NCBI
PubMed
A service of the
U.S. National Library of Medicine
and the
National Institutes of Health
My NCBI
[Sign In]
[Register]
All Databases
PubMed
Nucleotide
Protein
Genome
Structure
OMIM
PMC
Journals
Books
Search
Database name
PubMed
Protein
Nucleotide
GSS
EST
Structure
Genome
Books
CancerChromosomes
Conserved Domains
dbGaP
3D Domains
Gene
Genome Project
GENSAT
GEO Profiles
GEO DataSets
HomoloGene
Journals
MeSH
NCBI Web Site
NLM Catalog
OMIA
OMIM
PMC
PopSet
Probe
Protein Clusters
PubChem BioAssay
PubChem Compound
PubChem Substance
SNP
SRA
Taxonomy
ToolKit
ToolKitAll
UniGene
UniSTS
for
Search term
Go
Clear
Advanced Search
Limits
Preview/Index
History
Clipboard
Details
Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information
here...
Display
Summary
Brief
Abstract
AbstractPlus
Citation
MEDLINE
XML
UI List
LinkOut
ASN.1
Related Articles
Cited in Books
CancerChrom Links
Domain Links
3D Domain Links
dbGaP Links
GEO DataSet Links
Gene Links
Gene (OMIM) Links
Gene (GeneRIF) Links
Genome Links
Project Links
GENSAT Links
GEO Profile Links
HomoloGene Links
Nucleotide Links
Nucleotide (RefSeq) Links
Nucleotide (Weighted) Links
EST Links
EST (RefSeq) Links
GSS Links
GSS (RefSeq) Links
OMIA Links
OMIM (calculated) Links
OMIM (cited) Links
BioAssay Links
Compound Links
Compound (MeSH Keyword)
Compound (Publisher) Links
Substance Links
Substance (MeSH Keyword)
Substance (Publisher) Links
PMC Links
Cited in PMC
PopSet Links
Probe Links
Protein Links
Protein (RefSeq) Links
Protein (Weighted) Links
Protein Cluster Links
Cited Articles
SNP Links
SNP (Cited)
Structure Links
Taxonomy via GenBank
UniGene Links
UniSTS Links
Show
5
10
20
50
100
200
500
Sort By
Pub Date
First Author
Last Author
Journal
Title
Send to
Text
File
Printer
Clipboard
Collections
E-mail
Order
All: 1
Review: 0
Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.
1:
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2004 Oct 20;96(20):1510-7.
Related Articles
,
Links
Comment in:
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1488-9.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):857; author reply 857-8.
Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.
Khan SA
,
Wiley EL
,
Rodriguez N
,
Baird C
,
Ramakrishnan R
,
Nayar R
,
Bryk M
,
Bethke KB
,
Staradub VL
,
Wolfman J
,
Rademaker A
,
Ljung BM
,
Morrow M
.
Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA. skhan@nmh.org
BACKGROUND: Ductal lavage has the potential to detect cancer by sampling breast epithelium in asymptomatic high-risk women. To assess the utility of ductal lavage as a cancer diagnostic test, we investigated the association between ductal lavage cytologic findings and histologic findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: Ductal lavage was performed in the operating room before mastectomy on 44 breasts from 32 women with known cancer and on eight breasts from seven women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy, two with occult malignancy. If the ductal lavage sample from one or more ducts contained enough epithelial cells for a cytologic diagnosis, lavaged ducts were injected with a mixture of colored dye, gelatin, and a radiographic contrast compound after mastectomy, and breast tissue was radiographed and sectioned. Histologic findings in ducts with and without dye were recorded. Associations between cytologic results and histologic results were examined by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: At least one duct was lavaged in 36 breasts (mean = 1.4 ducts per breast); all histologic and cytologic procedures were completed in 28 breasts and in 39 ducts. Markedly atypical or malignant cytology was found in five cancer-containing breasts. In 39 ducts with complete cytologic and histologic data and when marked atypia or malignant cells defined a positive cytologic test, sensitivity was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23% to 72%), specificity was 96% (95% CI = 86% to 100%), and accuracy was 77% (95% CI = 63% to 89%). When mild or marked atypia or malignant cells defined a positive cytologic test, sensitivity was 79% (95% CI = 57% to 96%), specificity was 64% (95% CI = 46% to 83%), and accuracy was 69% (95% CI = 55% to 83%). When all 31 cytologically evaluable breasts were analyzed, sensitivity was 17% (95% CI = 7% to 35%), specificity was 100% (95% CI = 5% to 100%), and accuracy was 19% (95% CI = 9% to 38%). CONCLUSION: In breasts with cancer, ductal lavage appears to have low sensitivity and high specificity for cancer detection, possibly because cancer-containing ducts fail to yield fluid or have benign or mildly atypical cytology.
Publication Types:
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
PMID: 15494601 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Display
Summary
Brief
Abstract
AbstractPlus
Citation
MEDLINE
XML
UI List
LinkOut
ASN.1
Related Articles
Cited in Books
CancerChrom Links
Domain Links
3D Domain Links
dbGaP Links
GEO DataSet Links
Gene Links
Gene (OMIM) Links
Gene (GeneRIF) Links
Genome Links
Project Links
GENSAT Links
GEO Profile Links
HomoloGene Links
Nucleotide Links
Nucleotide (RefSeq) Links
Nucleotide (Weighted) Links
EST Links
EST (RefSeq) Links
GSS Links
GSS (RefSeq) Links
OMIA Links
OMIM (calculated) Links
OMIM (cited) Links
BioAssay Links
Compound Links
Compound (MeSH Keyword)
Compound (Publisher) Links
Substance Links
Substance (MeSH Keyword)
Substance (Publisher) Links
PMC Links
Cited in PMC
PopSet Links
Probe Links
Protein Links
Protein (RefSeq) Links
Protein (Weighted) Links
Protein Cluster Links
Cited Articles
SNP Links
SNP (Cited)
Structure Links
Taxonomy via GenBank
UniGene Links
UniSTS Links
Show
5
10
20
50
100
200
500
Sort By
Pub Date
First Author
Last Author
Journal
Title
Send to
Text
File
Printer
Clipboard
Collections
E-mail
Order
About Entrez
Text Version
Entrez PubMed
Overview
Help
|
FAQ
Tutorials
New/Noteworthy
E-Utilities
PubMed Services
Journals Database
MeSH Database
Single Citation Matcher
Batch Citation Matcher
Clinical Queries
Special Queries
LinkOut
My NCBI
Related Resources
Order Documents
NLM Mobile
NLM Catalog
NLM Gateway
TOXNET
Consumer Health
Clinical Alerts
ClinicalTrials.gov
PubMed Central
Write to the Help Desk
NCBI
|
NLM
|
NIH
Department of Health & Human Services
Privacy Statement
|
Freedom of Information Act
|
Disclaimer