<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>bcr751</ui>
	<ji>BCJ</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research article</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Relationship of cell proliferation (Ki-67) to <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA uptake in breast cancer</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes">
					<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
					<mi>J</mi>
					<fnm>Vassilios</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>vpap@spark.net.gr</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A2">
					<snm>Souvatzoglou</snm>
					<mi>A</mi>
					<fnm>Michael</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A3">
					<snm>Valotassiou</snm>
					<mi>J</mi>
					<fnm>Varvara</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A4">
					<snm>Louvrou</snm>
					<mi>N</mi>
					<fnm>Androniki</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A5">
					<snm>Ambela</snm>
					<fnm>Constantina</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A6">
					<snm>Koutsikos</snm>
					<fnm>John</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A7">
					<snm>Lazaris</snm>
					<fnm>Dimitrios</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A8">
					<snm>Christodoulidou</snm>
					<mi>K</mi>
					<fnm>Julie</fnm>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A9">
					<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
					<mi>G</mi>
					<fnm>Maria</fnm>
					<insr iid="I4"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A10">
					<snm>Melissinou</snm>
					<mi>J</mi>
					<fnm>Maria</fnm>
					<insr iid="I5"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A11">
					<snm>Perperoglou</snm>
					<fnm>Aris</fnm>
					<insr iid="I6"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A12">
					<snm>Tsiouris</snm>
					<fnm>Spyridon</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A13">
					<snm>Zerva</snm>
					<mi>J</mi>
					<fnm>Cherry</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Department of Nuclear Medicine, 'Alexandra' University Hospital, Athens, Greece</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I2">
					<p>Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology, 'Alexandra' University Hospital, Athens, Greece</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I3">
					<p>Department of Radiology, 'Alexandra' University Hospital, Athens, Greece</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I4">
					<p>Department of Pathology, 'Alexandra' University Hospital, Athens, Greece</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I5">
					<p>Department of Internal Medicine, 'Metropolitan' Hospital, Athens, Greece</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I6">
					<p>Department of Research &amp; Statistics, 'Iaso' Hospital, Athens, Greece</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Breast Cancer Res</source>
			<issn>1465-5411</issn>
			<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
			<volume>6</volume>
			<issue>2</issue>
			<fpage>R56</fpage>
			<lpage>R62</lpage>
			<url>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/2/R56</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubid idtype="pmpid">14979918</pubid>
			</xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>9</day>
					<month>9</month>
					<year>2003</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<revreq>
				<date>
					<day>14</day>
					<month>10</month>
					<year>2003</year>
				</date>
			</revreq>
			<revrec>
				<date>
					<day>6</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2003</year>
				</date>
			</revrec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>19</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2003</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>11</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2003</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2004</year>
			<collab>Papantoniou et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.</collab>
		</cpyrt>
		<kwdg>
			<kwd>breast cancer</kwd>
			<kwd>Ki-67</kwd>
			<kwd><sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI</kwd>
			<kwd><sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA</kwd>
			<kwd>scintimammography</kwd>
		</kwdg>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Introduction</p>
					</st>
					<p>The aim of the present study was to identify the relationships between the uptake of radiotracers &#8211; namely pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] and sestamibi (MIBI) &#8211; and the following parameters in primary breast cancer: steroid receptor concentrations (i.e. estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]), Ki-67 expression, tumor size, tumor grade, age, and levels of expression of <it>p53 </it>and <it>c-erbB-2</it>. In addition, by multivariate regression analysis, we further isolated those factors with independent associations with (V)DMSA and/or MIBI uptake in primary breast cancer.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Methods</p>
					</st>
					<p>Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed breast carcinoma underwent preoperative scintimammography with technetium-99m (<sup>99m</sup>Tc)-(V)DMSA and/or <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI in consecutive sessions 10 and 60 min after administration of 925&#8211;1110 MBq of each radiotracer. The tumor-to-background ratio was calculated and correlated with the presence of ER, PR, Ki-67, tumor size, tumor grade, <it>p53</it>, and <it>c-erbB-2</it>. ER, PR, <it>p53</it>, and <it>c-erbB-2 </it>were determined immunohistochemically. The analysis included tumor-to-background ratio of (V)DMSA and MIBI uptake as dependent and all of the other parameters as independent variables.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st>
					<p>Correlation was positive between Ki-67 and (V)DMSA (<it>r </it>= 0.37 at 10 min, <it>P </it>= 0.038; <it>r </it>= 0.42 at 60 min, <it>P </it>= 0.018) and inverse between PR and (V)DMSA uptake (<it>r </it>= -0.46 at 10 min, <it>P </it>= 0.010; <it>r </it>= -0.51 at 60 min, <it>P </it>= 0.003). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between Ki-67 and (V)DMSA at 60 min (<it>P </it>= 0.045). Ki-67 was not significantly correlated with MIBI uptake, whereas tumor size was positively correlated with MIBI uptake at 60 min both in univariate (<it>r </it>= 0.45, <it>P </it>= 0.027) and multivariate analysis (<it>P </it>= 0.024). Negative correlations were observed between (V)DMSA uptake and ER, as well as between ER/PR and MIBI uptake, but these were not significant.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusion</p>
					</st>
					<p>Ki-67 appears to represent the major independent factor affecting (V)DMSA uptake in breast cancer. Tumor size was the only independent parameter influencing MIBI uptake in breast cancer. (V)DMSA appears to have an advantage over MIBI in that it can be used to visualize tumors with intense proliferative activity, and thus it can identify those tumors that are more aggressive.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Introduction</p>
			</st>
			<p>Several factors have been reported to be able to predict the biological behavior and clinical outcome of breast cancer, including proliferation index, tumor suppressor gene <it>p53</it>, over-expression of oncoprotein <it>c-erbB-2</it>, tumor size, age, steroid receptors, and grade of malignancy. Of these, proliferation rate is the most important parameter in predicting tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. Many attempts have recently been made to define more accurately a specific agent with which to image the proliferative activity of breast lesions using [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography, [<sup>18</sup>F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography, and deoxyuridine, with ambiguous results <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] and hexakis-2-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (sestamibi [MIBI]) appear to have different mechanisms of accumulation in tumor, which have not yet been completely clarified. Technetium-99m (<sup>99m</sup>Tc)-MIBI has been widely used for the past 5 years and has contributed significantly to the diagnosis of breast cancer, especially in circumstances that hinder mammographic diagnosis, such as dense breasts, scars, and implants. <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI is concentrated in cancer cells