<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Breast Cancer Research - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Breast Cancer Research</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/2/R17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/3/R149" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/9/1/R4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/8/2/R14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/2/R16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/103" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="${item.url}" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R12">
        <title>Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic features</title>
        <description>IntroductionMost breast cancers that occur in women with germline BRCA1 mutations are estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) and also typically lack expression of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 overexpression. We undertook a study to assess the clinical factors that predict for an estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and to characterize the pathologic features of these tumors.
Methods:
Clinical characteristics of BRCA1 carriers with 58 ER+ and 114 ER- first invasive breast cancers were compared. Pathologic features of BRCA1 ER+ cancers were compared to those of BRCA1 ER- cancers and to age-matched ER+ sporadic cancers.
Results:
BRCA1 carriers aged &#8805; 50 at diagnosis of first invasive breast cancer were more likely to have an ER+ cancer compared to those aged &lt; 50 (57% vs 29%, P = 0.005). ER+ BRCA1 cancers were less likely than ER- BRCA1 cancers to have &quot;BRCA-associated&quot; features such as high mitotic activity, geographic necrosis/fibrotic focus, and pushing margins (RR 0.06, 0.22, 0.24; P &lt; 0.001, 0.02, 0.03 respectively). When compared to sporadic ER+ cancers, ER+ BRCA1 cancers were more often of invasive ductal type (RR 2.4, P = 0.03), with a high mitotic rate (RR 5.0, P = 0.006) and absent or mild lymphocytic infiltrate (RR 10.2, P = 0.04).
Conclusions:
BRCA1 carriers who are older at first breast cancer diagnosis are more likely to have ER+ tumors than younger BRCA1 carriers. These ER+ cancers appear pathologically &quot;intermediate&quot; between ER- BRCA1 cancers and ER+ sporadic breast cancers raising the possibility that either some ER+ BRCA1 cancers are incidental or that there is a unique mechanism by which these cancers develop.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R12</link>
                <dc:creator>Nadine Tung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yihong Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Collins</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Kaplan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hailun Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Gelman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amy Comander</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bridget Gallagher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katharina Fetten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Krag</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathryn Stoeckert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Legare</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dennis Sgroi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paula Ryan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Judy Garber</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stuart Schnitt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:R12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr2478</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/2/R17">
        <title>Prediction of breast cancer sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
based on status of DNA damage repair proteins
</title>
        <description>IntroductionVarious agents used in breast cancer chemotherapy provoke DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSB repair competence determines the sensitivity of cells to these agents whereby aberrations in the repair machinery leads to apoptosis. Proteins required for this pathway can be detected as nuclear foci at sites of DNA damage when the pathway is intact. Here we investigate whether focus formation of repair proteins can predict chemosensitivity of breast cancer.
Methods:
Core needle biopsy specimens were obtained from sixty cases of primary breast cancer before and 18-24 hours after the first cycle of neoadjuvant epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) treatment. Nuclear focus formation of DNA damage repair proteins was immunohistochemically analyzed and compared with tumor  response to chemotherapy.
Results:
EC treatment induced nuclear foci of H2AX, conjugated ubiquitin, and Rad51 in a substantial amount of cases. In contrast, BRCA1 foci were observed before treatment in the majority of the cases and only decreased after EC in thirteen cases. The presence of BRCA1-, H2AX-, or Rad51-foci before treatment or the presence of Rad51-foci after treatment was inversely correlated with tumor response to chemotherapy. DNA damage response (DDR) competence was further evaluated by considering all four repair indicators together. A high DDR score significantly correlated with low tumor response to EC and EC + docetaxel whereas other clinicopathological factors analyzed did not.
Conclusions:
High performing DDR focus formation resulted in tumor resistance to DNA damage-inducing chemotherapy. Our results suggested an importance of evaluation of DDR competence to predict breast cancer chemosensitivity, and merits further studying into its usefulness in exclusion of non-responder patients.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/2/R17</link>
                <dc:creator>Hideki Asakawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hirotaka Koizumi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ayaka Koike</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Makiko Takahashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wenwen Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hirotaka Iwase</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mamoru Fukuda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomohiko Ohta</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:R17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr2486</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/3/R149">
        <title>Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome</title>
        <description>IntroductionInvasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises approximately 10% of breast cancers and appears to have a distinct biology. Because it is less common than infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), few data have been reported that address the biologic features of ILC in the context of their clinical outcome. In the present study we undertook an extensive comparison of ILC and IDC using a large database to provide a more complete and reliable assessment of their biologic phenotypes and clinical behaviors.
