<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Breast Cancer Research - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Breast Cancer Research</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R30" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R65" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/308" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R58" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R42" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/3/R149" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/8/4/212" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/3/R71" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R61" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R30">
        <title>Modulation of CXCR3 ligand secretion by prostaglandin E2 and cyclooxygenase inhibitors in human breast cancer</title>
        <description>IntroductionIn murine breast cancer models, the two interferon-gamma (IFN-&#947;) inducible chemokines and CXC-chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) receptor ligands, monokine induced by &#947;-interferon (CXCL9) and interferon-&#947;-inducible protein-10 (CXCL10) impair tumor growth and metastasis formation through recruitment of natural killer (NK) cells and tumor-suppressive T lymphocytes. In human breast cancer, CXCL9 mRNA overexpression correlates with the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and predicts response to different chemotherapeutic regimens. Raising the intratumoral CXCR3 ligand concentration is therefore a possible way to enhance immune intervention in breast cancer. Little is known, however, about expression levels and regulation of these chemokines in human breast cancer. Since the inhibition of cyclooxygenases (COX) has been shown to reduce tumor growth and incidence of metastases in a lymphocytic and IFN-&#947; dependent manner, we argued that COX isoenzymes are a pharmacologic target to increase intratumoral CXCR3 ligand concentration in human breast cancer.
Methods:
CXCL9 was visualized in breast cancer specimens by immunohistochemistry, expression levels of CXCL9 and cyclooxygenases were determined by ELISA and western blotting, respectively. For regulation studies, Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF-7) and M.D. Anderson - Metastatic Breast 231 (MDA-MB 231) breast cancer cells were stimulated with IFN-&#947; with or without prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) or COX inhibitors (indomethacin, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), celecoxib). CXCR3 ligand release from cells was measured by ELISA.
Results:
Within the tumor microenvironment, cancer cells are the major source of CXCL9. PGE2 impairs IFN-&#947; mediated CXCL9 and CXCL10 release from MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 cells, and inhibition of endogenous cyclooxygenases by indomethacin or ASA correspondingly increases this secretion. Otherwise, high concentrations of the Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) specific antagonist celecoxib have opposite effects and impair CXCL9 and CXCL10 release. In human breast cancer tissue specimens there is an inverse correlation between COX-2 overexpression and CXCL9 concentration, suggesting that the observed in vitro effects are of importance in vivo as well.
Conclusions:
Suppressing endogenous PGE2 synthesis by cyclooxygenase inhibition increases CXCL9 and CXCL10 release from breast cancer cells and is therefore a pharmacologic candidate to enhance intratumoral immune infiltration. Yet, to this end the unselective COX inhibitors ASA and indomethacin seem preferable to celecoxib that at higher concentrations reduces CXCR3 ligand release most probably due to COX independent mechanisms.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R30</link>
                <dc:creator>Holger Bronger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Kraeft</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrike Schwarz-Boeger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudia Cerny</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandra Stockel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefanie Avril</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marion Kiechle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manfred Schmitt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R30</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3115</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3115-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R30</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R65">
        <title>Deficiency of the p53/p63 target Perp alters mammary gland homeostasis and promotes cancer </title>
        <description>IntroductionPerp is a transcriptional target of both p53 during DNA damage-induced apoptosis and p63 during stratified epithelial development. Perp-/- mice exhibit postnatal lethality associated with dramatic blistering of the epidermis and oral mucosa, reflecting a critical role in desmosome-mediated intercellular adhesion in keratinocytes. However, the role of Perp in tissue homeostasis in other p63-dependent stratified epithelial tissues is poorly understood. Given that p63 is essential for proper mammary gland development and that cell adhesion is fundamental for ensuring the proper architecture and function of the mammary epithelium, here we investigate Perp function in the mammary gland.