by an energy requiring transport mechanism and transmembrane electronegative potential, in addition to nonspecific mechanisms, and it is stored within the mitochondria. <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA is a tumor seeking agent <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp> that is known for its ability to detect medullary thyroid carcinoma <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>, soft tissue tumors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>, lung cancer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>, metastatic disease <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>, and brain tumors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. Its mechanism of accumulation has been thought to be related to the structural similarity between (V)DMSA core and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>-3</sup>, which is avidly taken up by some cancer cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. In a poorly differentiated breast cancer model, Palmedo and coworkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> reported that uptake of (V)DMSA was more than twofold greater than that of MIBI. Horiuchi and colleagues <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp> reported that <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA uptake by tumors was related to glucose mediated acidosis.</p>
			<p>We have conducted many comparative studies with (V)DMSA and MIBI in an attempt to identify their characteristics in detecting primary breast cancer and lymph node involvement, in defining tumor grade, and in visualizing preinvasive lesions such as ductal carcinoma <it>in situ </it>(DCIS)/lobular carcinoma <it>in situ </it>and epithelial hyperplasia, as well as their relationship with prognostic factors <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. Apart from what was considered until now to be its main mechanism of concentration in breast cancer, (V)DMSA was found by simple <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp> and multivariate regression analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> to be related to proliferative activity in invasive and preinvasive breast lesions, which is directly related to tumor grade.</p>
			<p>The aim of the present study was to determine the possible independent correlation between proliferative activity and other important prognostic factors, and (V)DMSA and MIBI uptake in breast cancer.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Materials and method</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Patients</p>
				</st>
				<p>The series consisted of 34 patients (age 61.6 &#177; 12.49 years [mean &#177; standard deviation], range 38&#8211;85 years) with histologically proven breast cancer (infiltrating ductal 13, infiltrating lobular 9, tubular 1, mixed ductal and lobular 3, and infiltrating ductal plus <it>in situ </it>ductal 8). Twenty one of these patients underwent both <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI scintigraphy in a double phase study, with an interval of 48 hours between the two tests. Ten patients underwent only <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA scintigraphy and three patients underwent only <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI scintigraphy. Thus, a total of 31 patients underwent <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA and 24 underwent <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI scintigraphy. Lateral prone and anterior supine images were acquired at approximately 15 and 60 min after administration of 925&#8211;1110 MBq of each radiotracer. Acquisitions were obtained using a special positioning pad (PBI-2 Scintimammography Pad Set<sup>&#174;</sup>; Pinestar Technology Inc., Greenville, PA, and Somerset, NJ, USA).</p>
				<p>Inclusion criteria for entry into the study were as follows: female sex, age greater than 21 years, not pregnant, suspicious lesion of the breast detected by palpation or mammography, recommendation for excisional biopsy after mammography, and informed consent. Exclusion criteria were recurrent disease, previous mastectomy, medically unstable patient with severe arrhythmia, heart failure or recent surgery, fine needle aspiration within 1 week before scintimammography, core biopsy during the previous 4 weeks, and previous chemotherapy.</p>
				<p>Scintimammography was performed using a single-head &#947; camera (Sophycamera DS7; Sopha Medical Vision International, Buc Cedex, France) equipped with a high-resolution parallel hole collimator connected to a dedicated computer (Sophy NxT; Sopha Medical Vision International). The matrix was 256 &#215; 256 pixels and the photo-peak was focused at 140 KeV with a symmetric 10% window. Scintimammography findings were characterized by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians as positive, suspicious, or negative. Disagreement was resolved by consensus or by obtaining a third opinion. The presence of focal increased activity, as compared with surrounding tissue, was classified as a positive study.</p>
				<p><sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA was prepared using a commercially available kit (DMS(V)/Demoscan<sup>&#174;</sup>; distributed by the National Center of Physical Sciences, Institute of Radioisotopes and Radiodiagnostics 'Democritos', Athens, Greece), containing 1.36 mg dimercaptosuccinic acid, 0.105 mg SnCl<sub>2</sub><sup>-2 </sup>H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.175 mg ascorbic acid, 12.5 mg inositole, 10 mg dextrose, 16.52 mg and 200 &#956;l 7% NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, which was reconstituted with 2&#8211;3 ml <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pertechnetate solution (approximately 925&#8211;1110 MBq). Sestamibi kit (Cardiolite<sup>&#174;</sup>), obtained from Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH (Regensburg, Germany), was labeled with <sup>99m</sup>Tc within the Department of Nuclear Medicine.</p>
				<p>Diagnosis was made by histopathology of the specimens obtained surgically. Scintigraphic results and mammograms were compared with histologic findings.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Image analysis</p>
				</st>
				<p>Accumulation of radiopharmaceutical in breast tumors was evaluated in early and delayed images visually and by calculating tumor-to-background ratio using regions of interest of standardized shape and size over the site of the greatest activity and the surrounding normal breast tissue. The same procedure was also performed with regions of maximum and minimum activity in the contralateral normal breast.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Immunostaining</p>
				</st>
				<p>An immunohistochemical method (avidin&#8211;biotin&#8211;peroxidase complex; ABC-HRP) was performed on paraffin embedded sections from breast cancer patients for demonstration of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), <it>p53</it>, <it>c-erbB-2</it>, and Ki-67 protein expression. For ER and PR receptor proteins the 1D5 and 1A6 monoclonal antibodies (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) were used at dilutions of 1 : 400 and 1 : 150, respectively. For <it>p53 </it>protein determination the specimens were incubated with 1 : 15 diluted monoclonal antibody (Clone BPS3.12.1; Oncogene Science, Cambridge, MA, USA). CB11 monoclonal antibody (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA, USA) was used for <it>c-erbB-2 </it>detection at a dilution of 1 : 150. A polyclonal antibody for Ki-67 (DAKO) was used at a dilution of 1 : 350. To enhance antigen retrieval, sections for ER, PR, and Ki-67 were microwave treated in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 750 W for 10 min.</p>
				<p>A semiquantitative estimation based on the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells was performed. Staining for ER and PR was evaluated using the H score system, and a score greater than 50 was considered positive for both antigens (0 = negative [0&#8211;50], 1 = mild reactivity [51&#8211;100], 2 = moderate reactivity [101&#8211;200], 3 = strong reactivity [201&#8211;300]). Staining for <it>p53</it>, <it>c-erbB-2</it>, and Ki-67 was scored on a scale from 0 to 3 in half steps (0 = negative [0&#8211;10% positive cells], 1 = 11&#8211;30% positive cells, 2 = 31&#8211;50% positive cells, 3 = &gt; 51% positive cells).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Data analysis</p>
				</st>