Methods:
The clinical and biological features of 4140 patients with ILC were compared with those of 45,169 patients with IDC (not otherwise specified). The median follow-up period was 87 months.
Results:
In comparison with IDC, ILC was significantly more likely to occur in older patients, to be larger in size, to be estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, to have lower S-phase fraction, to be diploid, and to be HER-2, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor negative. It was more common for ILC than for IDC to metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract and ovary. The incidence of contralateral breast cancer was higher for ILC patients than for IDC patients (20.9% versus 11.2%; P &lt; 0.0001). Breast preservation was modestly less frequent in ILC patients than in IDC patients. The 5-year disease-free survival was 85.7% for ILC and 83.5% for IDC (P = 0.13). The 5-year overall survival was 85.6% for ILC and 84.1% for IDC (P = 0.64).
Conclusion:
Despite the fact that the biologic phenotype of ILC is quite favorable, these patients do not have better clinical outcomes than do patients with IDC. At present, management decisions should be based on individual patient and tumor biologic characteristics, and not on lobular histology.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/3/R149</link>
                <dc:creator>Grazia Arpino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valerie Bardou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Clark</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Elledge</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2004, 6:R149</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-02-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>${item.identifier}</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R149</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-02-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R14">
        <title>Risk of breast cancer among daughters of mothers with diabetes: a population-based cohort study</title>
        <description>IntroductionDiabetes during pregnancy is related to enhanced fetal growth, which has been associated with increased breast cancer risk. Whether daughters of mothers with a diagnosis of diabetes have an increased risk of breast cancer is not known.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study of daughters of mothers with diabetes by linkage of the Swedish Multigeneration, Cause-of-Death and Patient Register between 1952 and 2005. Breast cancer cases were ascertained by linkage with the Swedish Cancer Register between 1958 and 2005. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of breast cancer were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution for the observed cases.
Results:
We identified 291,360 daughters of mothers with a diagnosis of diabetes before or after birth between 1952 and 2005. Among the daughters, 7956 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed between 1964 and 2005. The total time of follow-up was 12,173,821 person years. The expected number of breast cancer cases was 9204, resulting in an SIR of 0.86 (95 % CI, 0.85 to 0.88). The decrease in risk associated with maternal diabetes was stronger for premenopausal (&lt;55 years of age) than postmenopausal ([greater than or equal to]55 years of age) breast cancer (SIR 0.83 and 0.91, respectively). Among daughters of mothers&apos; with diabetes, a history of breast cancer in the mother increased the risk of breast cancer in the daughter (SIR 1.43, 1.32 to 1.54).
Conclusions:
Daughters of mothers with a lifetime history of diabetes were at a decreased risk of breast cancer. The strongest negative association was found among premenopausal breast cancer.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R14</link>
                <dc:creator>Olof Stephansson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fredrik Granath</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anders Ekbom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karin Michels</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:R14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr2481</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/9/1/R4">
        <title>Basal-like grade III invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: patterns of metastasis and long-term survival</title>
        <description>IntroductionCytokeratin (CK) 14, one of several markers expressed in normal myoepithelial/basal cells, is also expressed in a proportion of breast carcinomas. Previous studies have suggested that expression of such &apos;basal&apos; markers predicts different biological behaviour, with more frequent lung and brain metastases and poorer prognosis than other carcinomas.
Methods:
We performed CK14 immunohistochemistry on 443 grade III invasive ductal carcinomas with extended clinical follow-up (mean 116 months), and we correlated CK14 immunopositivity (basal-like phenotype) with clinicopathological criteria.
Results:
Eighty-eight of 443 (20%) tumours showed CK14 expression. CK14-positive tumours were more likely to be oestrogen receptor-negative (p &lt; 0.0001) and axillary node-negative (p = 0.001) than were CK14-negative cases. CK14-positive cases developed less bone and liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, p = 0.01, and HR 0.53, p = 0.035, respectively) but more frequent brain metastases (HR 1.92, p = 0.051). In patients without metastatic disease, disease-free survival in CK14-positive cases was significantly better than in CK14-negative cases (HR 0.65, p = 0.005). In patients with metastatic disease, however, CK14 positivity was associated with a poorer prognosis (HR 1.84, p = 0.001). The overall survival in CK14-positive and -negative patients was similar at 5 years (60% and 59%, respectively), but the long-term survival was better in CK14-positive patients (HR 0.69, p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
These results demonstrate that basal-like tumours differ in their biological behaviour from other tumours, with a distinct pattern of metastatic spread. Compared to other grade III tumours, basal-like tumours appear to have a relatively good long-term survival but survival after metastases is poor.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/9/1/R4</link>
                <dc:creator>Laura Fulford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jorge Reis-Filho</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kenneth Ryder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cheryl Gillett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Hanby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Douglas Easton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sunil Lakhani</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2007, 9:R4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-01-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr1636</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-01-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/8/2/R14">
        <title>Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer</title>
        <description>IntroductionIt has been shown in our previous work that breast asymmetry is related to several of the known risk factors for breast cancer, and that patients with diagnosed breast cancer have more breast volume asymmetry, as measured from mammograms, than age-matched healthy women.