Methods:
Immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis were performed to characterize Perp expression and localization in the mouse mammary epithelium throughout development. The consequences of Perp deficiency for mammary epithelial development and homeostasis were examined by using in vivo mammary transplant assays. Perp protein levels in a variety of human breast cancer cell lines were compared with those in untransformed cells with Western blot analysis. The role of Perp in mouse mammary tumorigenesis was investigated by aging cohorts of K14-Cre/+;p53fl/fl mice that were wild-type or deficient for Perp. Mammary tumor latency was analyzed, and tumor-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results:
We show that Perp protein is expressed in the mammary epithelium, where it colocalizes with desmosomes. Interestingly, although altering desmosomes through genetic inactivation of Perp does not dramatically impair mammary gland ductal development, Perp loss affects mammary epithelial homeostasis by causing the accumulation of inflammatory cells around mature mammary epithelium. Moreover, we show reduced Perp expression in many human breast cancer cell lines compared with untransformed cells. Importantly, Perp deficiency also promotes the development of mouse mammary cancer.
Conclusions:
Together, these observations demonstrate an important role for Perp in normal mammary tissue function and in mammary cancer suppression. In addition, our findings highlight the importance of desmosomes in cancer suppression and suggest the merit of evaluating Perp as a potential prognostic indicator or molecular target in breast cancer therapy.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R65</link>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Dusek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamie Bascom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hannes Vogel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvain Baron</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Borowsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mina Bissell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Attardi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R65</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3171</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Cellular &apos;glue&apos; resists breast cancer</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>The protein Perp, associated with desmosomes  - the glue that sticks cells together - is involved in suppressing breast cancer and provides a potential new target for future treatment.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3171-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R65</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/308">
        <title>Adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: winning efforts continue to improve HER2-positive patient outcome long-term</title>
        <description>Randomized adjuvant trials continue to show significant reductions in distant recurrence and death for early-stage women treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. BCIRG-006 showed superior disease-free and overall survival of two trastuzumab-containing regimens in comparison to a non-trastuzumab-containing regimen. The rates of disease-free and overall survival were not statistically different for the two trastuzumab-containing arms. Ongoing study is needed to identify markers of resistance to trastuzumab and incorporate newer agents in the adjuvant setting in order to further decrease rates of distant recurrence and death from HER2-positive breast cancer.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/308</link>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Jankowitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Brufsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:308</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3120</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3120-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>308</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R58">
        <title>Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African-American women: a case-control study</title>
        <description>IntroductionAmerican women of African ancestry (AA) are more likely than European Americans (EA) to have estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) is low in AAs, and was associated with ER-negative tumors in EAs. We hypothesized that racial differences in 25OHD levels, as well as in inherited genetic variations, may contribute, in part, to the differences in tumor characteristics.
Methods:
In a case (n = 928)-control (n = 843) study of breast cancer in AA and EA women, we measured serum 25OHD levels in controls and tested associations between risk and tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VDR, CYP24A1 and CYP27B1, particularly by ER status.
Results:
More AAs had severe vitamin D deficiency (&lt; 10 ng/ml) than EAs (34.3% vs 5.9%), with lowest levels among those with the highest African ancestry. Associations for SNPs differed by race. Among AAs, VDR SNP rs2239186, associated with higher serum levels of 25OHD, decreased risk after correction for multiple testing (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31-0.79, p by permutation = 0.03), but had no effect in EAs. The majority of associations were for ER-negative breast cancer, with seven differential associations between AA and EA women for CYP24A1 (p for interaction &lt; 0.10). SNP rs27622941 was associated with a &gt; twofold increased risk of ER-negative breast cancer among AAs (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.38-4.98), but had no effect in EAs. rs2209314 decreased risk among EAs (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.20-0.73), with no associations in AAs. The increased risk of ER-negative breast cancer in AAs compared to EAs was reduced and became non-significant (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.80-1.79) after adjusting for these two CYP24A1 SNPs.