				<p>Patients were classified into four subgroups: groups 1 and 2 for early and late (V)DMSA acquisitions, respectively; and groups 3 and 4 for early and late MIBI acquisitions, respectively. To investigate which factors play important roles in the uptake of these radiotracers, we used both univariate and multivariate analysis. In univariate analysis we used the method of Spearman rank correlation to test whether there was a significant correlation between the uptake ratio (tumor-to-background ratio) and the variables of interest. Each analysis was performed within the four subgroups. In multivariate analysis, we used the method of stepwise multivariate linear regression for each subgroup. For all tests, <it>P </it>&lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<p>Tumor-to-background ratios for (V)DMSA and MIBI ranged from 1.13 to 2.80 (1.69 &#177; 0.49 [mean &#177; standard deviation]) and from 1.13 to 4.78 (1.96 &#177; 0.92), respectively. Descriptive statistics for all dependent parameters are listed in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. Information concerning tumor grade, tumor size, and age of patients is presented in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>.</p>
			<tbl id="T1">
				<title>
					<p>Table 1</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Values for parameters studied in the tumors</p>
				</caption>
				<tblbdy cols="5">
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Minimum</p>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>Maximum</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>Mean</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>Standard deviation</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c cspan="5">
							<hr/>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Age (years)</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>38</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>85</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>61.58</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>12.49</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Tumor Size (cm)</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>1</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>6</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>2.82</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>1.34</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Estrogen receptor</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>0</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>250</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>134</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>84.53</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Progesterone receptor</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>0</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>240</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>75.52</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>69.85</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>
								<it>p53</it>
							</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>0</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>100</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>10.42</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>13.95</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Ki-67</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>0</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>210</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>62.58</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>63.49</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>
								<it>c-erbB-2</it>
							</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>0</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>100</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>11.54</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>23.46</p>
						</c>
					</r>
				</tblbdy>
			</tbl>
			<tbl id="T2">
				<title>
					<p>Table 2</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Distribution of studied material according to grade and size of tumor and patient age</p>
				</caption>
				<tblbdy cols="3">
					<r>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>Frequency</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>Percentage</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c cspan="3">
							<hr/>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Grade</p>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>I</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>4</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>11.7%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>II</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>20</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>58.8%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>III</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>10</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>29.4%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Size</p>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>T<sub>1</sub></p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>5</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>14.7%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>T<sub>2</sub></p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>27</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>79.4%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>T<sub>3</sub></p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>2</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>5.8%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>Age (years)</p>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
						<c>
							<p/>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>&lt; 40</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>4</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>11.7%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>41&#8211;50</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>6</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>17.6%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>51&#8211;60</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>6</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>17.6%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c indent="1" ca="left">
							<p>61&#8211;70</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>12</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>35.2%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
					<r>
						<c ca="left">
							<p>&#8805; 71</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>6</p>
						</c>
						<c ca="center">
							<p>17.6%</p>
						</c>
					</r>
				</tblbdy>
			</tbl>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Proliferative index (Ki-67)</p>
				</st>
				<p>Linear regression univariate analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between Ki-67 and (V)DMSA uptake in early and late phases (<it>r </it>= 0.37 at 10 min, <it>P </it>= 0.038; <it>r </it>= 0.42 at 60 min, <it>P </it>= 0.018; Fig. <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Simple regression analysis could not identify any correlation of Ki-67 with MIBI uptake.</p>
				<fig id="F1">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Correlation of Ki-67 with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 min</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Correlation of Ki-67 with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 min. CI, confidence interval.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="bcr751-1"/>
				</fig>
				<p>Multivariate analysis demonstrated a positive correlation of Ki-67 with (V)DMSA (<it>P </it>= 0.045) but not with MIBI (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). If <it>c-erbB-2 </it>and <it>p53 </it>are excluded from the multivariate analysis, then the statistical significance of the correlation becomes greater (<it>P </it>= 0.023).</p>
				<tbl id="T3">
					<title>
						<p>Table 3</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Significant regression coefficients with standard errors and <it>P </it>values of the full model for <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI uptake</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="3">
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Standard error</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>P</it>
