pAkt. In the ER/PR-/HER2+ subtype, patients with high pAkt had a very poor 5-year DFS (only 20%). In contrast, those with low pAkt had a DFS of almost 60%. The basal-like tumors (ER/PR- with HER2-) showed poor but similar DFS rates between low and high pAkt levels. Hence, the difference was not statistically significant. Finally, we compared differences in DFS between the different tumor subtypes, but within the high or low pAkt group. Our data suggest that, in comparison with the luminal A subtype (ER/PR+/HER2-), the 5-year DFS rate was significantly lower in luminal B (ER/PR+/HER2+), ER/PR-/HER2+, and basal-like (ER/PR-/HER2-). However, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.05) with the basal-like group. These observations demonstrate that basal-like tumors have the worse DFS, despite low levels of tissue pAkt. Next, when we compared the DFS rates among the patients with different tumor subtypes with high pAkt, we observed that all four subtypes had a very poor DFS rate. However, the ER/PR-/HER2+ subtype had the worse outcome.

Conclusion

Our studies confirm that an increase in tissue pAkt expression in HER2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer patients leads to poor outcome with a significant decrease in 5-year DFS. We also show that an increase in pAkt in HER2/neu-negative patients leads to poor DFS. In addition to established prognostic markers such as nodal involvement, tumor size, ER/PR status, and HER2/neu status, pAkt is an independent and strong predictor for a decrease in DFS. Therefore, pAkt may prove to be an important therapeutic target. A unique feature of our study is that more than 70% of African-American and Latina women with HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors are likely to have an increase in their tissue pAkt levels. This feature, however, needs to be validated using a larger cohort of minority patients and be compared to Caucasian patients with similar socioeconomic status, access to care, and stage of disease at diagnosis. Several comparative studies between African-American and Caucasian groups have confirmed significant differences in survival rates between the two groups. African-Americans tend to have poorer outcome 64 65 66 . It will be an important opportunity to target pAkt for therapy in these high-risk populations. Overexpression of pAkt may be a powerful prognostic marker for DFS in breast cancer.

Additional studies are required to understand the role of pAkt in the development of drug resistance. In this study, we were not able to ascertain the role of pAkt in HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors resistant to trastuzumab. This is because the patients who had received trastuzumab prior to 2004 were very few. Further studies are needed to determine whether the level of pAkt contributes to resistance to trastuzumab in these minority women with HER2/neu-positive breast cancer. Biological or genetic differences resulting from mutations in the PI3K pathway could account for the activated Akt tumors, in addition to mutations or loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) in HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors. Any of these factors could contribute to a poor response to therapy. More studies with a larger sample size will improve our understanding of the role of pAkt and poor disease outcome in all patients with breast cancer.

Abbreviations

AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; ATCC = American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA); DFS = disease-free survival; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; ER = estrogen receptor; IHC = immunohistochemistry; OS = overall survival; PI3K = phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PR = progesterone receptor; RR = relative risk; SD = standard deviation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

YW and JVV were responsible for data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, and editing. HM, RC, IA, and SC provided the clinical support for patient recruitment and were involved in the study design. DS provided overall guidance, direction, and critical review of the study design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank our patients, clinical coordinators, and the nursing staff for their participation. This work received financial support from the following sources: NIH/NCI U56 CA101599-01 (JVV), CA15083-25S3 (JVV), NIH/NIDDK R25 DK067015-01 (JVV), Department of Defense (BCRP) BC043180 (JVV), and MBRS NIH SO6 GM0685-10-01 (YW).