Conclusions:
These data suggest that genetic variants in the vitamin D pathway may be related to the higher prevalence of ER-negative breast cancer in AA women.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R58</link>
                <dc:creator>Song Yao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Zirpoli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dana Bovbjerg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lina Jandorf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chi-Chen Hong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hua Zhao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lara Sucheston</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Li Tang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michelle Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Ciupak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Warren Davis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helena Hwang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Candace Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan McCann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Foluso Ademuyiwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Pawlish</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elisa Bandera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Ambrosone</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R58</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3162</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Vitamin D receptor and breast cancer</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Genetic variations in the vitamin D receptor and CYP24A1, an enzyme responsible for deactivating vitamin D, are associated with an increase in breast cancer risk for African American women.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3162-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R58</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R12">
        <title>MIBE acts as antagonist ligand of both estrogen receptor alpha and GPER in breast cancer cells</title>
        <description>IntroductionThe multiple biological responses to estrogens are mainly mediated by the classical estrogen receptors ER&#945; and ER&#946;, which act as ligand-activated transcription factors. ER&#945; exerts a main role in the development of breast cancer; therefore, the ER antagonist tamoxifen has been widely used although its effectiveness is limited by de novo and acquired resistance. Recently, GPR30/GPER, a member of the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor family, has been implicated in mediating the effects of estrogens in various normal and cancer cells. In particular, GPER triggered gene expression and proliferative responses induced by estrogens and even ER antagonists in hormone-sensitive tumor cells. Likewise, additional ER ligands showed the ability to bind to GPER eliciting promiscuous and, in some cases, opposite actions through the two receptors. We synthesized a novel compound (ethyl 3-[5-(2-ethoxycarbonyl-1-methylvinyloxy)-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl]but-2-enoate), referred to as MIBE, and investigated its properties elicited through ER&#945; and GPER in breast cancer cells.
Methods:
Molecular modeling, binding experiments and functional assays were performed in order to evaluate the biological action exerted by MIBE through ER&#945; and GPER in MCF7 and SkBr3 breast cancer cells.
Results:
MIBE displayed the ability to act as an antagonist ligand for ER&#945; and GPER as it elicited inhibitory effects on gene transcription and growth effects by binding to both receptors in breast cancer cells. Moreover, GPER was required for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ERK activation by EGF as ascertained by using MIBE and performing gene silencing experiments.
Conclusions:
Our findings provide novel insights on the functional cross-talk between GPER and EGFR signaling. Furthermore, the exclusive antagonistic activity exerted by MIBE on ER&#945; and GPER could represent an innovative pharmacological approach targeting breast carcinomas which express one or both receptors at the beginning and/or during tumor progression. Hence, the simultaneous inhibition of both ER&#945; and GPER may guarantee major therapeutic benefits in respect to the use of a selective estrogen receptor antagonist.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/1/R12</link>
                <dc:creator>Rosamaria Lappano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Francesca Santolla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marco Pupo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Stefania Sinicropi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Caruso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Camillo Rosano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcello Maggiolini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3096</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3096-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R42">
        <title>Breastfeeding and the Risk of Breast Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers</title>
        <description>IntroductionBreastfeeding has been inversely related to breast cancer risk in the general population. Clarifying the role of breastfeeding among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation may be helpful for risk assessment and for recommendations regarding prevention. We present an updated analysis of breastfeeding and risk of breast cancer using a large matched sample of BRCA mutation carriers.
Methods:
We conducted a case-control study of 1,665 pairs of women with a deleterious mutation in either BRCA1 (n = 1,243 pairs) or BRCA2 (n = 422 pairs). Breast cancer cases and unaffected controls were matched on year of birth, mutation status, country of residence and parity. Information about reproductive factors, including breastfeeding for each live birth, was collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the association between ever having breastfed, as well as total duration of breastfeeding, and the risk of breast cancer.
Results:
Among BRCA1 mutation carriers, breastfeeding for at least one year was associated with a 32% reduction in risk (OR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91; P = 0.008); breastfeeding for two or more years conferred a greater reduction in risk (OR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.74). Among BRCA2 mutation carriers, there was no significant association between breastfeeding for at least one year and breast cancer risk (OR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.31; P = 0.43).