Methods:
In the present study, we compared the breast asymmetry of women who were free of breast disease at time of mammography, but who had subsequently developed breast cancer, with that of age-matched healthy controls who had remained disease-free to time of the present study. The study group consisted of 252 asymptomatic women who had normal mammography, but went on to develop breast cancer. The control group were 252 age-matched healthy controls whose mammograms were also normal and who remained free of cancer during the study period. Breast volume was calculated from the cranio-caudal mammograms for each group, and the relationships between asymmetry, established risk factors and the presence or absence of breast cancer were explored.
Results:
The group who went on to develop breast cancer had higher breast asymmetry than controls (absolute asymmetry odds ratio 1.50 per 100 ml, confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 2.04; relative asymmetry 1.09, CI 1.01, 1.18), increased incidence of family history of breast cancer, lower age at menarche, later menopause, later first pregnancies and a higher frequency of high risk breast parenchyma types. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that breast asymmetry, height, family history of breast cancer, age at menarche, parenchyma type and menopausal status were significant independent predictors of breast cancer. When age at menopause was included in the model for the subgroup of post-menopausal women, absolute breast fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and relative breast FA remained significant effects.
Conclusion:
Breast asymmetry was greater in healthy women who later developed breast cancer than in women who did not.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/8/2/R14</link>
                <dc:creator>Diane Scutt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gillian Lancaster</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Manning</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2006, 8:R14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-03-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr1388</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-03-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R13">
        <title>Survival and self-renewing capacity of breast cancer initiating cells during fractionated radiation treatment</title>
        <description>IntroductionRecent data indicate a hierarchical organization of many solid cancers, including breast cancer, with a small number of cancer initiating cells (CICs) that have the ability to self-renew and exhibit multi-lineage potency. We, and others, have demonstrated that CICs in breast cancer and glioma are relatively resistant to ionizing radiation if compared to their non-tumorigenic counterparts. However, the extent of the remaining self-renewing capacity of CICs after fractions of radiation is currently unknown. We hypothesized that CICs, in contrast to their non-tumorigenic counterparts, not only survive fractions of ionizing radiation but also retain the CIC phenotype as defined by operational means.
Methods:
We used two marker systems to identify breast CICs (CD24-/low/CD44high, or lack of proteasome activity) and performed sphere-forming assays after multiple clinical fractions of radiation. Lineage tracking was performed by membrane staining. Cell cycle distribution and RNA content were assessed by flow cytometry and senescence was assessed via &#946;-galactosidase staining.
Results:
We demonstrated that irradiated CICs survived and retained their self-renewal capacity for at least four generations. We show that fractionated radiation not only spared CICs but also mobilized them from a quiescent/G0 phase of the cell cycle into actively cycling cells, while the surviving non-tumorigenic cells were driven into senescence.
Conclusions:
The breast CIC population retains increased self-renewal capacity over several generations and therefore, we conclude that increases in the number of CICs after sublethal doses of radiation have potential clinical importance. Prevention of this process may lead to improved clinical outcome.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/R13</link>
                <dc:creator>Chann Lagadec</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Erina Vlashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorenza Della Donna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>YongHong Meng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Dekmezian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kwanghee Kim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Pajonk</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:R13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr2479</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/2/R16">
        <title>Effects of lovastatin on breast cancer cells: a proteo-metabonomic study</title>
        <description>IntroductionStatins are cholesterol-lowering drugs with pleiotropic activities including inhibition of isoprenylation and reduction of signals driving cell proliferation and survival responses.
Methods:
In this study we evaluated the effects of lovastatin acid and lactone on breast cancer MDAMB231 and MDAMB468 cells using a combination of proteomic and metabonomic profiling techniques.