 <p>Cancer statistics, 2007</p> Jemal A Siegel R Ward E Murray T Xu J Thun MJ CA Cancer J Clin 2007 57 43 66 17237035 <p>Minority Women's Health</p> http://www.womenshealth.gov <p>Prognostic value of plasma HER-2/neu in African American and Hispanic women with breast cancer</p> Wu Y Khan H Chillar R Vadgama JV Int J Oncol 1999 14 1021 1037 10339653 <p>TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer</p> Langerod A Zhao HH Borgan OO Nesland JJ Bukholm II Ikdahl TT Kaaresen RR Borresen-Dale AL Jeffrey SS Breast Cancer Res 2007 9 R30 1929092 17504517 10.1186/bcr1675 <p>Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer</p> Rakha EA El-Sayed ME Green AR Lee AH Robertson JF Ellis IO Cancer 2007 109 25 32 10.1002/cncr.22381 17146782 <p>Molecular subtypes of breast cancer in relation to paclitaxel response and outcomes in women with metastatic disease: results from CALGB 9342</p> Harris LN Broadwater G Lin NU Miron A Schnitt SJ Cowan D Lara J Bleiweiss I Berry D Ellis M Hayes DF Winer EP Dressler L Breast Cancer Res 2006 8 R66 1797029 17129383 10.1186/bcr1622 <p>Molecular classification of breast cancer: implications for selection of adjuvant chemotherapy</p> Andre F Pusztai L Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2006 3 621 632 10.1038/ncponc0636 17080180 <p>Long-term treatment with tamoxifen facilitates translocation of estrogen receptor alpha out of the nucleus and enhances its interaction with EGFR in MCF-7 breast cancer cells</p> Fan P Wang J Santen RJ Yue W Cancer Res 2007 67 1352 1360 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1020 17283173 <p>Molecular changes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: relationship between estrogen receptor, HER-2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase</p> Gutierrez MC Detre S Johnston S Mohsin SK Shou J Allred DC Schiff R Osborne CK Dowsett M J Clin Oncol 2005 23 2469 2476 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.172 15753463 <p>HER2/PI-3K/Akt activation leads to a multidrug resistance in human breast adenocarcinoma cells</p> Knuefermann C Lu Y Liu B Jin W Liang K Wu L Schmidt M Mills GB Mendelsohn J Fan Z Oncogene 2003 22 3205 3212 10.1038/sj.onc.1206394 12761490 <p>Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin)</p> Lu Y Zi X Zhao Y Mascarenhas D Pollak M J Natl Cancer Inst 2001 93 1852 1857 10.1093/jnci/93.24.1852 11752009 <p>Phosphorylated/activated HER2 as a marker of clinical resistance to single agent taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer</p> Modi S DiGiovanna MP Lu Z Moskowitz C Panageas KS Van Poznak C Hudis CA Norton L Tan L Stern DF Carter D Seidman AD Cancer Invest 2005 23 483 487 10.1080/07357900500201301 16203655 <p>ErbB2 status and the benefit from two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal early stage breast cancer</p> Stål O Borg A Fernö M Källström AC Malmström P Nordenskjöld B South Sweden Breast Cancer Group; Southeast Sweden Breast Cancer Group Ann Oncol 2000 11 1545 1550 10.1023/A:1008313310474 11205461 <p>Prognostic relevance of cerbB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy</p> Gregory RK Powles TJ Salter J Chang JC Ashley S Dowsett M Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000 59 171 175 10.1023/A:1006394317282 10817352 <p>c-erbB2 overexpression decreases the benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer without axillary lymph node metastases</p> Carlomagno C Perrone F Gallo C De Laurentiis M Lauria R Morabito A Pettinato G Panico L D'Antonio A Bianco AR De Placido S J Clin Oncol 1996 14 2702 2708 8874330 <p>Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer</p> Romond EH Perez EA Bryant J Suman VJ Geyer CE Jr Davidson NE Tan-Chiu E Martino S Paik S Kaufman PA Swain SM Pisansky TM Fehrenbacher L Kutteh LA Vogel VG Visscher DW Yothers G Jenkins RB Brown AM Dakhil SR Mamounas EP Lingle WL Klein PM Ingle JN Wolmark N N Engl J Med 2005 353 1673 1684 10.1056/NEJMoa052122 16236738 <p>2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial</p> Smith I Procter M Gelber RD Guillaume S Feyereislova A Dowsett M Goldhirsch A Untch M Mariani G Baselga J Kaufmann M Cameron D Bell R Bergh J Coleman R Wardley A Harbeck N Lopez RI Mallmann P Gelmon K Wilcken N Wist E Sánchez Rovira P Piccart-Gebhart MJ HERA study team Lancet 2007 369 29 36 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60028-2 