								</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="3">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>(V)DMSA at 60 min: Ki-67</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.002</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.045</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>MIBI at 60 min: tumor size</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.141</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.024</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>MIBI, sestamibi; <sup>99m</sup>Tc, technitium-99m; (V)DMSA, pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Estrogen and progesterone receptors</p>
				</st>
				<p>Using simple univariate analysis, inverse (negative) correlations between PRs and (V)DMSA uptake were found at 10 and 60 min (<it>r </it>= -0.46 at 10 min, <it>P </it>= 0.010; <it>r </it>= -0.51 at 60 min, <it>P </it>= 0.003; Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>, Figs <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). MIBI uptake was inversely but not significantly correlated with ER/PR receptors, despite its tendency to be related to lower ER/PR values.</p>
				<tbl id="T4">
					<title>
						<p>Table 4</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Correlation coefficients and their significance for the four groups</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="8">
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>ER</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>PR</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Ki-67</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Tumor size</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Age</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>p53</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>c-erbB-2</it>
								</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="8">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>(V)DMSA 10 min</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>r</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.24</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.46</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.37</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.32</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.30</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.06</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.09</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>P</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.187</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.010</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.038</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.081</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.093</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.745</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.640</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>(V)DMSA 60 min</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>r</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.26</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.51</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.42</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.25</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.22</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.23</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.09</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>P</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.157</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.003</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.018</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.178</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.226</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.206</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.617</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>MIBI 10 min</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>r</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.25</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.23</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.29</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.19</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.33</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.11</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>P</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.917</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.250</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.279</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.166</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.372</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.121</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.626</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>MIBI 60 min</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>r</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.27</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.35</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.45</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.27</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.22</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>-0.04</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>
									<it>P</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.953</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.211</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.097</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.027</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>0.202</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.305</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.848</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>ER, estrogen receptor; MIBI, sestamibi; PR, progesterone receptor; (V)DMSA, pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
				<fig id="F2">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Correlation of estrogen receptor (ER) with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 minutes</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Correlation of estrogen receptor (ER) with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 minutes. CI, confidence interval.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="bcr751-2"/>
				</fig>
				<fig id="F3">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 3</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Correlation of progesterone receptor (PR) with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 min</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Correlation of progesterone receptor (PR) with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 min. CI, confidence interval.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="bcr751-3"/>
				</fig>
				<p>Multivariate analysis did not reveal any significant correlation of uptake of either radiotracer with ER/PR receptor status.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Tumor size</p>
				</st>
				<p>Tumor size was positively correlated in univariate and multivariate analyses with MIBI uptake at 60 min (<it>r </it>= 0.45, <it>P </it>= 0.027 for univariate analysis; and <it>P </it>= 0.024 for multivariate analysis; Tables <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr> and <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>, Fig. <figr fid="F4">4</figr>). (V)DMSA was not found to be correlated with tumor size.</p>
				<fig id="F4">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 4</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Correlation of tumor size (TS) with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 min</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Correlation of tumor size (TS) with log transformed tumor-to-background ratios (T/B) of pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid [(V)DMSA] uptake at <b>(a) </b>10 min and <b>(b) </b>60 min, and sestamibi (MIBI) uptake at <b>(c) </b>10 min and <b>(d) </b>60 min. CI, confidence interval.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="bcr751-4"/>
				</fig>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Grade of malignancy, age, and expressions of <it>p53 </it>and <it>c-erbB-2</it></p>
				</st>
				<p>None of these parameters was significantly correlated with tumor (V)DMSA or MIBI uptake.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st>
