Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...
Items 1 - 20 of 170
of 9Next
1:

Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view.

Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Astley SM, Gillan MG, McGee MA, Boggis CR, Wilson M, Beetles UM, Griffiths MA, Jain AK, Johnson J, Roberts R, Deans H, Duncan KA, Iyengar G, Griffiths PM, Warwick J, Cuzick J, Gilbert FJ.

Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(4):R64. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

PMID: 18651965 [PubMed - in process]

2:

Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors.

McCormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, dos Santos Silva I.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1148-54.

PMID: 17548677 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

3:

Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk.

Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Carston MJ, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jan;16(1):43-9.

PMID: 17220330 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

4:

Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.

Helvie MA, Chan HP, Adler DD, Boyd PG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Dec;163(6):1371-4.

PMID: 7992731 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

5:

Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.

Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Milanese T, Carston MJ, Sellers TA.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 May;16(5):921-8.

PMID: 17507617 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

6:

Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.

Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG.

Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):695-701.

PMID: 17114620 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

7:

A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.

Glide-Hurst CK, Duric N, Littrup P.

Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4491-8.

PMID: 18072514 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

8:

Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study.

Ding J, Warren R, Warsi I, Day N, Thompson D, Brady M, Tromans C, Highnam R, Easton D.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1074-81.

PMID: 18483328 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

9:

Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.

Brnić Z, Hebrang A.

Eur J Radiol. 2001 Oct;40(1):10-5.

PMID: 11673002 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

10:

An automated approach for estimation of breast density.

Heine JJ, Carston MJ, Scott CG, Brandt KR, Wu FF, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, Vachon CM.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Nov;17(11):3090-7.

PMID: 18990749 [PubMed - in process]

11:

Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images.

Glide-Hurst CK, Duric N, Littrup P.

Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):3988-97.

PMID: 18841850 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

12:

Does breast size modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk?

Stuedal A, Ma H, Bernstein L, Pike MC, Ursin G.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Mar;17(3):621-7.

PMID: 18349279 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

13:

Physical activity and mammographic breast density in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort study.

Peters TM, Ekelund U, Leitzmann M, Easton D, Warren R, Luben R, Bingham S, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ.

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):579-85. Epub 2007 Dec 27.

PMID: 18162477 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

14:

Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods.

Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Dec;173(6):1643-9.

PMID: 10584814 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

15:

A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Khazen M, Warren RM, Boggis CR, Bryant EC, Reed S, Warsi I, Pointon LJ, Kwan-Lim GE, Thompson D, Eeles R, Easton D, Evans DG, Leach MO; Collaborators in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Screening (MARIBS) Study.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep;17(9):2268-74.

PMID: 18768492 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

16:

Using mammographic density to improve breast cancer screening outcomes.

Kavanagh AM, Byrnes GB, Nickson C, Cawson JN, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Gertig DM, English DR.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Oct;17(10):2818-24.

PMID: 18843028 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

17:

Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Eng-Wong J, Orzano-Birgani J, Chow CK, Venzon D, Yao J, Galbo CE, Zujewski JA, Prindiville S.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jul;17(7):1696-701. Epub 2008 Jun 26.

PMID: 18583470 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

18:

Mammographic breast density and cancer risk: the radiological view.

Yaffe M, Boyd N.

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005 Jul;21 Suppl 1:6-11.

PMID: 16112949 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

19:

Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density.

Gao J, Warren R, Warren-Forward H, Forbes JF.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Mar;108(1):121-7. Epub 2007 Jul 7.

PMID: 17616811 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

20:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and change in mammographic density: a cohort study using pharmacy records on over 29,000 postmenopausal women.

Terry MB, Buist DS, Trentham-Dietz A, James-Todd TM, Liao Y.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1088-95.

PMID: 18483330 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Items 1 - 20 of 170
of 9Next