17208639 <p>HER2 therapy: molecular mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance</p> Nahta R Esteva FJ Breast Cancer Res 2006 8 215 1797036 17096862 10.1186/bcr1612 <p>Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-over-expressing metastatic breast cancer</p> Vogel CL Cobleigh MA Tripathy D Gutheil JC Harris LN Fehrenbacher L Slamon DJ Murphy M Novotny WF Burchmore M Shak S Stewart SJ Press M J Clin Oncol 2002 20 719 726 10.1200/JCO.20.3.719 <p>Mechanisms of disease: understanding resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in human breast cancer</p> Nahta R Yu D Hung MC Hortobagyi GN Esteva FJ Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2006 3 269 280 10.1038/ncponc0509 16683005 <p>Differential sensitivities of trastuzumab (Herceptin)-resistant human breast cancer cells to phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI-3K) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors</p> Chan CT Metz MZ Kane SE Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005 91 187 201 10.1007/s10549-004-7715-1 15868447 <p>Development of Herceptin resistance in breast cancer cells</p> Kute T Lack CM Willingham M Bishwokama B Williams H Barrett K Mitchell T Vaughn JP Cytometry A 2004 57 86 93 10.1002/cyto.a.10095 14750129 <p>Inflammation and IGF-I activate the Akt pathway in breast cancer</p> Prueitt RL Boersma BJ Howe TM Goodman JE Thomas DD Ying L Pfiester CM Yfantis HG Cottrell JR Lee DH Remaley AT Hofseth LJ Wink DA Ambs S Int J Cancer 2007 120 796 805 10.1002/ijc.22336 17096325 <p>The antiapoptotic effect of fibroblast growth factor-2 is mediated through nuclear factor-kappaB activation induced via interaction between Akt and IkappaB kinase-beta in breast cancer cells</p> Vandermoere F El Yazidi-Belkoura I Adriaenssens E Lemoine J Hondermarck H Oncogene 2005 24 5482 5491 10.1038/sj.onc.1208713 15856005 <p>Elevated phosphorylation and activation of PDK-1/AKT pathway in human breast cancer</p> Lin HJ Hsieh FC Song H Lin J Br J Cancer 2005 93 1372 1381 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602862 16288304 <p>Regulation of the activity of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase by Akt in cancer and adenoviral protein E1A-mediated sensitization to apoptosis</p> Liao Y Hung MC Mol Cell Biol 2003 23 6836 6848 193925 12972603 10.1128/MCB.23.19.6836-6848.2003 <p>Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin mediated by protein kinase B</p> Cross DA Cohen P Andjelkkovich M Hemmings BA Nature 1995 378 785 789 10.1038/378785a0 8524413 <p>Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor</p> Brunet A Bonni A Zigmond MJ Lin MZ Juo P Hu LS Anderson MJ Arden KC Blenis J Greenberg ME Cell 1999 96 857 868 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80595-4 10102273 <p>Regulation of cell death protease caspase-9 by phosphorylation</p> Cardone MH Roy N Stennicke HR Salvesen GS Franke TF Stanbridge E Frisch S Reed JC Science 1998 282 1318 1321 10.1126/science.282.5392.1318 9812896 <p>Interleukin-3-induced phosphorylation of BAD through the protein kinase Akt</p> del Peso L González-García M Page C Herrera R Nuñez G Science 1997 278 687 689 10.1126/science.278.5338.687 9381178 <p>Akt1/PKBalpha kinase is frequently elevated in human cancers and its constitutive activation is required for oncogenic transformation in NIH3T3 cells</p> Sun M Wang G Paciga JE Feldman RI Yuan ZQ Ma XL Shelley SA Jove R Tsichlis PN Nicosia SV Cheng JQ Am J Pathol 2001 159 431 437 1850562 11485901 <p>Activation of Akt/PKB in breast cancer predicts a worse outcome among endocrine treated patients</p> Pérez-Tenorio G Stål O Southeast Sweden Breast Cancer Group Br J Cancer 2002 86 540 545 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600126 11870534 <p>Activation of PI3K/Akt signaling and hormone resistance in breast cancer</p> Tokunaga E Kimura Y Mashino K Oki E Kataoka A Ohno S Morita M Kakeji Y Baba H Maehara Y Breast Cancer 2006 13 137 144 10.2325/jbcs.13.137 16755107 <p>Akt is frequently activated in HER2/neu-positive breast cancers and associated with poor prognosis among hormone-treated patients</p> Tokunaga E Kimura Y Oki E Ueda N Futatsugi M Mashino K Yamamoto M Ikebe M Kakeji Y Baba H Maehara Y Int J Cancer 2006 118 284 289 10.1002/ijc.21358 16049961 <p>The association between Akt activation