			<p>The prognosis of breast cancer depends not only on the extent of the disease but also on the biological behavior of the tumor, which is based on physical, histologic, and immunohistochemical characteristics. Steroid receptor status, loss of differentiation, increasing proliferative activity, inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, over-expression of oncogenes, tumor size, and age are related to tumor progression and may be used to predict prognosis. Although the exact mechanism of tumor accumulation and the kinetics of the tracers MIBI and (V)DMSA have not yet been fully clarified, their possible correlation with some of these parameters should be of great importance in preoperative evaluation and prognostication in this disease.</p>
			<p>Scintimammography with <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA is a useful technique that is complementary to mammography in the assessment of suspected breast lesions. It has been reported to have high sensitivity (88.4%), specificity (93.3%), positive predictive value (95%), negative predictive value [82% for MIBI, 80% for (V)DMSA], and accuracy [90% for MIBI, 89% for (V)DMSA] for lesions greater than 1 cm in size; however, these values are less for lesions sized smaller than 1 cm, which might be considered a limitation of the procedure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Arrest of tumor cell proliferation is the ultimate objective of anticancer therapy. Breast cancer aggressiveness appears to be directly related to the percentage of Ki-67 positive cancer cells <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. The immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 appears to be associated with the grade of differentiation, angiogenic invasion, lymph node metastases, and the absence of ER and PR <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. In our group of patients there was a positive correlation in univariate analysis between <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA tumor uptake and Ki-67 expression in both early and late phases, which was more prominent in the late phase. This relationship was found in multivariate regression analysis to be independent of the presence of other prognostic factors, which indicates the existence of a separate primary pathway for the mechanism of accumulation of (V)DMSA in tumor tissue. This is considered to reflect its uptake in structures that participate in mitotic activity of cancerous and precancerous cell populations. The inverse correlation found between PR and (V)DMSA uptake strengthened our previous finding, because Ki-67 positivity is inversely correlated with the presence of PR receptors.</p>
			<p><sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI exhibited no correlation with Ki-67 in univariate and multivariate analyses. This indicates that this parameter could not represent an important regulating factor in MIBI accumulation in tumor tissue.</p>
			<p>Cwikla and coworkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>, in a group of 79 patients with breast cancer, also found a negative correlation of PR and a borderline negative correlation of ER with MIBI uptake. However, they did not find a significant correlation between Ki-67 expression and MIBI uptake (<it>P </it>= 0.09). Cutrone and coworkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp> reported a moderate positive correlation between MIBI uptake and cellular proliferation (<it>P </it>&lt; 0.05) in a group of 42 patients with breast cancer. Ohira and coworkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp> found that MIBI uptake did not reflect tumor growth rate in three animal models of breast cancer. However, it must be borne in mind that all of those investigators used only simple univariate analysis.</p>
			<p>For (V)DMSA, preliminary reports from our center <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp> indicate that preinvasive breast lesions such as DCIS/lobular carcinoma <it>in situ </it>and epithelial hyperplasia, and especially those with moderate to intense Ki-67 expression (unpublished data), can be identified with high sensitivity by (V)DMSA scintimammography. Mitotic activity and cellular proliferation are the hallmarks not only of invasive cancers but also of <it>in situ </it>or premalignant lesions such as atypical epithelial hyperplasia and tumors with unpredictable biologic behaviour such as phyllodes tumors. These lesions have been identified more frequently and more intensely with (V)DMSA than with MIBI <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Tumor size was positively correlated with MIBI uptake at 60 min (<it>r </it>= 0.45, <it>P </it>= 0.027), but not with (V)DMSA uptake, in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated independent correlation only with MIBI uptake at 60 min (<it>P </it>= 0.024). This finding indicates that MIBI concentration reflects more accurately the number of metabolically active cancer cells but does not represent tumor growth or cell proliferation. This independent correlation was found only at 60 min and shows that tumor vascularity was not involved in this process. The nondependency of (V)DMSA uptake with tumor size could be explained as a result of the heterogeneity of Ki-67 expression in different parts of the tumor. Cwikla and coworkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp> also found a positive correlation between MIBI uptake and size of the tumor in a group of 79 patients with breast cancer (<it>P </it>= 0.01).</p>
			<p>Tumor grading using Bloom&#8211;Richardson's criteria could in theory be considered another variable that is closely related to proliferative activity and to tumor uptake of the radiotracers (V)DMSA and MIBI. However, this was not demonstrated in univariate or multivariate analysis for either tracer.</p>
			<p>Cwikla and coworkers <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp> reported a positive correlation between MIBI uptake and malignant grade only for infiltrating ductal carcinomas (<it>P </it>= 0.03). Recently, in 45 breast cancer patients, we found that the difference in (V)DMSA and MIBI uptake between lower and higher tumor grades was not statistically different <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, by calculating the retention index ([delayed uptake &#8211; early uptake] &#215; 100/early uptake), we found that lower grade tumors had lower retention indices than did higher grade ones.</p>
			<p>In our group of patients the majority of cancers were of grade II or III. The lack of grade I cancers and the possible individual subjective over- or underestimation of close consecutive grades (II and III) could offer an alternative explanation for these observations.</p>
			<p>The relationship between <it>p53 </it>expression and other prognostic parameters is not yet clear. Contradictory findings concerning tumor size and lymph node status have been reported, but a strong relationship has been reported with <it>in situ </it>carcinomas and their histologic types. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that <it>p53 </it>overexpression reflects tumor aggressiveness and decreased disease free interval following therapy. Our findings indicated no <it>p53 </it>dependency of (V)DMSA or MIBI uptake in breast tumor in simple and multivariate analyses.</p>
			<p><it>C-erbB-2 </it>over-expression has also been suggested to be a prognostic factor in breast cancer. <it>C-erbB-2 </it>is found in almost 60% of cases of high grade comedo-type DCIS <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>, in 10&#8211;40% of infiltrating ductal carcinomas, and in only a few cases of infiltrating lobular carcinomas. <it>C-erbB-2 </it>expression has a close positive relationship with degree of differentiation and number of infiltrated lymph nodes, and an inverse correlation with the presence of hormonal receptors. In contrast, in our series no significant correlation was found in univariate and multivariate analyses between (V)DMSA or MIBI uptake and <it>c-erbB-2 </it>expression.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusion</p>
			</st>
			<p>In summary, the results of the present study suggest that proliferative activity is a major independent factor affecting (V)DMSA uptake in breast cancer. Tumor size was the only independent parameter influencing MIBI uptake in breast cancer. The negative correlation found between PR and (V)DMSA uptake can be interpreted as indirect and dependent on the negative correlation between Ki-67 and PR. The clinical significance of such an <it>in vivo </it>indicator of cell proliferation activity could be useful for predicting the prognosis and clinical behavior of an infiltrating breast cancer, and in the detection of early preinvasive lesions.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st>