Results:
Lovastatin inhibited proliferation of breast cancer cell lines. MDAMB231 cells were more sensitive to its effects, and in most cases lovastatin acid showed more potency towards the manipulation of protein expression than lovastatin lactone. Increased expression of Rho inhibitor GDI-2 stabilized the non-active Ras homolog gene family member A (RhoA) leading to a decreased expression of its active, membrane-bound form. Its downstream targets cofilin, CDC42 and G3BP1 are members of the GTPase family affected by lovastatin. Our data indicated that lovastatin modulated the E2F1-pathway through the regulation of expression of prohibitin and retinoblastoma (Rb). This subsequently leads to changes of E2F-downstream targets minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7) and MutS homolog 2 (MSH2). Lovastatin also regulated the AKT-signaling pathway. Increased phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and decreased DJ-1 expression lead to a down-regulation of the active pAkt. Lovastatin&apos;s involvement in the AKT-signaling pathway was confirmed by an upregulation of its downstream target, tumor progressor NDRG1. Metabolic consequences to lovastatin exposure included suppression of glycolytic and Krebs cycle activity, and lipid biosynthesis.
Conclusions:
The combination of proteomics and metabonomics enabled us to identify several key targets essential to the antitumor activity of lovastatin. Our results imply that lovastatin has the potential to reduce the growth of breast cancer cells.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/2/R16</link>
                <dc:creator>Jelena Klawitter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Touraj Shokati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vanessa Moll</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Uwe Christians</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jost Klawitter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:R16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr2485</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/103">
        <title>Recent declines in breast cancer incidence: mounting evidence that reduced use of menopausal hormones is largely responsible</title>
        <description>Substantial reductions in breast cancer incidence in women 50 years old or older have been observed recently in many developed countries, and falling use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) remains the most plausible explanation. In keeping with recent observations from the Women&apos;s Health Initiative, a report from the California Teachers Study cohort in this issue of Breast Cancer Research adds to this growing evidence. The investigators found a 26% reduction in invasive breast cancer in the cohort from 2000-2002 to 2003-2005, which accompanied an estimated 64% drop in HT use between 2000-2001 and 2005-2006. By collating individual data on the use of HT and breast cancer incidence, they also demonstrated that the decline in incidence was concentrated in women who had ceased HT use. The decline reflected a decrease predominantly in oestrogen receptor-positive tumours in the context of stable screening patterns over the study period. Millions of women continue to use HT, and these findings support carefully targeted short duration use as an important ongoing strategy to minimise breast cancer risk.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/1/103</link>
                <dc:creator>Emily Banks</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Canfell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:103</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr2463</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="${item.url}">
        <title>Prescriptions for selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and risk of breast cancer in a population-based case-control study</title>
        <description>IntroductionNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prevent the growth of mammary tumours in animal models.  Two population-based case-control studies suggest a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with selective cyclooxygenase-2 (sCox-2) inhibitor use, but data regarding the association between breast cancer occurrence and use of non-selective NSAIDs are conflicting.
Methods:
We conducted a population-based case-control study using Danish healthcare databases to examine if use of NSAIDs, including sCox-2 inhibitors, was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer.  We included 8,195 incident breast cancer cases diagnosed 1991 through 2006 and 81,950 population controls.
Results:
Overall, we found no reduced breast cancer risk in ever users (&gt;2 prescriptions) of sCox-2 inhibitors [odds ratio (OR)=1.08, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.99, 1.18), aspirin (OR=0.98, 95%CI=0.90-1.07), or non-selective NSAIDs OR=1.04, (95%CI=0.98, 1.10)].  Recent use (&gt;2 prescriptions within 2 years of index date) of sCox-2 inhibitors, aspirin, or non-selective NSAIDs was likewise not associated with breast cancer risk [ORs=1.06 (95%CI=0.96, 1.18), 0.96 (95%CI=0.87, 1.06) and 0.99 (95%CI=0.85, 1.16), respectively].  Risk estimates by duration (&lt;10, 10-15, 15+ years) or intensity (low/medium/high) of NSAID use were also close to unity.  Regardless of intensity, shorter or long-term NSAID use was not significantly associated with breast cancer risk.
Conclusions:
Overall, we found no compelling evidence of a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with use of sCox-2 inhibitors, aspirin, or non-selective NSAIDs.</description>
        <link>${item.link}</link>
                <dc:creator>Deirdre Cronin-Fenton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars Pedersen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Timothy Lash</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Soren Friis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Baron</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henrik Toft Sorensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12:R15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>${item.identifier}</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
