<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>bcr826</ui>
   <ji>BCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Oral presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality: overview of the evidence so far</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Gabe</snm>
               <fnm>R</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Duffy</snm>
               <fnm>SW</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Cancer Research UK, London, UK</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Queen Mary University of London, UK</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Breast Cancer Res</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>Symposium Mammographicum 2004</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>Symposium Mammographicum 2004</p>
            </title>
            <location>Edinburgh, UK</location>
            <date-range>19th &#8211; 20th July 2004</date-range>
         </conference>
         <issn>1465-5411</issn>
         <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
         <volume>6</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 1</issue>
         <fpage>P7</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/bcr826</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>14</day>
               <month>7</month>
               <year>2004</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p/>
         </st>
         <p>Controversy remains over the scale of benefit women can expect from attending mammographic screening programs. We review the evidence, presenting (1) an updated meta-analysis of the latest results from the randomised trials and (2) an overview of the non-randomised evidence.</p>
         <p>After eight randomised trials with 12&#8211;20 years follow-up, the pooled results show a significant 20% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14%, 27%) reduction in breast cancer mortality associated with invitation to screening. When stratified by age, the reductions were 15% (95% CI: 2%, 27%) for women aged under 50 and 22% (95% CI: 14%, 30%) for women aged 50&#8211;74.</p>
         <p>The search strategy for nonrandomised evidence relating to mortality yielded 12 descriptive studies, seven case-series, six case&#8211;control, eight cohort and three nonrandomised comparative studies. All indicated some benefit associated with screening. Overall, the case&#8211;control studies indicated a 35% (95% CI: 20%, 48%) reduction in breast cancer mortality associated with screening. The corresponding reduction for cohort studies was 44% (95% CI: 39%, 48%) for screening and 31% (95% CI: 21%, 40%) for invitation.</p>
         <p>The majority of evidence from randomised and nonrandomised sources demonstrates a reduction in breast cancer mortality with screening. Studies should continue to monitor the benefit of screening programmes, taking care to address potential forms of bias.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
</art>