			<p>None declared.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Abbreviations</p>
			</st>
			<p>DCIS = ductal carcinoma <it>in situ</it>; ER = estrogen receptor; MIBI = sestamibi; <sup>99m</sup>Tc = technetium-99m; (V)DMSA = pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid; PR = progesterone receptor.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p>Validation of FLT uptake as a measure of thymidine kinase-1 activity in A549 carcinoma cells</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rasey</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Grierson</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wiens</snm>
						<fnm>LW</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kolb</snm>
						<fnm>PD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schwartz</snm>
						<fnm>JL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>43</volume>
				<fpage>1210</fpage>
				<lpage>1217</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12215561</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>Rationale of 5-<sup>125</sup>I-iodo-4'-thio-2'-deoxyuridine as a potential iodinated proliferation marker</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Toyohara</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hayashi</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sato</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tanaka</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Haraguchi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshimura</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yonekura</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fujubayashi</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>43</volume>
				<fpage>1218</fpage>
				<lpage>1226</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12215562</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>FDG uptake in breast cancer: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Buck</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schirrmeister</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>K&#252;hn</snm>
						<fnm>Th</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shen</snm>
						<fnm>Ch</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kalker</snm>
						<fnm>Th</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kotzerke</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dankerl</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Glatting</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reske</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mattfeldt</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>29</volume>
				<fpage>1317</fpage>
				<lpage>1323</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00259-002-0880-8</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>A convenient method for the preparation of <sup>99m</sup>Tc(V) dimercaptosuccinic acid (<sup>99m</sup>Tc(V)-DMSA)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Westera</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gadze</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Horst</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Int J Appl Radiat Isot</source>
				<pubdate>1985</pubdate>
				<volume>36</volume>
				<fpage>311</fpage>
				<lpage>312</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0020-708X(85)90091-2</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">2991143</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>The chemical identity of pentavalent <sup>99m</sup>Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Blower</snm>
						<fnm>PJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Singh</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Clarke</snm>
						<fnm>SEM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1991</pubdate>
				<volume>32</volume>
				<fpage>845</fpage>
				<lpage>849</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">1850782</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>A new imaging agent for medullary carcinoma of the thyroid</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohta</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yamamoto</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Endo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mori</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hamanaka</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shimazu</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ikekubo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Makimoto</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Iida</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Konishi</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1984</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>323</fpage>
				<lpage>325</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">6321700</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Imaging of soft tissue tumors with <sup>99m</sup>Tc(V)-dimercaptosuccinic acid, a new tumor seeking agent</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohta</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Endo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fujita</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nakajima</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sakahara</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Torizuka</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shimizu</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hata</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Masuda</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Horiuchi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Clin Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1984</pubdate>
				<volume>9</volume>
				<fpage>564</fpage>
				<lpage>573</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>Clinical evaluation of tumor imaging using <sup>99m</sup>Tc(V)-dimercaptosuccinic acid, a new tumor seeking agent</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohta</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Endo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fujita</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Konishi</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Torizuka</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Horiuchi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yokoyama</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucl Med Commun</source>
				<pubdate>1988</pubdate>
				<volume>9</volume>
				<fpage>105</fpage>
				<lpage>116</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">2838772</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Primary lung cancer SPECT imaging with pentavalent <sup>99m</sup>Tc-DMSA</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hirano</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Otake</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshida</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Endo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>36</volume>
				<fpage>202</fpage>
				<lpage>207</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">7830114</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Technetium-99m-DMSA uptake by metastatic carcinoma of the prostate</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Lamki</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shearer</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1985</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>733</fpage>
				<lpage>734</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>Differentiating histologic malignancy of primary brain tumors: pentavalent Technetium-99m-DMSA</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hirano</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Otake</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shibasaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tamura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Endo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>38</volume>
				<fpage>20</fpage>