Conclusions:
These data extend our previous findings that breastfeeding protects against BRCA1-, but not BRCA2-associated breast cancer. BRCA mutation carriers should be advised of the benefit of breastfeeding in terms of reducing breast cancer risk.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R42</link>
                <dc:creator>Joanne Kotsopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Lubisnki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leonardo Salmena</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henry Lynch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charmaine Kim-Sing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Foulkes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Parviz Ghadirian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Neuhausen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rochelle Demsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nadine Tung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Ainsworth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leigha Senter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Eisen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charis Eng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Singer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ophira Ginsburg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joanne Blum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Huzarski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aletta Poll</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ping Sun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Narod</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (hbcc)</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R42</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3138</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Breastfeeding and breast cancer</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Breastfeeding is protective against BRCA1- but not BRCA2-associated breast cancer, suggesting they have different biological pathways for carcinogenesis, and mutation carriers should be advised of the potential benefit of breastfeeding.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3138-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R42</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/3/R149">
        <title>Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome</title>
        <description>IntroductionInvasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises approximately 10% of breast cancers and appears to have a distinct biology. Because it is less common than infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), few data have been reported that address the biologic features of ILC in the context of their clinical outcome. In the present study we undertook an extensive comparison of ILC and IDC using a large database to provide a more complete and reliable assessment of their biologic phenotypes and clinical behaviors.
Methods:
The clinical and biological features of 4140 patients with ILC were compared with those of 45,169 patients with IDC (not otherwise specified). The median follow-up period was 87 months.
Results:
In comparison with IDC, ILC was significantly more likely to occur in older patients, to be larger in size, to be estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, to have lower S-phase fraction, to be diploid, and to be HER-2, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor negative. It was more common for ILC than for IDC to metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract and ovary. The incidence of contralateral breast cancer was higher for ILC patients than for IDC patients (20.9% versus 11.2%; P &lt; 0.0001). Breast preservation was modestly less frequent in ILC patients than in IDC patients. The 5-year disease-free survival was 85.7% for ILC and 83.5% for IDC (P = 0.13). The 5-year overall survival was 85.6% for ILC and 84.1% for IDC (P = 0.64).
Conclusion:
Despite the fact that the biologic phenotype of ILC is quite favorable, these patients do not have better clinical outcomes than do patients with IDC. At present, management decisions should be based on individual patient and tumor biologic characteristics, and not on lobular histology.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/6/3/R149</link>
                <dc:creator>Grazia Arpino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valerie Bardou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Clark</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Elledge</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2004, null:R149</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-02-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>${item.identifier}</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr767-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R149</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-02-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/8/4/212">
        <title>Mouse models of breast cancer metastasis</title>
        <description>Metastatic spread of cancer cells is the main cause of death of breast cancer patients, and elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying this process is a major focus in cancer research. The identification of appropriate therapeutic targets and proof-of-concept experimentation involves an increasing number of experimental mouse models, including spontaneous and chemically induced carcinogenesis, tumor transplantation, and transgenic and/or knockout mice. Here we give a progress report on how mouse models have contributed to our understanding of the molecular processes underlying breast cancer metastasis and on how such experimentation can open new avenues to the development of innovative cancer therapy.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/8/4/212</link>
                <dc:creator>Anna Fantozzi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerhard Christofori</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2006, null:212</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-07-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr1530</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr1530-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-07-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/3/R71">
        <title>Biomarkers Characterization of Circulating Tumour Cells in Breast Cancer Patients</title>
        <description>IntroductionIncreasing evidence supports that the detection of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) predicts outcomes of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients. CTCs differ genetically from the primary tumour and may contribute to variations in prognosis and response to therapy. As we start to understand more about the biology of CTCs, we can begin to address how best to treat this form of disease.
Methods:
98 nonmetastatic breast cancer patients were included in this study.  CTCs were isolated by immunomagnetic techniques using magnetic beads labelled with a multi-CK-specific antibody (CK3-11D5) and CTCs detection through immunocytochemical methods. Estrogen receptor, Progesterone receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were evaluated by immunofluorescence experiments and HER2 and TOP2A by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization. We aimed to characterize this set of biomarkers in CTCs and correlate with clinical-pathological characteristics.