and resistance to hormone therapy in metastatic breast cancer</p> Tokunaga E Kataoka A Kimura Y Oki E Mashino K Nishida K Koga T Morita M Kakeji Y Baba H Ohno S Maehara Y Eur J Cancer 2006 42 629 635 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.025 16464571 <p>AKT activation predicts outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen</p> Kirkegaard T Witton CJ McGlynn LM Tovey SM Dunne B Lyon A Bartlett JM J Pathol 2005 207 139 146 10.1002/path.1829 16088978 <p>Akt kinases in breast cancer and the results of adjuvant therapy</p> Stål O Pérez-Tenorio G Akerberg L Olsson B Nordenskjöld B Skoog L Rutqvist LE Breast Cancer Res 2003 5 R37 R44 154147 12631397 10.1186/bcr569 <p>Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and overexpression: comparison of frequently used assay methods in a molecularly characterized cohort of breast cancer specimens</p> Press MF Slamon DJ Flom KJ Park J Zhou JY Bernstein L J Clin Oncol 2002 20 3095 3105 12118023 <p>Assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in paired colorectal cancer and normal colon tissue simples using computer aided immunohistochemical analysis</p> Messersmith W Oppenheimer D Peralba J Sebastiani V Amador M Jimeno A Embuscado E Hidalgo M Iacobuzio-Donahue C Cancer Biol Ther 2005 4 1381 1386 16319527 <p>The Akt pathway in human breast cancer: a tissue-array-based analysis</p> Bose S Chandran S Mirocha JM Bose N Mod Pathol 2006 19 238 245 10.1038/modpathol.3800525 16341149 <p>Akt activation correlates with adverse outcome in tongue cancer</p> Massarelli E Liu DD Lee JJ El-Naggar AK Muzio LL Staibano S Placido SD Myers JN Papadimitrakopoulou VA Cancer 2005 104 2430 2436 10.1002/cncr.21476 16245318 <p>Molecular alterations in tumors and response to combination chemotherapy with gefitinib for advanced colorectal cancer</p> Ogino S Meyerhardt JA Cantor M Brahmandam M Clark JW Namgyal C Kawasaki T Kinsella K Michelini AL Enzinger PC Kulke MH Ryan DP Loda M Fuchs CS Clin Cancer Res 2005 11 6650 6656 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0738 16166444 <p>High expression of focal adhesion kinase (p125<sup>FAK</sup>) in node-negative breast cancer is related to overexpression of HER-2/neu and activated Akt Kinase but does not predict outcome</p> Schmitz KJ Grabellus F Callies R Otterbach F Wohlschlaeger J Levkau B Kimmig R Schmid KW Baba HA Breast Cancer Res 7 R194 R203 1064131 15743500 10.1186/bcr977 <p>Race, Breast Cancer Subtypes, and Survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study</p> Carey LA Perou CM Livasy CA Dressler LG Cowan D Conway K Karaca G Troester MA Tse CK Edmiston S Deming SL Geradts J Cheang MC Nielsen TO Moorman PG Earp HS Millikan RC JAMA 2006 295 2492 2502 10.1001/jama.295.21.2492 16757721 <p>Protein kinase B(c-Akt): a multifunctional mediator of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation</p> Coffer PJ Jin J Woodgett JR Biochem J 1998 335 1 13 1219745 9742206 <p>Molecular cloning expression and characterization of human serine/threonine kinase Akt-3</p> Masure S Haefiner B Wesselink JJ Hoefnagel E Mortier E Verhasselt P Tuytelaars A Gordon R Richardson A Eur J Biochem 1999 265 353 360 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00774.x 10491192 <p>Identification of a human Akt3 (protein kinase B γ) which contains the regulatory serine phosphorylation site</p> Nakatani K Sakaue H Thompson DA Weigel RJ Roth RA Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999 257 906 910 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0559 10208883 <p>Akt1 ablation inhibits, whereas Akt2 ablation accelerates, the development of mammary adenocarcinomas in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-ErbB2/neu and MMTV-polyoma middle T transgenic mice</p> Maroulakou IG Oemler W Naber SP Tsichlis PN Cancer Res 2007 67 167 177 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3782 17210696 <p>Akt1/PKBalpha kinase is frequently elevated in human cancers and its constitutive activation is required for oncogenic transformation in NIH3T3 cells</p> Sun M Wang G Paciga JE Feldman RI Yuan ZQ Ma XL Shelley SA Jove R Tsichlis PN Nicosia SV Cheng JQ Am J Pathol 2001 159 431 437 1850562 11485901 <p>Akt2 is frequently upregulated in HER-2/neu-positive breast cancers and may contribute to tumor aggressiveness by enhancing cell survival</p> Bacus SS