				<lpage>26</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8998143</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Technetium-99m-(V)-DMSA and Thallium-201 in brain tumor imaging: correlation with histology and malignant grade</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hirano</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Otake</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kazama</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wakabayashi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zama</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shibasaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tamura</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Endo</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>38</volume>
				<fpage>1741</fpage>
				<lpage>1749</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">9374344</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Tumor diagnosis using radioactive metal ions and their complexes</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Yokoyama</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Saji</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>In Metal Ions in Biological Systems</source>
				<publisher>New York: Marcel Dekker</publisher>
				<editor>Siegel H</editor>
				<pubdate>1980</pubdate>
				<volume>10</volume>
				<fpage>313</fpage>
				<lpage>340</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>Analogy between tumor uptake of technetium-99m-(V) dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and Technetium-99m-MDP</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wulfrank</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schelstraete</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Small</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charles</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Clin Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1989</pubdate>
				<volume>14</volume>
				<fpage>488</fpage>
				<lpage>593</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI in an animal breast cancer-model: comparison of tumor-uptake and correlation with scintigraphic and PET-detection [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Palmedo</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hensel</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bender</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wagner</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bangard</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bierrsack</snm>
						<fnm/>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>1130</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002590050017</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>Tc(V)-DMS tumor localization mechanism: a pH-sensitive Tc(V)-DMS-enhanced target/non-target ratio by glucose-mediated acidosis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Horiuchi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Saji</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yokoyama</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucl Med Biol</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>549</fpage>
				<lpage>555</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0969-8051(98)00012-2</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9751422</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>Technetium-99m (V) dimercaptosuccinic acid [Tc-99m (V) DMSA] in the detection of primary breast cancer. Preliminary results [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Karganzis</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsanelli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arka</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kostamis</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>1216</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>Comparison of Technetium-99m-[V]-DMSA with Technetium-99m-MDP in diagnosis of breast lesions [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsanelli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arka</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kostamis</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>1040</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>Similarity between <sup>99m</sup>Tc-V-DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc sestamibi in the detection of primary breast cancer. Preliminary results [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsanelli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Galeros</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feida</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kostamis</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>1040</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p><sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA scintimammography in the assessment of breast lesions. Comparative study with <sup>99m</sup>Tc MIBI</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsaneli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Christodoulidou</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Louvrou</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lazaris</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Papadaki</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Valotassiou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pampouras</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zerva</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>28</volume>
				<fpage>923</fpage>
				<lpage>928</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002590100545</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11504092</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>Uptake and washout of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-V-dimercaptosuccinic acid and <sup>99m</sup>-Tc-sestamibi in the assessment of histological type and grade in breast cancer</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Christodoulidou</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Papadaki</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Valotassiou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Souvatzoglou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Louvrou</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feida</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pampouras</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zerva</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucl Med Com</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>461</fpage>
				<lpage>467</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00006231-200205000-00006</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Immunohistologic assessment of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-(V)DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI uptake in breast cancer [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsaneli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arka</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Louvrou</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lazaris</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nakopoulou</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Palikarona</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>26</volume>
				<fpage>977</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>Correlation and multivariate regression analysis between <sup>99m</sup>Tc (V)DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc MIBI uptake and steroid receptors, proliferation index, tumor size, age, malignant grade, <it>p53</it>, and <it>c-erbB-2 </it>in primary breast cancer [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nakopoulou</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Christodoulidou</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Papadaki</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Souvatzoglou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsaneli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lazaris</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zerva</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>28</volume>
				<fpage>1120</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002590100545</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>Technetium-99m-MIBI scintimammography for suspicious breast lesions</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Palmedo</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schomburg</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Grunwald</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mallmann</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Krebs</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Biersack</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>37</volume>
				<fpage>626</fpage>