Results:
Baseline detection rate was 46.9% [greater than or equal to]1 CTC/30 ml threshold. CTCs-positive were more frequent in HER2-negative tumours (p=0.046). In patients younger than 50 years old, HER2 amplified and G1-G2 tumours had a higher possibility of being nondetectable CTCs. Heterogeneous expression of hormonal receptors (HR) in samples from the same patients was found. Discordances between HR expression, HER2 and TOP2A status in CTCs and their primary tumour were found in the sequential blood samples. Less that 35% of patients switched their CTC status after receiving chemotherapy. EGFR-positive CTCs were associated to Luminal tumours (p=0.03).
Conclusion:
This is the largest exploratory CTCs biomarker analysis in nonmetastatic BC patients. Our study suggests that CTCs biomarkers profiles might be useful as a surrogate marker for therapeutic selection and monitoring since heterogeneity of the biomarkers distribution in CTCs and the lack of correlation with the primary tumor biomarker status were found. Further exploration of the association between EGFR-positive CTCs and Luminal tumours is warranted.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/3/R71</link>
                <dc:creator>Rosa Nadal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ana Fernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pedro Sanchez-Rovira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marta Salido</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Rodriguez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jose Garcia-Puche</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marta Macia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josep Coromines</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucas Gonzalez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joan Albanell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Fernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francesc Sole</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jose Lorente</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M. Jose Serrano</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R71</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3180</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3180-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R71</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R61">
        <title>In vivo breast cancer characterization imaging using two monoclonal antibodies activatably labeled with near infrared fluorophores</title>
        <description>IntroductionThe gene expression profiles of cancer cells are closely related to their aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Antibody-based immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tissue specimens is a common method of identifying expressed proteins in cancer cells and increasingly inform treatment decisions. Molecular imaging is a potential method of performing similar IHC studies in vivo without the requirement for biopsy or tumor excision. To date, antibody-based imaging has been limited by high background levels related to slow clearance, making such imaging practical. However, optically activatable imaging agents, which are only fluorescent when bound to their cognate receptor, open the possibility of doing in vivo multi-color IHC.
Methods:
We describe the use of activatable, near infrared fluorescence-labeled AlexaFluor680 (Alexa680) conjugated panitumumab (Pan) targeted against human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (Pan-Alexa680) and Indocyanine Green (ICG) conjugated trastuzumab (Tra) targeted against human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) (Tra-ICG) were synthesized and evaluated in cells in vitro and in an orthotopic breast cancer mouse model in vivo.
Results:
Pan-Alexa680 (self-quenched; SQ) and Tra-ICG were initially quenched but demonstrated a 5.2- and 50-fold dequenching capacity under detergent treatment, respectively. In vitro microscopy and flow cytometry using MDA-MB-468 (EGFR+/HER2-) and 3T3/HER2 cells (EGFR-/HER2+), demonstrated specific fluorescence signal for each cell type based on binding to Pan-Alexa680(SQ) or Tra-ICG. An in vivo imaging study employing a cocktail of Pan-Alexa680(SQ) and Tra-ICG (each 50 &#956;g) was injected into mice with orthotopic MDA-MB-468 and 3T3/HER2 tumors in the breast. Each probe visualized only the target-specific breast tumor.
Conclusions:
Multi-color target-specific fluorescence breast cancer imaging can be achieved in vivo by employing two activatable fluorescent probes administered as a cocktail. The images allowed us to see a specific receptor expression in each breast tumor without post-image processing.</description>
        <link>http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R61</link>
                <dc:creator>Kohei Sano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Makoto Mitsunaga</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Takahito Nakajima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Choyke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hisataka Kobayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Breast Cancer Research 2012, null:R61</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/bcr3167</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/bcr3167-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Breast Cancer Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1465-5411</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R61</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