Altomare DA Lyass L Chin DM Farrell MP Gurova K Gudkov A Testa JR Oncogene 2002 21 3532 3540 10.1038/sj.onc.1205438 12032855 <p>Akt2: a role in breast cancer metastasis</p> Chau NM Ashcroft M Breast Cancer Res 2004 6 55 57 314453 14680486 10.1186/bcr739 <p>Up-regulation of Akt3 in estrogen receptor-deficient breast cancers and androgen-independent prostate cancer lines</p> Nakatani K Thompson DA Barthel A Sakaue H Liu W Weigel RJ Roth RA J Biol Chem 1999 274 21528 21532 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21528 10419456 <p>The protein kinase B/Akt signalling pathway in human malignancy</p> Nicholson KM Anderson NG Cell Signal 2002 14 381 395 10.1016/S0898-6568(01)00271-6 11882383 <p>Twist transcriptionally up-regulates AKT2 in breast cancer cells leading to increased migration, invasion, and resistance to paclitaxel</p> Cheng GZ Chan J Wang Q Zhang W Sun CD Wang LH Cancer Res 2007 67 1979 1987 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1479 17332325 <p>eEF1A2 activates Akt and stimulates Akt-dependent actin remodeling, invasion and migration</p> Amiri A Noei F Jeganathan S Kulkarni G Pinke DE Lee JM Oncogene 2007 26 3027 3040 10.1038/sj.onc.1210101 17130842 <p>Adenoviral-mediated expression of a kinase-dead mutant of Akt induces apoptosis selectively in tumor cells and suppresses tumor growth in mice</p> Jetzt A Howe JA Horn MT Maxwell E Yin Z Johnson D Kumar CC Cancer Res 2003 63 6697 6706 14583464 <p>Roles of the PI-3K and MEK pathways in Ras-mediated chemoresistance in breast cancer cells</p> Jin W Wu L Liang K Liu B Lu Y Fan Z Br J Cancer 2003 89 185 191 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601048 12838322 <p>Phosphorylation of Akt (Ser473) predicts poor clinical outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer</p> Yu Z Weinberger PM Sasaki C Egleston BL Speier WF 4th Haffty B Kowalski D Camp R Rimm D Vairaktaris E Burtness B Psyrri A Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007 16 553 558 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0121 17372251 <p>Prognostic value of activated Akt expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma</p> Lim J Kim JH Paeng JY Kim MJ Hong SD Lee JI Hong SP J Clin Pathol 2005 58 1199 1205 <p>Evaluation of two phosphorylation sites improves the prognostic significance of Akt activation in non-small-cell lung cancer tumors</p> Tsurutani J Fukuoka J Tsurutani H Shih JH Hewitt SM Travis WD Jen J Dennis PA J Clin Oncol 2006 24 306 314 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4133 16330671 <p>Prognostic relevance of activated Akt kinase in node-negative breast cancer: a clinicopathological study of 99 cases</p> Schmitz KJ Otterbach F Callies R Levkau B Hölscher M Hoffmann O Grabellus F Kimmig R Schmid KW Baba HA Mod Pathol 2004 17 15 21 10.1038/modpathol.3800002 14631376 <p>Molecular portraits of human breast cancer tumors</p> Perou CM Sørlie T Eisen MB van de Rijn M Jeffrey SS Rees CA Pollack JR Ross DT Johnsen H Akslen LA Fluge O Pergamenschikov A Williams C Zhu SX Lønning PE Børresen-Dale AL Brown PO Botstein D Nature 2000 406 747 752 10.1038/35021093 10963602 <p>Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguished tumor subclasses with clinical implications</p> Sørlie T Perou CM Tibshirani R Aas T Geisler S Johnsen H Hastie T Eisen MB van de Rijn M Jeffrey SS Thorsen T Quist H Matese JC Brown PO Botstein D Eystein Lønning P Børresen-Dale AL Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 10869 10874 58566 11553815 10.1073/pnas.191367098 <p>Descriptive analysis of estrogen (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from California Cancer Registry</p> Baurer KR Brown M Cress RD Parsie CA Caggiano V Cancer 2007 109 1721 1728 10.1002/cncr.22618 17387718 <p>Within-stage racial differences in tumor size and number of positive lymph nodes in women with breast cancer</p> McBride R Hershman D Tsai W-Y Jacobson JS Grann V Neugut AI Cancer 2007 110 1201 1208 10.1002/cncr.22884 17701948 <p>Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African–American and Caucasian patients. A single-institution compilation compared with the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database</p> Morris GJ Naidu S Topham AK Guiles F Xu Y McCue P Schwartz GF Park PK Rosenberg AL Brill K Mitchell EP Cancer 2007 110 876 884 10.1002/cncr.22836 17620276