				<lpage>639</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8691253</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>A three-center study on the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI scintimammography</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Scopinaro</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schillaci</snm>
						<fnm>O</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ussof</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nordling</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Capoferro</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>De Vincentis</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Danieli</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ierardi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Picardi</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tavolaro</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Colella</snm>
						<fnm>AC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Anticancer Res</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>17</volume>
				<fpage>1631</fpage>
				<lpage>1634</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">9179208</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tavassoli</snm>
						<fnm>FN</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Pathology of the Breast</source>
				<publisher>Norwalk: Appleton &amp; Lange</publisher>
				<pubdate>1992</pubdate>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>Correlation between uptake of <sup>99m</sup>Tc Ses-taMIBI and prognostic factors of breast cancer</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cwikla</snm>
						<fnm>JB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Buscombe</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kolasinska</snm>
						<fnm>AD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rarbhaoo</snm>
						<fnm>SP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Thakrar</snm>
						<fnm>DS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hilson</snm>
						<fnm>AJW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Anticancer Res</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>19</volume>
				<fpage>2299</fpage>
				<lpage>2304</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">10472348</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Immunohistologic assessment of technetium-99m-MIBI uptake in benign and malignant breast lesions</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cutrone</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yospur</snm>
						<fnm>LS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Khalkhali</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tolmos</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Devito</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Diggles</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vargas</snm>
						<fnm>MP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shitabata</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>French</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>39</volume>
				<fpage>449</fpage>
				<lpage>453</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">9529290</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Comparison of intratumoral distribution of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI and deoxyglucose in mouse breast cancer models</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohira</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kubota</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohuchi</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Harada</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fukuda</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Satomi</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>41</volume>
				<fpage>1561</fpage>
				<lpage>1568</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">10994739</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>Scintimammographic findings of <it>in situ </it>ductal breast carcinoma in a double-phase study with <sup>99m</sup>Tc (V) DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc MIBI. Value of <sup>99m</sup>Tc (V) DMSA</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsaneli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Louvrou</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feda</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Christodoulidou</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pampouras</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zerva</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Clin Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>434</fpage>
				<lpage>439</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00003072-200006000-00009</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">10836691</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>Scintimammographic detection of ductal <it>in situ </it>carcinomas. Comparative study with <sup>99m</sup>Tc(V)DMSA and <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsanelli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Christodoulidou</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Papadaki</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Valotassiou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Louvrou</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bebi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pampouras</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keramopoulos</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>1129</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p><sup>99m</sup>Tc (V)DMSA breast uptake in usual type hyperplasia (HUT) and apocrine metaplasia (AM) in ralation with cell proliferation index (Ki-67) and the presence of estrogen receptors (ER). Comparative study with <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI [abstract]</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Papantoniou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sotiropoulou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stipsanelli</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Souvatzoglou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Valotassiou</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Koutsikos</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Louvrou</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ambela</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lazaris</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arka</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kounadi</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Melissinou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zerva</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Michalas</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Eur J Nucl Med</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>Suppl 2</volume>
				<fpage>S290</fpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B33">
				<title>
					<p>What's new in breast cancer: molecular perspectives of cancer development and the role of the oncogene <it>c-erbB-2 </it>in prognosis and disease</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Dawkins</snm>
						<fnm>HJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Robbins</snm>
						<fnm>PD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Smith</snm>
						<fnm>KL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sarna</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Harvey</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterrett</snm>
						<fnm>GF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Papadimitriou</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Pathol Res Pract</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>189</volume>
				<fpage>1233</fpage>
				<lpage>1252</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">7910395</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B34">
				<title>
					<p>The neu-protein and breast cancer</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>De Potter</snm>
						<fnm>CR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schellhom</snm>
						<fnm>AM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Virchows Archiv</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>426</volume>
				<fpage>107</fpage>
				<lpage>115</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">7757280</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
		</refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>
